HD for sample libraries: Internal SATA vs external USB2?

For anything relating to music-making on Windows computers, with lots of FAQs. Moderated by Martin Walker.
Post Reply

HD for sample libraries: Internal SATA vs external USB2?

Post by DoItAgain »

Hi folks,

I've noticed one or two sample library suppliers recommending installing onto a ' fast external drive '.

Is this because it'll somehow perform better than an internal drive? Or more so that library content can be portable and used on more than one machine?

Up 'til now I've been storing samples on a partition on the same drive as XP (until I could afford to add a separate drive) which was fine for a while but I'm now using library content more and more and noticing more dropouts etc.

I'll be going back over my system tweaks before splashing out on a new drive so in the meantime any advice on the above Qs would be lovely.
DoItAgain
Regular
Posts: 121 Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 12:00 am
 

Re: HD for sample libraries: Internal SATA vs external USB2?

Post by muzines »

DoItAgain wrote:Is this because it'll somehow perform better than an internal drive?

In general yes. Let the system handle the system drive and swap file, and spread the sample load onto a different disk will get you better performance in general.
User avatar
muzines
Jedi Poster
Posts: 12332 Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:00 am
..............................mu:zines | music magazine archive | difficultAudio  | Legacy Logic Project Conversion

Re: HD for sample libraries: Internal SATA vs external USB2?

Post by Mixedup »

Either will work. And you can always remount an internal drive as an external or vice versa. One thing to bear in mind is that if you install a lot of internal drives, there's potential for them to generate a lot of noise. With an external drive you can plug it in when needed. Though it's arguably better to boot them up regularly in any case...

Also, you could use the older IDE drives instead of SATA quite comfortably as long as you get the 7200rpm ones... and you might find them cheaper.
User avatar
Mixedup
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4557 Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 12:00 am Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

Re: HD for sample libraries: Internal SATA vs external USB2?

Post by DoItAgain »

Thanks :)

In that case I'll start shopping around for an external 7200rpm drive.

(I forgot to mention that I do have a 2nd internal drive but this is strictly reserved for my main audio partition. If usb2 is just as stable and fast as sata then going external will add a bit more flexibility.)
DoItAgain
Regular
Posts: 121 Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 12:00 am
 

Re: HD for sample libraries: Internal SATA vs external USB2?

Post by RichD »

you could try esata or usb3. both of these will give you better performance compared to usb2. you will prob need to get the corresponding controller card too.
RichD
Poster
Posts: 41 Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 12:00 am

Re: HD for sample libraries: Internal SATA vs external USB2?

Post by tim_obrien »

dont forget there are drives like Glyph that have usb, sata AND firewire all in one box so you can hook it up any way you want!!
:D
tim_obrien
Regular
Posts: 148 Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 12:00 am

Re: HD for sample libraries: Internal SATA vs external USB2?

Post by Mixedup »

DoItAgain wrote:Thanks :)

In that case I'll start shopping around for an external 7200rpm drive.

(I forgot to mention that I do have a 2nd internal drive but this is strictly reserved for my main audio partition. If usb2 is just as stable and fast as sata then going external will add a bit more flexibility.)

Well, eSATA, USB3 and FW800 are all faster. But importantly USB2 is plenty fast enough for the job, and it's cheaper. Spend the extra on a bigger or better drive rather than a faster connection that yuo're not going to use!
User avatar
Mixedup
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4557 Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 12:00 am Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

Re: HD for sample libraries: Internal SATA vs external USB2?

Post by DoItAgain »

Mixedup wrote: Well, eSATA, USB3 and FW800 are all faster. But importantly USB2 is plenty fast enough for the job, and it's cheaper. Spend the extra on a bigger or better drive rather than a faster connection that yuo're not going to use!

Thanks!

That's the exact advice I didn't know I was looking for :)

I've just ordered a Western Digital Elements 1.5tb USB2 7200rpm drive which will hopefully be more than adequate for some time to come.
DoItAgain
Regular
Posts: 121 Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 12:00 am
 
Post Reply