Another thread here on printing effects has me wondering how best to split a guitar signal to record one dry and one effected path. I previously always recorded with a wet signal only, but feel I should try the approach of having a safety track.
Is a simple DI box at the front of the chain the best idea, or there other approaches I know not of?
Thx,
Grant.
Best approach for splitting a guitar signal.
Best approach for splitting a guitar signal.
-
- Random Guitarist
Frequent Poster - Posts: 1170 Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:00 am Location: West Sussex UK
I've never liked a solo violin, you need at least five for a proper fire.
Re: Best approach for splitting a guitar signal.
I have plans to do exactly this for bass. I'm looking at getting one of these http://orchid-electronics.co.uk/classic_DI.htm recommended by folk in this forum.
Sent from my moto g(6) using Tapatalk
Sent from my moto g(6) using Tapatalk
-
- FastnBulbous
New here -
Posts: 13 Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2018 9:09 am
Location: Malvern, UK
Contact:
Re: Best approach for splitting a guitar signal.
That is what I do for bass but I usually record guitar via a miked amp. You could record the guitar DI as well though giving you the opportunity to re-amp later.
The Orchid Classic is indeed a bargain.
The Orchid Classic is indeed a bargain.
- Sam Spoons
Forum Aficionado - Posts: 22209 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
People often mistake me for a grown-up because of my age.
Re: Best approach for splitting a guitar signal.
Indeed. You need an active DI box with a high impedance input, so that your guitar signal (if using passive pickups) isn't affected by not seeing too low an impedance. The Orchid one linked to is fine for that.
Passive DI boxes are fine for synths or other devices with low impedance active outputs, but the input impedance of these is too low for normal guitar use and will take a lot of treble out of the signal; both the signal off to the amp and the direct signal output.
Passive DI boxes are fine for synths or other devices with low impedance active outputs, but the input impedance of these is too low for normal guitar use and will take a lot of treble out of the signal; both the signal off to the amp and the direct signal output.
Reliably fallible.
Re: Best approach for splitting a guitar signal.
I've always preferred to use a splitter for this - The GigRig one to be specific. It just seems to sound better to me than splitting with a typical DI box. I accept that that's not very scientific of me.
J
J
-
- Jack Ruston
Frequent Poster -
Posts: 3847 Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:00 am
Contact:
Re: Best approach for splitting a guitar signal.
If you're talking about the Humdinger, it really is just a DI box, albeit maybe a nice sounding one. A normal DI box typically has one direct-connected unbalanced output for the amp and a second transformer-isolated output for the mixer. The 'direct' output in the Humdinger just happens to be electronically buffered as well, so that whatever you connect can't affect the loading on the guitar pickups (as it can in the more conventional arrangement).
The Orchid classic box doesn't use transformer isolation for the mixer output, which is electronically balanced with a ground lift instead, but the unbalanced Amp output is electronically buffered, same as the Humdinger.
Orchid's Muting DI box goes a step further, adding a second unbalanced buffered output (labelled Tuner) which is always live, while the mixer and amp outputs are mutable via the stomp button. I have one and find it very useful indeed!
H
The Orchid classic box doesn't use transformer isolation for the mixer output, which is electronically balanced with a ground lift instead, but the unbalanced Amp output is electronically buffered, same as the Humdinger.
Orchid's Muting DI box goes a step further, adding a second unbalanced buffered output (labelled Tuner) which is always live, while the mixer and amp outputs are mutable via the stomp button. I have one and find it very useful indeed!
H
- Hugh Robjohns
Moderator -
Posts: 42806 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual...
Re: Best approach for splitting a guitar signal.
I have a few select DIs, but the ones that see the most use are my Radial J48, which seems to do something special for basses, and a Little Labs Red Eye 3D, which allows for rapid switching between DI and re-amping. Both are much more expensive than the Orchid offerings, though.
Whenever I can I will take a DI. Even if I don't actually use the DI audio itself it can be useful to assist with timing fixes - it can be impossible trying to find note attacks in a distorted guitar recording, but with a parallel DI it's simple. I will lock the DI and distorted tracks together, and edit using the DI as my reference.
Whenever I can I will take a DI. Even if I don't actually use the DI audio itself it can be useful to assist with timing fixes - it can be impossible trying to find note attacks in a distorted guitar recording, but with a parallel DI it's simple. I will lock the DI and distorted tracks together, and edit using the DI as my reference.
Last edited by The Elf on Wed Dec 05, 2018 9:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
Re: Best approach for splitting a guitar signal.
The Elf wrote:Whenever I can I will take a DI. Even if I don't actually use the DI audio itself it can be useful to assist with timing fixes - it can be impossible trying to find note attacks in a distorted guitar recording, but with a parallel DI it's simple. I will lock the DI and distorted tracks together, and edit using the DI as my reference.
::: makes mental note for future reference :::
- Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru -
Posts: 28828 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Contact:
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/
Re: Best approach for splitting a guitar signal.
I have some nice DI's (including 2 of the Orchid ones) and always used the thru function to create a direct and mic'd signal, however I have often wanted to record multiple amps simultaneously, either for a 'choice of' a 'blend of' or just for convenience purposes.
In this situation you need more than the 2 'outs' that a typlical DI would provide so I use a Radial Shotgun
http://www.radialeng.com/product/shotgun
This gives you 4 outs, ground lift, phase flip and typical radial build/sound quality, and is the best solution I found for the money - its about £200-£250
I'd love a JD7 but £1200 is a LOT of money
You could also consider some of the ABY boxes that have a tuner out like this one
http://www.radialeng.com/product/bigshot-aby
that gives you 3 simulataneous outs for a bit cheaper
In this situation you need more than the 2 'outs' that a typlical DI would provide so I use a Radial Shotgun
http://www.radialeng.com/product/shotgun
This gives you 4 outs, ground lift, phase flip and typical radial build/sound quality, and is the best solution I found for the money - its about £200-£250
I'd love a JD7 but £1200 is a LOT of money
You could also consider some of the ABY boxes that have a tuner out like this one
http://www.radialeng.com/product/bigshot-aby
that gives you 3 simulataneous outs for a bit cheaper
Re: Best approach for splitting a guitar signal.
when i record electric guitar i do this most of the time..
i have a mic sound from the amp...i put a di from the guitar before the effects and then put another di after the effects.so my chain would look like this
guitar into di.link into pedal board\multi effects..from pedal board/multi effects into di.link to amp.
then i can re-amp till my hearts content with either di signal..or both...just cause i can
i have a mic sound from the amp...i put a di from the guitar before the effects and then put another di after the effects.so my chain would look like this
guitar into di.link into pedal board\multi effects..from pedal board/multi effects into di.link to amp.
then i can re-amp till my hearts content with either di signal..or both...just cause i can
-
- paul tha other
Frequent Poster - Posts: 826 Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 12:00 am Location: scotland