Audio Candy

For everything after the recording stage: hardware/software and how you use it.
Post Reply

Audio Candy

Post by _ Six _ »

What are the little tricks of almost inaudible sounds that just make your mixes come alive?
User avatar
_ Six _
Frequent Poster
Posts: 823 Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:00 am

Re: Audio Candy

Post by Bossman »

for me its delays and ambience, but I'm always on the scout for new tricks, so I eagerly await more replies
User avatar
Bossman
Frequent Poster
Posts: 698 Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:00 am Location: UK
www.Lozjackson.com | www.audiowall.co.uk | audioshop.london

Re: Audio Candy

Post by Shreddie »

Pads and random stuff (which can be almost anything) mixed in at a low level.
Shreddie
Regular
Posts: 259 Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:00 am

Re: Audio Candy

Post by Zukan »

ghost notes

eqing harmonics

and.................
User avatar
Zukan
Moderator
Posts: 10135 Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 12:00 am
'Shaka. When the walls fell. Zukan...with his arms wide.'

1-2-1 Tuition

Re: Audio Candy

Post by * User requested deletion 2 * »

Glockenspiel.

Hugely under rated, but it was good enough for Spector. And Stravinsky, come to think of it, so it's a no brainer for me.
* User requested deletion 2 *
Frequent Poster
Posts: 625 Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:00 am

Re: Audio Candy

Post by Frisonic »

Mongolian yak bells.

Only joking but I do trawl through the sample library in Login sometimes and wonder 'what on earth'? And just occasionally I find inspiration to add a little environmental ambiance, just tucked away somewhere in the back of the mix to glue phrases together (don't forget to use pitch shift).
Frisonic
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2951 Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:00 am Location: Refugee currently in transition.
Still strictly project but lately on the run.

Re: Audio Candy

Post by hollowsun »

More cowbell.
User avatar
hollowsun
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2036 Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:00 am Location: Cowbridge, South Wales
Website / Music Lab Machines / Blog

Re: Audio Candy

Post by jellyjim »

hollowsun wrote:More cowbell.

Chortle
User avatar
jellyjim
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1753 Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:00 am Location: uk
Original artwork and unique devices inspired by vintage technology http://www.thisisobsolete.com

Re: Audio Candy

Post by jellyjim »

Banjo
User avatar
jellyjim
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1753 Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:00 am Location: uk
Original artwork and unique devices inspired by vintage technology http://www.thisisobsolete.com

Re: Audio Candy

Post by TheReson8or »

percussion and good use of BVs!
User avatar
TheReson8or
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1569 Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 12:00 am Location: derbyshire uk
My head hurts!

Re: Audio Candy

Post by . . . Delete This User . . . »

hollowsun wrote:More cowbell.

no, , seriously, he's right...... more cowbell is ALWAYS the answer....
. . . Delete This User . . .
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2319 Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:00 am

Re: Audio Candy

Post by Darclinc »

Contrast.

D.
User avatar
Darclinc
Regular
Posts: 382 Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 12:00 am Location: Earth

Re: Audio Candy

Post by StuartBallingall »

Bit crusher placed post reverb.

I've had most success with using a guitar amp sim with spring reverb engaged as the reverb unit.

adjust gain of amp sim to drive the bit crusher to required effect and then apply large amounts of EQ to the lot.

bury it in the mix.
User avatar
StuartBallingall
Regular
Posts: 135 Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:00 am

Re: Audio Candy

Post by BJG145 »

idris y draig wrote:
hollowsun wrote:More cowbell.

no, seriously, he's right...... more cowbell is ALWAYS the answer

I love cowbells. Our drummer used to play syncopated rhythms between a regular one and a pedal-driven one.

And shakers. And timp samples.
User avatar
BJG145
Longtime Poster
Posts: 8085 Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 12:00 am Location: UK

Re: Audio Candy

Post by tomafd »

Shreddie wrote:Pads and random stuff (which can be almost anything) mixed in at a low level.

probably a purely psycho acoustic thing ... but I do like to have one track of just 'noise' or 'nothing', recorded for the length of the track in an empty room, no edits allowed. If the rest of the track doesn't feature at least one entire performance recorded straight through and left unedited, this- for some utterly bizarre reason I can't put my finger on- just makes it all sound better. I have no idea why, but I suspect the brain reacts better to 'real-time' information, somewhere in the mix, and if you present it with music which doesn't actually have true real-time info in there somewhere, across the whole time period of the tune, it gets bored, or confused, or just perceives something as 'wrong'.

The weirdest thing is that this won't work if you take an old recording of 'nothing' and stick it on your latest tune. It has to be recorded during the same period during which you're working on the tune. You know all those old, great, 'classic' recordings where most of the tune was played real-time, no edits, few overdubs ? They're chock full of 'atmosphere', 'feel', all these amorphous things which we think can be produced by slapping Vintage Warmer or something over the track - well, no, that isn't it. It's the atmosphere of where they were recorded, at the time they were recorded- and it's a very subtle thing. Try it - stick a mic up, and record some silence. It may not work for you, but it sure works for me.
tomafd
Frequent Poster
Posts: 779 Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 12:00 am
Post Reply