Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Discuss hardware/software tools and techniques involved in capturing sound, in the studio, live or on location.
Post Reply

Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Sam Spoons »

This is just a curiosity post but I always set my desks up the same way, live or in the studio and the track layout on in Reaper usually matches too.

What do you do, and do you change it around or is it always the same?

FWIW I start with drums on Ch1 (kick, snare, hats, toms low to high, overheads) then Bass, Electric Guitar/s, Acoustic Guitars, Keys, Brass (when present) and Vocals (L-R across the stage then any behind). If I have the channels I'll leave a spare between the backline and Vox. Any media players usually at the far right (Ch 15-16)
User avatar
Sam Spoons
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 22193 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
People often mistake me for a grown-up because of my age.

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Wonks »

Sam Spoons wrote:FWIW I start with drums on Ch1 (kick, snare, hats, toms low to high, overheads)

That's a lot of mic inputs on a single channel! :D
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 18660 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Reading, UK
Reliably fallible.

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by James Perrett »

I'm the same as you Sam - it is just an old habit that still works for me.
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 16343 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Sam Spoons »

Wonks wrote:
Sam Spoons wrote:FWIW I start with drums on Ch1 (kick, snare, hats, toms low to high, overheads)

That's a lot of mic inputs on a single channel! :D

You just can't get the staff these days :headbang:
User avatar
Sam Spoons
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 22193 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
People often mistake me for a grown-up because of my age.

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Wonks »

:D
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 18660 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Reading, UK
Reliably fallible.

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Sam Spoons »

James Perrett wrote:I'm the same as you Sam - it is just an old habit that still works for me.

Another odd thing I've noticed, while I have the toms corresponding to how I see them, sound guys who play drums have them laid out as if they were sitting behind the kit. Seems logical I guess but leads to confusion if we're sharing a desk........
User avatar
Sam Spoons
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 22193 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
People often mistake me for a grown-up because of my age.

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by CS70 »

Drum tracks, bass, guitar tracks, vox, double vox, other stuff. Vox are generally "right" in the mixer or "down" on the DAW busses, just a habit but I tend to end up with that schema pretty much all the times.
User avatar
CS70
Longtime Poster
Posts: 7799 Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 12:00 am Location: Oslo, Norway
Silver Spoon - Check out our latest video and the FB page

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Dave B »

My usual one is : Kick, Snare, OH L, OH R, Bass, Guitar, (spare), (spare), Vox1, vox 2, vox3, vox4, keys L, keys R, (spare), click.

This is based on the idea of having 2 8-way stage boxes - front and back. The backline goes into one 'block' and the rest at the front. This is so that if we play a small place and don't need to mic up, we can just use the front box - everything that will always be mic'd up (regardless of venue) goes to the main block.

I tend to work this way with DAW / studio mixers as well. (ok .. keys may come before vox there). It just seems a logical layout to me.

Saying that, at the last live sound gig I did, I found that I'd set up DCA faders and they seemed to be a bit random - I think I went guitars, vox, bvs, keys, (rest) which kind of made sense for the band I was mixing .. but I'm not sure I'd do it like that again.
User avatar
Dave B
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5935 Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 12:00 am Location: Maidenhead
Veni, Vidi, Aesculi (I came, I saw, I conkered)

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Drew Stephenson »

Hmmm. For the DAW I have templates for each instrument, so vocals, for example, have a main channel, a de-esser channel, a parallel compression channel, two-channels of vca shenanigans to do fader rides from my control surface (see Mike Senior's article here: https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques ... tting-trim), and then a bit of vocal reverb. These all load in together with all the respective sends and plug-ins loaded. Similarly I have drum, bass and reverb templates with various degrees of complexity. These all feed a bus template that always sits on channels 33-40 and goes Vox, Drums, Bass, Guitar 1, Guitar 2, Keys, Candy, Dummy Master. Obviously stuff is only used where necessary but that covers most of my regular bases.
In terms of the templates I tend to be fairly consistent on Vox, Drums, then Bass, but after that it varies. And stuff does get moved around if I've got more than 32 tracks going on and want to be using the control surface as a channel strip.

Live is much simpler as we're playing much smaller venues, so that's Vox 1, 2 and 3, Acoustic, Organ, Kick - and that generally does the trick. On a couple of larger occasions I've added Snare, Bass, electric G1 and G2 as well just to give whoever's on the desk a little bit of control.
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru
Posts: 28798 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Drew Stephenson »

Sam Spoons wrote: Another odd thing I've noticed, while I have the toms corresponding to how I see them, sound guys who play drums have them laid out as if they were sitting behind the kit. Seems logical I guess but leads to confusion if we're sharing a desk........

I've seen a few drummer sound guys do this live and recorded and it drives me nuts because it messes with my image in my head of how the music is being played.
I think the argument is that drummers are the only ones who notice this stuff and therefore it makes sense to lay them out like that, but I think that's insulting the musical knowledge of your audience a bit.

Hmmm, it's a long way down from this high horse, mayhap I should dismount.
#firstworldproblems
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru
Posts: 28798 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by James Perrett »

Sam Spoons wrote: Another odd thing I've noticed, while I have the toms corresponding to how I see them, sound guys who play drums have them laid out as if they were sitting behind the kit. Seems logical I guess but leads to confusion if we're sharing a desk........

Maybe I know too many drummer sound people but just about everyone I know (even those who don't play anything) has the smallest tom on the left and the floor tom on the rightmost tom channel. In fact, I can't remember ever walking up to a desk in a venue that was set up in the way you describe. On the other hand, most engineers seem to set up the vocals how they see them.
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 16343 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Drew Stephenson »

::: shakes puny fist in impotent rage :::

;)
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru
Posts: 28798 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Sam Spoons »

James Perrett wrote:
Sam Spoons wrote: Another odd thing I've noticed, while I have the toms corresponding to how I see them, sound guys who play drums have them laid out as if they were sitting behind the kit. Seems logical I guess but leads to confusion if we're sharing a desk........

Maybe I know too many drummer sound people but just about everyone I know (even those who don't play anything) has the smallest tom on the left and the floor tom on the rightmost tom channel. In fact, I can't remember ever walking up to a desk in a venue that was set up in the way you describe. On the other hand, most engineers seem to set up the vocals how they see them.

Given that we mostly run PA systems in mono having the toms 'back to front' doesn't matter from an audience perspective (if it was stereo it would, obviously) but, if you are setting the vox up 'as seen from the desk' why would you do the drums differently unless you are a drummer and automatically see them from a drummers POV?
User avatar
Sam Spoons
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 22193 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
People often mistake me for a grown-up because of my age.

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Bob Bickerton »

For live sound I generally have kick/snare/toms L to R as I see them/HH/OH L-R/Bass/Keys/Gats/Horns/Voxes - all left to right as I see them. I do work in stereo depending on the venue (and I do mainly concert work) as I like to create a sense of spaciousness for most people, knowing the balance may be compromised a little for some people.

There is no logic to my mind in assigning tracks from a drummer perspective but then not being a drummer, I have the where-with-all to think logically........... :o:o:o:beamup:

Recording has a similar track setup on the rare occasion I record bands.

Bob
User avatar
Bob Bickerton
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5518 Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 12:00 am Location: Nelson, New Zealand

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Dave B »

I've just realised that I'd never considered the drum facing issue before! I tend to work in smaller venues so I only have a stereo overhead pair usually, but even then, I should really make sure that the sound matches the audience or it will be weird...

For recording, I always have drums panned as per the drummer. I've discussed it before with another engineer and I always see a recording as being from the band's perspective.
User avatar
Dave B
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5935 Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 12:00 am Location: Maidenhead
Veni, Vidi, Aesculi (I came, I saw, I conkered)

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by James Perrett »

And whenever I've soundchecked as a drummer no-one has ever asked me to hit the floor tom first.
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 16343 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Wonks »

James Perrett wrote:And whenever I've soundchecked as a drummer no-one has ever asked me to hit the floor tom first.

Normally the bass player to get them to shut up.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 18660 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Reading, UK
Reliably fallible.

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by The Korff »

Sam Spoons wrote:FWIW I start with drums on Ch1 (kick, snare, hats, toms low to high, overheads) then Bass, Electric Guitar/s, Acoustic Guitars, Keys, Brass (when present) and Vocals (L-R across the stage then any behind). If I have the channels I'll leave a spare between the backline and Vox. Any media players usually at the far right (Ch 15-16)

Exactly the same! I can't remember why, but I've always done it that way. (And if I haven't got enough channels to leave a gap to keep the vocals separate, I'll swap some of the channel and bus fader caps around so that the vocals are a different colour to the rest of them.)
The Korff
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2279 Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:28 am Location: The Wrong Precinct

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by The Elf »

Dave B wrote:For recording, I always have drums panned as per the drummer. I've discussed it before with another engineer and I always see a recording as being from the band's perspective.

If I was mixing drums live I'd pan the kit from audience perspective. Generally I don't do live mixes!

In the studio I invariably choose dummer's perspective. For a right-handed kit the 'story' of a tom roll reading from left to right just feels 'right'.
User avatar
The Elf
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 21225 Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Drew Stephenson »

apart from you all being wrong about the drum thing... ;) I do have a question on the live mixing approach.
I generally put lead vocals on 1 as I find that it's generally the thing I have to work most during a gig, and frequently it's the channel most prone to generating howlround. Having it always on 1 makes it quicker for me to find in a hurry (singer sticking his mic into the bell of the saxophone during a solo for example!) rather than having it *somewhere* over on the other side of the desk.
Is this just not a problem other people have or am I just demonstrating my lack of chops? (or both of the above).
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru
Posts: 28798 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Wonks »

I'm normally with you, Drew. vocals first.

Though I'm sure if doing this professionally at large stage level, I'm sure it helps to have a standardised way of laying things out, so if mixing person A has to leave the desk, mixing person B can step in and immediately know where the faders should be. And on a big live desk, (say 32-48 channels plus sub-busses), with you sat in the middle of the desk, having the most feedback-prone mics channel on the far left and out of direct view isn't the best way to arrange things. Obviously Far less of an issue with an 8-16 channel compact desk don at the Dog and Duck.

But if you are used to the big desks, then you'll use the same methodology on the smaller desks, and you'll pass that methodology on to others.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 18660 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Reading, UK
Reliably fallible.

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Drew Stephenson »

Ah, yes, that makes a lot of sense.
Thanks Wonks :)
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru
Posts: 28798 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: Track/Channel layout for recording, mixing and live?

Post by Sam Spoons »

When I've used bigger 'split' desks (up to a 40 channel ML3000) I always liked to have the vocals as the first channels to the right of the master section, if not I like them in the middle close to the master section. These days, with digital, I'll have them near the middle/right but with the LCD scribble strips colour coded.

I've never thought of swapping fader caps, brilliant idea :clap: , though I probably would have lost at least one in the process :headbang: I just used to use coloured LX tape to draw the eye and label the vox channels.
User avatar
Sam Spoons
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 22193 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
People often mistake me for a grown-up because of my age.
Post Reply