Mic pre 1 Hz to 200kHz - why bother?

Discuss hardware/software tools and techniques involved in capturing sound, in the studio, live or on location.

Re: Mic pre 1 Hz to 200kHz - why bother?

Post by Goddard »

The delay depends upon the digital filter employed (and for FIR filters generally, the number of 'taps') and is characterized by the 'group delay' (specified as the number of samples (or number of sampling periods)). FIR filters exhibiting linear phase delay all frequencies by the same amount (constant group delay).

Filters may exhibit pre- and post-echo, as well as pre- and post-ringing (with 'pre-' signifying an onset before the main impulse).

Btw, analogue filters also impose delay (with 'time constants' equating to their 'corner' frequencies), but such delay is typically so very much shorter (by an order of magnitude) compared with digital filters (micro-seconds as compared with milli-seconds) that it is not noticeable although the alteration in frequency and phase response is.
User avatar
Goddard
Frequent Poster
Posts: 993 Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 12:00 am

Re: Mic pre 1 Hz to 200kHz - why bother?

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

Goddard wrote:FIR filters exhibiting linear phase delay all frequencies by the same amount (constant group delay).

Surely, all linear-phase filters delay all frequencies by the same amount. That's what the phrase means and a primary raison d'etre.

H
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 43691 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: Mic pre 1 Hz to 200kHz - why bother?

Post by Goddard »

Hugh Robjohns wrote:
Goddard wrote:FIR filters exhibiting linear phase delay all frequencies by the same amount (constant group delay).

Surely, all linear-phase filters delay all frequencies by the same amount. That's what the phrase means and a primary raison d'etre.

H

Yes, but although linear-phase filters will invariably be FIR filters, not all FIR filters are necessarily linear-phase (symmetric/freq-invariant) filters! ;)
User avatar
Goddard
Frequent Poster
Posts: 993 Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 12:00 am

Re: Mic pre 1 Hz to 200kHz - why bother?

Post by grab »

Goddard wrote:although linear-phase filters will invariably be FIR filters

Not necessarily. Bessel filters...
grab
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2420 Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 12:00 am Location: Cambridge, UK
 

Re: Mic pre 1 Hz to 200kHz - why bother?

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

grab wrote:
Goddard wrote:although linear-phase filters will invariably be FIR filters

Not necessarily. Bessel filters...

Bessel describes the characteristics. FIR describes the construction! ;)
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 43691 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: Mic pre 1 Hz to 200kHz - why bother?

Post by Goddard »

grab wrote:
Goddard wrote:although linear-phase filters will invariably be FIR filters

Not necessarily. Bessel filters...

Yes, but a Bessel doesn't really transform to digital form.
User avatar
Goddard
Frequent Poster
Posts: 993 Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 12:00 am

Re: Mic pre 1 Hz to 200kHz - why bother?

Post by Forum Admin »

Mixedup wrote:... there's an error (missing non-standard character) in the online version where it discusses Dave Blackmer's thinking behind 200kHz being the required upper limit. Hint, it doesn't mean 5 seconds!

I've inserted the missing micro character where I spotted it was missing. Let me know if there are others (I'll ask for the web article auto-translate script to be updated so that it correctly includes such characters henceforth).

Ian
User avatar
Forum Admin
Moderator
Posts: 4767 Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 11:00 pm Location: A studio deep in the fenlands of Cambridgeshire, UK
SOS FOR ARTISTS - our brand new ecosystem designed to support musicians/artists, producers, and collaborators at every stage of the music-making journey.

➡️ ➡️ 📖 Get your FREE (2nd Edition) RECORDING TECHNOLOGY eBook

🎙️ 🔊 🆘 PODCASTS - 200+ ear-grabbing episodes across 3 Channels - more podcasts released weekly. Search "Sound On Sound" on Apple, Amazon, Spotify.

Re: Mic pre 1 Hz to 200kHz - why bother?

Post by Tomás Mulcahy »

Alba wrote:Its been handy for me while making my new album 'music for elephants a long way away and for some whales too who are always a long way away'

As Spock said There are other species on earth. Only human arrogance would assume the signal must be meant for mankind.

As a bat I resent that statement.
User avatar
Tomás Mulcahy
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3007 Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:00 am Location: Cork, Ireland.

Re: Mic pre 1 Hz to 200kHz - why bother?

Post by Mixedup »

Forum Admin wrote:I've inserted the missing micro character where I spotted it was missing. Let me know if there are others (I'll ask for the web article auto-translate script to be updated so that it correctly includes such characters henceforth).

Thanks. Looks good to me. I can see this and other greek/mathematical symbols cropping up quite frequently when discussing outboard gear, so it would be good if the script could handle them all!
User avatar
Mixedup
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4557 Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 12:00 am Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

Re: Mic pre 1 Hz to 200kHz - why bother?

Post by grab »

Goddard wrote:
grab wrote:
Goddard wrote:although linear-phase filters will invariably be FIR filters

Not necessarily. Bessel filters...

Yes, but a Bessel doesn't really transform to digital form.

Yes, it really does. Not very long ago, I spent a couple of weeks crunching numbers to replace 4th-order IIR Butterworth notch filters with 4th-order IIR Bessel notch filters, because we thought it would improve our controller's step response. So I can testify first-hand that it does transform into digital, because I've done it. ;)

(And yes, it did reduce the initial overshoot on steps when we really caned it. We decided not to use it for various other reasons, but hey, that's R&D for you.)

We did consider an FIR equivalent, but we don't have enough DSP grunt left to do a good enough job in FIR.
grab
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2420 Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 12:00 am Location: Cambridge, UK
 
Post Reply