Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

For everything after the recording stage: hardware/software and how you use it.

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by johnny h »

deadman wrote:
markvr4 wrote:
However, given what you are trying to accomplish with looping, I would guess that if you can't do it the way you want in Ableton, you probably won't be able to it in any sequencer without using some kind of plugin.

Yet another person who can't or wont read!

:boring:
johnny h
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4405 Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:00 am

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by The Fold Studios »

Yet another person who can't or wont read!


Yet another ungracious comment from someone whom everyone is trying to help. You seem to have been friendly to Urthlupe simpley because he said he understands your frustration. If you bothered to read the first paragraph of Markvr4's comment you'll notice it was a direct answer to your question. Just because he happened to elaborate by giving you some informaiton he felt may have helped you, you react by burning out this rather short fuse of yours. perhaps you've had a few too many late nights on logic recently.

I don't know why I'm even bothering to reply really. Johnny h is on the money. I just find lack of respect such an odious characteristic. :madas:
User avatar
The Fold Studios
Regular
Posts: 121 Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:00 am

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by The Elf »

+1

A forum is a place for discussion. It is not anyone’s ‘service-level-guaranteed’ personal help line. Ask for help, but don’t *demand* it.

A forum is not a place to demand personalised, targeted answers to your specific problem. Ask, by all means, but be gracious. People are giving their time, knowledge and skills for free. Accept that respondents might not always give you the answer you want to hear. Some will misunderstand – provide guidance. Some will suggest alternatives – be considerate of such suggestions. Others will simply take the chance to answer (or ask) a different question – be accepting.

If the answers here aren’t to your liking, then go elsewhere. I think you’ll find some of those other places far less forgiving.

I suggest a couple of apologies are in order, then maybe you’ll get more advice, If not, then I, for one, hope that everyone considers this thread dead.
User avatar
The Elf
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 21437 Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by deadman »

I asked a simple question and got bollox replies, the Ableton quote was the OPPOSITE of what i said which proved he didn't even read it, so WHY POST!!!!???? i agreed with the other guy and thanked him because HE'S IS THE ONLY PERSON WHO HAS REPLIED WITH THE EXPERIENCED OPINION I ASKED FOR!!! the ONLY one! out of all the posts, it's YOUR unhelpful timewasting crap that has ruined this thread, it was not me, get a life and stop replying to peoples questions when you have NO ANSWERS for them!! loser!
deadman
Poster
Posts: 32 Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:00 am

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by Tomás Mulcahy »

What fun. A troll.
User avatar
Tomás Mulcahy
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3007 Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:00 am Location: Cork, Ireland.

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by deadman »

The Elf wrote:+1

A forum is a place for discussion. It is not anyone’s ‘service-level-guaranteed’ personal help line. Ask for help, but don’t *demand* it.

A forum is not a place to demand personalised, targeted answers to your specific problem. Ask, by all means, but be gracious. People are giving their time, knowledge and skills for free. Accept that respondents might not always give you the answer you want to hear. Some will misunderstand – provide guidance. Some will suggest alternatives – be considerate of such suggestions. Others will simply take the chance to answer (or ask) a different question – be accepting.

If the answers here aren’t to your liking, then go elsewhere. I think you’ll find some of those other places far less forgiving.

I suggest a couple of apologies are in order, then maybe you’ll get more advice, If not, then I, for one, hope that everyone considers this thread dead.

No-one MAKES you respond to a thread mate, or are you controlled completely by your desperate need to communicate even if it's irrelevant??? appologise? me? are you joking? Get a life and go answer some questions you know the answer to, if there are any.
deadman
Poster
Posts: 32 Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:00 am

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by johnny h »

deadman wrote:I asked a simple question and got bollox replies, the Ableton quote was the OPPOSITE of what i said which proved he didn't even read it, so WHY POST!!!!???? i agreed with the other guy and thanked him because HE'S IS THE ONLY PERSON WHO HAS REPLIED WITH THE EXPERIENCED OPINION I ASKED FOR!!! the ONLY one! out of all the posts, it's YOUR unhelpful timewasting crap that has ruined this thread, it was not me, get a life and stop replying to peoples questions when you have NO ANSWERS for them!! loser!

I just scanned all the caps in this post so I couldn't be bothered to read it. Its surely just a sad angry-man whinge.

Nobody wants to help people with no manners. Give your caps lock a rest, see a therapist and work through your anger problems. Come back when you've learnt some rudimentary social skills.
johnny h
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4405 Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:00 am

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by Studio Support Gnome »

or not..... indeed, bye bye.....
User avatar
Studio Support Gnome
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3025 Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 12:00 am Location: UK
Mostly Retired from Audio.... If I already know you I'll help,  if not....    Ask Hugh Robjohns, unless that is you're in need of 80's shred guitar... that, I'm still interested in having fun with...

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by Zukan »

Image
User avatar
Zukan
Moderator
Posts: 10135 Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 12:00 am
'Shaka. When the walls fell. Zukan...with his arms wide.'

1-2-1 Tuition

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by 4TrackMadman »

Overall what I've seen from PT in terms of audio interface and converters has been lower quality than similarly priced units from other companies. I am not sure exactly in your specific scenario but I am willing to bet that the RME/Apogee would be better quality that the 03.

If you don't like the midi in Logic - why not give Digital Performer a try? I found that to be the most robust app for midi out there. With their crossgrade package you'd only spend $350 I think.
User avatar
4TrackMadman
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1114 Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 12:00 am

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by muzines »

I must remember this conversational approach next time I'm at a dinner party.

I'm sure it will work just as well in real life as it obviously does on the interwebs...

The guy does have a point about Logic though - I think there are some great things it could do to improve parts of the sequencer, especially for this style of programming.

Unfortunately, of late, everything seems very audio-focused...
User avatar
muzines
Jedi Poster
Posts: 12332 Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:00 am
..............................mu:zines | music magazine archive | difficultAudio  | Legacy Logic Project Conversion

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by MadManDan »

deadman wrote:
The Elf wrote:+1

A forum is a place for discussion. It is not anyone’s ‘service-level-guaranteed’ personal help line. Ask for help, but don’t *demand* it.

A forum is not a place to demand personalised, targeted answers to your specific problem. Ask, by all means, but be gracious. People are giving their time, knowledge and skills for free. Accept that respondents might not always give you the answer you want to hear. Some will misunderstand – provide guidance. Some will suggest alternatives – be considerate of such suggestions. Others will simply take the chance to answer (or ask) a different question – be accepting.

If the answers here aren’t to your liking, then go elsewhere. I think you’ll find some of those other places far less forgiving.

I suggest a couple of apologies are in order, then maybe you’ll get more advice, If not, then I, for one, hope that everyone considers this thread dead.

No-one MAKES you respond to a thread mate, or are you controlled completely by your desperate need to communicate even if it's irrelevant??? appologise? me? are you joking? Get a life and go answer some questions you know the answer to, if there are any.


deadman wrote:I asked a simple question and got bollox replies, the Ableton quote was the OPPOSITE of what i said which proved he didn't even read it, so WHY POST!!!!???? i agreed with the other guy and thanked him because HE'S IS THE ONLY PERSON WHO HAS REPLIED WITH THE EXPERIENCED OPINION I ASKED FOR!!! the ONLY one! out of all the posts, it's YOUR unhelpful timewasting crap that has ruined this thread, it was not me, get a life and stop replying to peoples questions when you have NO ANSWERS for them!! loser!


Wow ! Deadman, you really seem to get along well with people. What line of work are you in? You seem like one of those people who makes sure all your co-workers and superiors KNOW that YOU’RE in charge LOL
User avatar
MadManDan
Frequent Poster
Posts: 601 Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 12:00 am Location: Across the pond....New Yawk
Late '14 mini 3 GHz i7 16 GB
Catalina 10.15.7. Glyph atomic. FF Scarlet 18i8. 
Sup Drum 3. Cubase 11 Pro
iCon iKb 8x.  Mics, spkrs, 'phones, gtrs, greedy cat

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by Steve Hill »

I'm tempted to lock this now that the OP has, as it were, passed on. But does anyone know if any sequencer will actually solve the original question? I'm not at all convinced PT is the answer either. There may not be one?
User avatar
Steve Hill
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3206 Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by Richie Royale »

Steve Hill wrote:I'm tempted to lock this now that the OP has, as it were, passed on. But does anyone know if any sequencer will actually solve the original question? I'm not at all convinced PT is the answer either. There may not be one?

I was thinking about this on my way to work and I think only a hardware sequencer would be able to do what the OP is looking for, but my exeprience of DAWs is limited. I thought of Numerology, but I don't think that would do what he wants.
User avatar
Richie Royale
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4551 Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:00 am Location: Bristol, England.

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by johnny h »

Steve Hill wrote:I'm tempted to lock this now that the OP has, as it were, passed on. But does anyone know if any sequencer will actually solve the original question? I'm not at all convinced PT is the answer either. There may not be one?

I don't think any sequencer would solve the problems of a man with those anger problems!

Cubase is pretty good for midi though.
johnny h
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4405 Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:00 am

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by Urthlupe »

None that I know of Steve.

Loopy
User avatar
Urthlupe
Frequent Poster
Posts: 615 Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:00 am Location: West Midlands/Pembrokeshire UK

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by Stuart Churchill »

I'm no expert, but wouldn't a simple solution be to set recording time for a few dozen (or more) bars instead of looping for 2 bars. You could then pick out your best bits.
User avatar
Stuart Churchill
Poster
Posts: 79 Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 12:00 am
Birthday Song 4 U. Personalised Birthday Songs

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by jayzed »

I've only breezed through this lot but would Ultrabeat do what the OP needs?
I've not used UB in this way so I may be on the wrong track here.
The functionality required is drum machine rather than sequencer so if the UB in-built sequencer works in the manner required it would be a simple matter to record the sequence and then drag the MIDI into a track routed to whatever VI that was needed.
User avatar
jayzed
Frequent Poster
Posts: 507 Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:00 am Location: North London

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by muzines »

No. You can't even real-time write into Ultrabeat, which I consider a major limitation of it, as I can play what I want about 10 times faster than I can click in the beats on numbered beat positions with the mouse. :frown:
User avatar
muzines
Jedi Poster
Posts: 12332 Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:00 am
..............................mu:zines | music magazine archive | difficultAudio  | Legacy Logic Project Conversion

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by vinyl_junkie »

What about Native Instruments Maschine?
I was considering it my self but I'm no way selling my MPC which is rock solid for that..even If I won't use my MPC as much as I did in my production now I am migrating to a modern DAW it will be used for the live show's with my S-3200XL..I will not use a laptop live lol
vinyl_junkie
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1579 Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 12:00 am Location: Kent, UK

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by jayzed »

Bugger, on the Ultrabeat thing. BTW, cheers, desmond - I'll be calling on you whenever my Mac clients have a problem :-) I think that's the third or fourth clarification on Mac stuff you've helped me with! (I do general studio support, Macs are only part of that).
User avatar
jayzed
Frequent Poster
Posts: 507 Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:00 am Location: North London

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by muzines »

Only three or four? How long have you been here, man..?!

;)
User avatar
muzines
Jedi Poster
Posts: 12332 Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:00 am
..............................mu:zines | music magazine archive | difficultAudio  | Legacy Logic Project Conversion

Re: Sound quality difference btwn, logic/apogee + protools 8 le

Post by jayzed »

Third or fourth for ME, mate. For Me.

Jeez, talk about not taking a compliment :-)
User avatar
jayzed
Frequent Poster
Posts: 507 Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:00 am Location: North London
Post Reply