I had been intending to get a pair of Neumann KH120 monitors, but after some helpful forum posts and more research am now leaning towards the KH80 DSP monitors. There isn’t much difference in price, so I’m evaluating them only based on their performance.
The accuracy of the KH80’ seems superb.
If I’m reading the data on Neumann’s site correctly, it states that the reproduction accuracy between 100 Hz and 10 kHz is actually better than the KH120 and KH 310.
The features offered by having the DSP are attractive such as the FIR phase correction, and that it optimises the sound output through guided alignment. My room will have acoustic treatment (bass traps, wall tiles for flutter echo, some broadband absorption) but is not a purpose built studio so I think these could help me.
The KH80’s have SPL that is over what I would normally mix at.
My concerns with the KH80’s: the digital converter and sampling rate is 48kHz, whereas some other DSP monitors go up to 98Khz. Is this going to give me an audible difference in quality? As far as I’ve read human hearing doesn’t go up to those frequencies any way but changes that high can make an audible difference to what we do hear.
The bass extension on the KH80’s is 57 Hz, only 5 Hz above that of the KH 120’s. How critical are those lower 5Hz to getting an accurate mix? It seems a small difference, at least on paper.
Finally, are the KH80’s going to be able to give me a sufficient quality of monitoring to produce release-quality, commercial mixes? I know that this is a vague question that I should probably be lambasted for, but I still have the notion that speakers of this size and relatively low cost would not give me all I would need. This is probably a prejudice, but still they are tiny!
If I get them, I will buy from a stockist that accepts returns so I will have the time to demo them and mix a few songs on them before deciding whether to keep.
Thanks in advance for any replies
