Good hardware EQ for instrument shaping.
Good hardware EQ for instrument shaping.
I’m using a combination of mixer EQ and software for my electric piano sounds, it’s sort of OK, but I’m not getting what I need, the EQ in Reaper just never seems to hit the spot, the mixer EQ is better, but a bit of a blunt instrument.
I need a good rack EQ, parametric I guess, but I’ve even been thinking of a graphic, just wondering where to look for something suitable.
I need a good rack EQ, parametric I guess, but I’ve even been thinking of a graphic, just wondering where to look for something suitable.
Last edited by Arpangel on Sat Mar 28, 2020 8:53 am, edited 3 times in total.
"I will not say: do not weep; for not all tears are an evil" Gandalf - J.R.R. Tolkien.
Re: Good hardware EQ for instrument shaping.
Vangelis used to use graphic eq's a lot. Worked out well for him I think!
- Tomás Mulcahy
Frequent Poster -
Posts: 3007 Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Cork, Ireland.
Contact:
Re: Good hardware EQ for instrument shaping.
Tomás Mulcahy wrote:Vangelis used to use graphic eq's a lot. Worked out well for him I think!
Yeah, seems like the way to go, Brian Eno said the same thing, so it must be right.
Trouble is getting a good deep cut/boost, most are about 10 dB and it’s best to have at least 15 dB
Last edited by Arpangel on Sat Mar 28, 2020 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I will not say: do not weep; for not all tears are an evil" Gandalf - J.R.R. Tolkien.
Re: Good hardware EQ for instrument shaping.
Debatable. A short range hurts the sound less, and gives finer control for a given fader length.
dbx 1231 is nice to work with, switchable +/-6 or +/-15dB range. Even with all faders at 0, the phase shift is audible- I think this is inevitable with a graphic.
I guess you've already considered using a different EP? Are you using a real one or a digital one? There's a lot can be done to a Rhodes or a Wurli to change the sound, but it's mechanical work and potentially risky. Just running them through different amps can give a huge range of possibilities. The Arturia Wurli model is rather good IME, lots of tweakage and nothing to break
dbx 1231 is nice to work with, switchable +/-6 or +/-15dB range. Even with all faders at 0, the phase shift is audible- I think this is inevitable with a graphic.
I guess you've already considered using a different EP? Are you using a real one or a digital one? There's a lot can be done to a Rhodes or a Wurli to change the sound, but it's mechanical work and potentially risky. Just running them through different amps can give a huge range of possibilities. The Arturia Wurli model is rather good IME, lots of tweakage and nothing to break
Last edited by Tomás Mulcahy on Sat Mar 28, 2020 5:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Tomás Mulcahy
Frequent Poster -
Posts: 3007 Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Cork, Ireland.
Contact:
Re: Good hardware EQ for instrument shaping.
I don’t know what Reaper’s eq is like but I suggest two or more software eq modules in series, a parametric to cut offending frequencies and then a standard four band eq to do the broad sweeps of cut and/or boost e.g. roll off bass and add air frequencies at the top.
If the annoying frequencies change with pitch of the notes then you’ll need a dynamic equaliser.
You don’t say what’s wrong with the sound you’re getting currently.
If the annoying frequencies change with pitch of the notes then you’ll need a dynamic equaliser.
You don’t say what’s wrong with the sound you’re getting currently.
Re: Good hardware EQ for instrument shaping.
MOF wrote: If the annoying frequencies change with pitch of the notes then you’ll need a dynamic equaliser.
O ya, good point. TDR Kotelnikov is one of the best I think. Oeksound Soothe is even better, that thing is amazing goes way beyond mere dynamic eq. Tracks the resonances.
- Tomás Mulcahy
Frequent Poster -
Posts: 3007 Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Cork, Ireland.
Contact:
Re: Good hardware EQ for instrument shaping.
MOF wrote:I don’t know what Reaper’s eq is like but I suggest two or more software eq modules in series, a parametric to cut offending frequencies and then a standard four band eq to do the broad sweeps of cut and/or boost e.g. roll off bass and add air frequencies at the top.
If the annoying frequencies change with pitch of the notes then you’ll need a dynamic equaliser.
You don’t say what’s wrong with the sound you’re getting currently.
Yes, I’m open to software too.
I’m using a Yamaha Reface CP, it’s OK, acceptable, but not in its raw state.
I have my own Rhodes preferences, influenced by classic 70’s sounds, it’s a slightly hard sound, a bit of bass cut, and a big peak at 1.5k, and I roll everything off to zero above about 7k, it gives me that lovely 70's Chick Corea type vibe, with just a hint of tine.
I’m finding it very difficult to EQ out the tine on the Reface, it’s way too much, but finding the right frequency is really difficult.
Last edited by Arpangel on Sat Mar 28, 2020 5:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"I will not say: do not weep; for not all tears are an evil" Gandalf - J.R.R. Tolkien.
Re: Good hardware EQ for instrument shaping.
Arpangel wrote: I’m finding it very difficult to EQ out the tine on the Reface, it’s way too much, but finding the right frequency is really difficult.
Oekesound Soothe solves exactly that problem, in seconds.
I use Modart Pianoteq Stage for my CP80. Didn't take long to adjust the eq, effects and amp model to my tastes. It's lovely, very dynamic and responsive. Maybe that plugin would suit you better than a Reface. The Pro version is incredibly tweakable: "Thousands of editable overtones", on a note by note basis, if you want!
Last edited by Tomás Mulcahy on Sat Mar 28, 2020 5:39 pm, edited 4 times in total.
- Tomás Mulcahy
Frequent Poster -
Posts: 3007 Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Cork, Ireland.
Contact:
Re: Good hardware EQ for instrument shaping.
Tomás Mulcahy wrote:Arpangel wrote: I’m finding it very difficult to EQ out the tine on the Reface, it’s way too much, but finding the right frequency is really difficult.
Oekesound Soothe solves exactly that problem, in seconds.
I use Modart Pianoteq Stage for my CP80. Didn't take long to adjust the eq, effects and amp model to my tastes. It's lovely, very dynamic and responsive. Maybe that plugin would suit you better than a Reface. The Pro version is incredibly tweakable: "Thousands of editable overtones", on a note by note basis, if you want!
Thanks Tomas, I need a hardware solution though, as when things get back to normal I’d like to gig, and I don’t want to use a computer for that. I’m OK with software at the moment, and I think that would be a more sensible solution than spending lots on hardware, as I’m sort of thinking about getting either a real Rhodes for gigging in the future, or something like a Vintage Vibe.
The Rhodes really is the basis of a lot of what I’m doing now, and it's worth investing in.
I’m actually also, using an EP from the Kontakt library, and it’s not bad, so I alternate between the the Reface and Kontakt.
"I will not say: do not weep; for not all tears are an evil" Gandalf - J.R.R. Tolkien.
Re: Good hardware EQ for instrument shaping.
Tomás Mulcahy wrote:Arpangel wrote: I’m finding it very difficult to EQ out the tine on the Reface, it’s way too much, but finding the right frequency is really difficult.
Oekesound Soothe solves exactly that problem, in seconds.
Since Tony already has Reaper, I'd suggest that ReaFIR in compression mode would be a good alternative to Soothe.
- James Perrett
Moderator -
Posts: 16990 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am
Location: The wilds of Hampshire
Contact:
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page
Re: Good hardware EQ for instrument shaping.
James Perrett wrote:Tomás Mulcahy wrote:Arpangel wrote: I’m finding it very difficult to EQ out the tine on the Reface, it’s way too much, but finding the right frequency is really difficult.
Oekesound Soothe solves exactly that problem, in seconds.
Since Tony already has Reaper, I'd suggest that ReaFIR in compression mode would be a good alternative to Soothe.
I always have trouble getting my head around ReaFIR, what I’m finding strange about this tine sound, is that it sounds like it should be in to 7/8k range, but it’s way below that, and it diminishes a bit when I start to attenuate around 2/3k.....weird.
"I will not say: do not weep; for not all tears are an evil" Gandalf - J.R.R. Tolkien.
Re: Good hardware EQ for instrument shaping.
If you can put up a sample (or send me a link via PM if you prefer) I can create a Reaper session with some basic ReaFIR settings for you if you would like. I've only really discovered the power of ReaFIR recently and now find that I use it quite a bit on problem sources where I might have used eq before.
- James Perrett
Moderator -
Posts: 16990 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am
Location: The wilds of Hampshire
Contact:
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page
Re: Good hardware EQ for instrument shaping.
James Perrett wrote:If you can put up a sample (or send me a link via PM if you prefer) I can create a Reaper session with some basic ReaFIR settings for you if you would like. I've only really discovered the power of ReaFIR recently and now find that I use it quite a bit on problem sources where I might have used eq before.
Thanks James, I’ll put a sample link up if I don’t have any joy, I’ve found this guy on YouTube with a delightful New York accent
"I will not say: do not weep; for not all tears are an evil" Gandalf - J.R.R. Tolkien.