Is a de-esser necessary for mixing vocals?

For everything after the recording stage: hardware/software and how you use it.

Re: Is a de-esser necessary for mixing vocals?

Post by James Perrett »

The Elf wrote: If I'm being exacting about it I use a tricky arrangement of filters and reverse polarities to sort out the phase anomalies and overhangs arising from the filters.

I'd guess that you do something similar to some speaker designers who invert the polarity of the tweeter. At the crossover point the phase of both signals is shifted by approximately 90 degrees (in opposite directions) so reversing the polarity means that both are in phase at the crossover point.
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 16993 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: Is a de-esser necessary for mixing vocals?

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

Exalted Wombat wrote:He's using THREE mics. You'd think they could have got a decent recording from one of them!

:) Amusing... but probably unfair. I suspect the headset radio mic is being used for the lecture-theatre PA, and the lavalier radio mic for the video recording. The lectern mic is probably unused... but it sounds to me like that chap has an unfortunate tooth-whistle which is always going to be very hard to resolve at the console!

H
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 43701 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: Is a de-esser necessary for mixing vocals?

Post by Mike Stranks »

dred2009 wrote:
The Elf wrote:Most DAWs come with a de-esser in their armoury. Tell us a bit about where you're wanting to host this de-esser and we may find you already have it!

I use Mixcraft 7 pro edition. I believe it does not have a De Esser, but I could be wrong.

So do I! The 'bundled' de-esser is called Lisp x64... I tend to use Spitfish more though...
Mike Stranks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 10589 Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Is a de-esser necessary for mixing vocals?

Post by manhattan »

dred2009 wrote:I would like to know:

Where do I download a good free de-esser;

if a de-esser plugin is necessary for mixing vocals;

if it's possible to remove the sibilance with just an EQ;

and what's the difference between a de-esser and an EQ.

Thank you all in advance.

There are no good free de-essers. Most de-essers that come in DAW's aren't that good. Most de-esser's actually aren't that good for vocals.

A de-esser is not necessary for mixing vocals, it's more the lazy way to do it.

Some of these guys have some good ways to use de-essers creatively for other things, which is quite frankly what they seem better for.

The best way to de-ess is simply to edit the waveform, and do sharp narrow q drops in volume on the waveform during sibilant moments. This is a more transparent way to do it.

If you stack vocals it is a bit painstaking, but if you don't, then it's really the only way to do it.

One of the better de-essers I found was the Massey De-Esser.
Last edited by manhattan on Fri Jan 18, 2019 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
manhattan
Poster
Posts: 17 Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:38 pm
Post Reply