Simple 2-buss transformer box

For everything after the recording stage: hardware/software and how you use it.
Post Reply

Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by Evie McCreevie »

I'm looking for a stereo, line level box with transformers - purely for the 'transformer sound' - to run mixes through.

I don't need multi-input summing, output to mic-input levels, compression or anything fancy... just +4 stereo line in and out through decent transformers (Cinemags, Lundahls etc).

Sounds simple, but does such a thing exist? Any suggestions?
User avatar
Evie McCreevie
Regular
Posts: 445 Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 12:00 am Location: Dublin

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by 77raymondo77 »

One here or if you're handy with a soldering iron get a pair of these 23-112 Lundahl LL 1540 Transformers, they work well as ground loop hum isolators but I'm not sure you'll get that full on analogue ABBA sound, even though they're made in Sweden. I wonder if el cheapos, mixed in parallel, would give you more 'character'.
77raymondo77
New here
Posts: 5 Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:00 am

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by Evie McCreevie »

Thanks for the reply...

I've found a few similar DIY solutions online – but surely someone makes a ready-to-go box?
User avatar
Evie McCreevie
Regular
Posts: 445 Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 12:00 am Location: Dublin

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by Exalted Wombat »

THIS is still my favourite. Nice big solid transformers. And you can't argue about the price.

It's much more about recording good instruments, played well, in a nice room though. You can always turn the treble down a bit for a nice "mellow" sound.

Edited by James Perrett to fix link
Exalted Wombat
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5846 Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:00 am Location: London UK
You don't have to write songs. The world doesn't want you to write songs. It would probably prefer it if you didn't. So write songs if you want to. Otherwise, please don't bore us with beefing about it. Go fishing instead.

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by Martin Walker »

Hi Evie!

I know you're after a ready built solution, but have you read this entertaining thread on the DIY approach with plenty of examples?

http://www.soundonsound.com/forum/showf ... ber=897262

That Canford box could well be a little 'too' good if you want to add some flavour to your mixes - they quote '+/- 1.0dB, 40Hz-20kHz' and 'Better than 0.015% / 1% , 1kHz / 30Hz, +22dBu'.

I'd certainly be pushed to hear 1% of distortion at 30Hz in the context of a mix, and that's assuming that you can push the peak level up to +22dBu to achieve it :beamup:

Martin
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 22577 Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:44 am Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by JonathanRace »

I know there was one made for the Api lunchbox which looked pretty good. Had switchable transformers as well for different 'flavours' can't remember the name of it atm though I'm afraid.
JonathanRace
Poster
Posts: 47 Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2014 12:00 am

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by James Perrett »

I'd go with EW's ground loop isolator suggestion to start with - they're likely to be easier to saturate than a more expensive transformer though whether you like that sound is a different matter.
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 16990 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by Exalted Wombat »

What design features would make a transformer easy to saturate?
Exalted Wombat
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5846 Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:00 am Location: London UK
You don't have to write songs. The world doesn't want you to write songs. It would probably prefer it if you didn't. So write songs if you want to. Otherwise, please don't bore us with beefing about it. Go fishing instead.

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by James Perrett »

Transformer cores are far from perfectly linear and, in general, the smaller they are, the lower the current required to saturate the core. A decent pro-audio line level transformer is normally far larger than that Maplin box so I would deduce that the 2 transformers in there are fairly small and therefore saturate at a lower current.

As a youngster I remember messing around with small interstage coupling transformers from a cheap intercom - you could make some interesting sounds with them.
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 16990 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by Exalted Wombat »

I must open up one of my Maplin units and see just what's inside. There's certainlt been no attempt to miniaturise. It may be absolute crap. It may just be than no-one told the manufacturer something competent deserved a higher price point.

It would also be interesting to test just what (if anything) is wrong with THIS. Don't forget we seem to be LOOKING for grunge, not a straight wire with ground lift.
Exalted Wombat
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5846 Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:00 am Location: London UK
You don't have to write songs. The world doesn't want you to write songs. It would probably prefer it if you didn't. So write songs if you want to. Otherwise, please don't bore us with beefing about it. Go fishing instead.

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by Evie McCreevie »

Not really looking for 'grunge' - this is the angle I'm coming from...

I have tried summing (including a pricey SSL setup) without being overly impressed. At the same time, number of equipment reviews have concluded that any sonic benefit from summing boxes can most likely be attributed to circuitry such as transformers, rather than the summing process itself. In other words, that processing a stereo mix (rather than a bunch of stems) is just as effective.

Back in 2006, the (largely positive) SOS review of the Audient Sumo said: "Personally I could hear very little difference between using the Sumo as a mixer and using it to process a stereo Logic mix. This being the case, perhaps there's a potential market for a two-channel unit for those of us who can't justify the cost of a Sumo? "

Eight years later, you'd imagine there'd be a few transformer-laden, 2-buss processing boxes on the market, promising to add all manner of 'weight', 'solidity', 'smooth highs' etc.

But where are they?
User avatar
Evie McCreevie
Regular
Posts: 445 Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 12:00 am Location: Dublin

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by Exalted Wombat »

Evie McCreevie wrote:Not really looking for 'grunge' - this is the angle I'm coming from...

I have tried summing (including a pricey SSL setup) without being overly impressed. At the same time, number of equipment reviews have concluded that any sonic benefit from summing boxes can most likely be attributed to circuitry such as transformers, rather than the summing process itself. In other words, that processing a stereo mix (rather than a bunch of stems) is just as effective.

Back in 2006, the (largely positive) SOS review of the Audient Sumo said: "Personally I could hear very little difference between using the Sumo as a mixer and using it to process a stereo Logic mix. This being the case, perhaps there's a potential market for a two-channel unit for those of us who can't justify the cost of a Sumo? "

Eight years later, you'd imagine there'd be a few transformer-laden, 2-buss processing boxes on the market, promising to add all manner of 'weight', 'solidity', 'smooth highs' etc.

But where are they?

It's unlikely that a gear-based magazine is ever going to QUITE come out and say "this is audiophool BS" (though, to SoS's credit they HAVE confirmed that most of us don't need master clocks and, whatever premium mic preamps may be about, they aren't much about detectable sonic difference when used "clean" - yes, my hobby-horse, but it obviously bears repetition.) They said "there might be a potential market...." Maybe the fact that there apparently wasn't should be telling you something...
Exalted Wombat
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5846 Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:00 am Location: London UK
You don't have to write songs. The world doesn't want you to write songs. It would probably prefer it if you didn't. So write songs if you want to. Otherwise, please don't bore us with beefing about it. Go fishing instead.

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by James Perrett »

There are plenty of expensive 2 channel boxes with transformers but they tend to do other things like eq or compression as well. I doubt that most manufacturers would make a simple audiophile transformer isolator box at a sensible price either as the main market for such a device is people who would pay through the nose for the marketing BS.

However, there is one manufacturer that does make a sensibly specced transformer device at a sensible price. I'd suggest taking a look at the Orchid Electronics Dual Isolator.
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 16990 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by ef37a »

Hmm? All seems a bit R.A. to me.
In any case the better the transformer the less you will"hear" it. The BBC et al did not use such expensive devices for their sound but because they had to!

Tell you what. Build the box with some nice Cineies' whatever then clank it onto the back of a handy guitar speaker. You will then get some nice even harmonics!

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19143 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk
#They did not listen, they are not listening still...Perhaps they never will?#

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by Dr Huge Longjohns »

purely for the 'transformer sound'


Can someone explain what this is to me? Cheers.
User avatar
Dr Huge Longjohns
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3953 Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2003 12:00 am Location: Gallifrey
"The performance is 99.9% of what people hear"- J. Leckie
"It's all complete nonsense, anyone who knows what they're doing can deliver great results with whatever comes to hand" - H. Robjohns

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by ef37a »

Huge Longjohns wrote:
purely for the 'transformer sound'


Can someone explain what this is to me? Cheers.

Certainly Huge...It's BOLLOXS!

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19143 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk
#They did not listen, they are not listening still...Perhaps they never will?#

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by Evie McCreevie »

ef37a wrote:
Huge Longjohns wrote:
purely for the 'transformer sound'


Can someone explain what this is to me? Cheers.

Certainly Huge...It's BOLLOXS!

Dave.

Yeah sure, it's all bollocks... Check out Hugh Robjohns talking utter shite:

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/feb10/a ... warmth.htm

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/feb08/a ... 0208_2.htm
User avatar
Evie McCreevie
Regular
Posts: 445 Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 12:00 am Location: Dublin

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by ef37a »

Evie McCreevie wrote:
ef37a wrote:
Huge Longjohns wrote:
purely for the 'transformer sound'


Can someone explain what this is to me? Cheers.

Certainly Huge...It's BOLLOXS!

Dave.

Yeah sure, it's all bollocks... Check out Hugh Robjohns talking utter shite:

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/feb10/a ... warmth.htm

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/feb08/a ... 0208_2.htm

Quite! A reasoned and in depth examination of the subtle effects of various non-linear devices on sound quality.

Not "Bolt any old traff onto your line outs and get superb, retro warmth"!

Or! Put it another way? COMPLICATED BOLLOX.

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19143 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk
#They did not listen, they are not listening still...Perhaps they never will?#

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by Evie McCreevie »

OK, thread back on topic...

Thanks for the suggestions so far, though it looks like some DIY/soldering is on the cards – unless anyone has any other ideas?
User avatar
Evie McCreevie
Regular
Posts: 445 Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 12:00 am Location: Dublin

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by Martin Walker »

Hi Evie,

It does look like DIY is the solution to me.

Why not add a post to that existing DIY forum thread I pointed you at earlier and we can discuss it further?

I've had an interest in doing this myself, but never got around to it. However, I HAVE amassed a good list of URLs with further info on other folk who have done it to good effect, with build details, examples of transformers used, and so on.

If you decide to post in that thread I'll be happy to provide you with my list.

Martin
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 22577 Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:44 am Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by Evie McCreevie »

Martin Walker wrote:Hi Evie,

It does look like DIY is the solution to me.

Why not add a post to that existing DIY forum thread I pointed you at earlier and we can discuss it further?

I've had an interest in doing this myself, but never got around to it. However, I HAVE amassed a good list of URLs with further info on other folk who have done it to good effect, with build details, examples of transformers used, and so on.

If you decide to post in that thread I'll be happy to provide you with my list.

Martin

Done!
User avatar
Evie McCreevie
Regular
Posts: 445 Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 12:00 am Location: Dublin

Re: Simple 2-buss transformer box

Post by Martin Walker »

And my list of links is now finally in place too :crazy:

Hope it helps!

Martin
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 22577 Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:44 am Location: Cornwall, UK
Post Reply