Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

For everything after the recording stage: hardware/software and how you use it.
Post Reply

Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by Martin Walker »

Hi guys,
Following our brief discussion and confusion yesterday evening about the difference between multiband compression and dynamic EQ, I've tracked down this well-written couple of paragraphs from Paul White, as part of his review of the SOnnox oxford Dynamic EQ:

"The difference between a multiband compressor and a dynamic equaliser is subtle and sometimes misunderstood. Their roles do overlap to some degree, and both work by splitting the signal into multiple frequency bands, but they aren’t identical. Multiband compressors use crossovers with a slope that is usually fixed, even if the crossover frequency is variable, and process each of the resulting frequency bands separately before recombining them, whereas a dynamic EQ applies the gain change directly to the gain parameters of a multiband parametric equaliser.

Both designs have their pros and cons. The crossovers used in a multiband compressor can introduce unwanted and audible phase shifts, and a parametric EQ is more ‘tuneable’ than a simple band-splitting system; if necessary, EQ bands can also be made to overlap. A multiband dynamics processor also differs from typical dynamic equalisers in that as the amount of boost or cut increases, the bandwidth remains constant. By contrast, many equalisers exhibit ‘proportional Q’ response, where the bandwidth narrows with increasing gain or attenuation, and this can often sound more natural."


We were essentially correct during our discussions, but the above is a far clearer explanation ;)

Review here if you want to read more: https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/so ... dynamic-eq

Martin
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 22581 Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:44 am Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by The Elf »

I've always thought of both of them as being essentially 'dynamic EQ', though I can appreciate the differences. In practical terms I doubt it makes a huge difference.
User avatar
The Elf
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 21437 Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by Martin Walker »

The Elf wrote:I've always thought of both of them as being essentially 'dynamic EQ', though I can appreciate the differences. In practical terms I doubt it makes a huge difference.

Agreed - hence our collective confusion ;)
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 22581 Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:44 am Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by Drew Stephenson »

I guess if you started getting really heavy with the compression you might start getting some phase artefacts, but at that point you're probably trying to roll it in glitter anyway...

Thanks Martin. :thumbup:
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru
Posts: 29727 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by Sam Spoons »

I have a TC Finalizer Plus, bought from a mate's studio when his business partner sold up after he succumbed to cancer. Not sure exactly how it works but, used carefully, it definitely adds a little fairy dust. They used to refer to it as "The Turd Polisher" :D
User avatar
Sam Spoons
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 22920 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
Still mourning the loss of my 'Jedi Poster" status :)

People often mistake me for a grown-up because of my age.

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by Folderol »

I must admit I was finding the discussion all rather confusing. This clarifies it a lot.
User avatar
Folderol
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 20891 Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:00 am Location: The Mudway Towns, UK
Seemingly no longer an 'elderly'.
Now a 'Senior'. Is that promotion?

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by Sam Inglis »

One practical difference is that a good dynamic EQ should allow you to set up very narrow bands, so you could use it for instance to notch out occasional feedback in a live recording. That's not usually possible with multiband compressors.
Sam Inglis
Moderator
Posts: 3229 Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 12:00 am

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by Eddy Deegan »

Sam Spoons wrote:I have a TC Finalizer Plus, bought from a mate's studio when his business partner sold up after he succumbed to cancer. Not sure exactly how it works but, used carefully, it definitely adds a little fairy dust. They used to refer to it as "The Turd Polisher" :D

I've got a TC Finalizer 96k which I bought about 10 years ago in a momentary lapse of reason. I've never used it in anger, although it does look a fairly capable piece of kit.

Back in '94 I released an album involving synths and guitar (the latter played by someone else) which I "mastered", using the term very loosely in retrospect, through a TC Finalizer Express and although at the time I liked what it did I have regretted it ever since as I kind of butchered it and the multitracks are long lost, though I do have the sequencer files. It's listenable but could be a lot better.

So the Finalizer 96k sits on the shelf unused. I turn it on once in a while to warm the circuits and I've done a few tests with it that seem to sound rather nice but I think Ozone 9 is a better bet although part of me really wants to get to the point where I can a) use the Finalizer properly and b) know if/when/why I should do so over Ozone. There is a c) involving acoustic treatment and my studio but that plan is underway. Whether a) and b) comprise a pipe dream I don't know but it's a handsome decoration in the meantime so I've not lost sleep over it.
Last edited by Eddy Deegan on Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:24 am, edited 8 times in total.
User avatar
Eddy Deegan
Moderator
Posts: 9988 Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:00 am Location: Brighton & Hove, UK
Some of my works | The SOS Forum Album projects | My Jamuary 2025 & 2026 works

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by Zukan »

That used to be the case Martin but MBCs have variable crossovers now - FabFilter's MBC being an example. Everything else in that wonderful article is bang on.
Last edited by Zukan on Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Zukan
Moderator
Posts: 10135 Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 12:00 am
'Shaka. When the walls fell. Zukan...with his arms wide.'

1-2-1 Tuition

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by CS70 »

I always thought it is more a matter of perspective and control interface - if you like to think in terms of threshold, attack and release and makeup gain, or in terms of gain, shape and Q..

Sometimes it comes natural to me to think in terms of one or or the other, depending on the task. But I guess it makes little difference in practice.
User avatar
CS70
Longtime Poster
Posts: 7799 Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 12:00 am Location: Oslo, Norway
Silver Spoon - Check out our latest video and the FB page

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by CS70 »

Eddy Deegan wrote: So the Finalizer 96k sits on the shelf unused. I turn it on once in a while to warm the circuits and I've done a few tests with it that seem to sound rather nice but I think Ozone 9 is a better bet although part of me really wants to get to the point where I can a) use the Finalizer properly and b) know if/when/why I should do so over Ozone. There is a c) involving acoustic treatment and my studio but that plan is underway. Whether a) and b) comprise a pipe dream I don't know but it's a handsome decoration in the meantime so I've not lost sleep over it.

I've played with one a little - the Finalizer is a cool piece of kit but it doesn't do anything that Ozone can't do, while the opposite isn't true (for example, the Finalizer MB comp's got only 3 bands).

Back when it came out it was awesome because it packaged many boxes into one (so I've heard... back then all I knew of audio was the engineer on the other side of the glass in the control room).. massive saving in space and money and really good quality. Now of course that's no longer an issue at all for most people.

About quality - within what they both can do - there's little difference: nobody would be able to tell what you've used - so long of course you know what you're doing.

The haptics are as always the main difference. I don't do mastering (except to pseudo-master demos so they sound good to the band), but while I do like Ozone and I think it's brilliant, I always find it hard to really tweak it - so many controls, so little space and the mouse feels exactly the same everywhere.. you have no physical feedback. Especially the MB compressor, I find it hard to really work it.

With the Finalizer, you don't look much - you just push the "band" and "parameter" buttons and turn the knobs while listening (or at most looking at the meter). It's not as good as an actual MB compressor where you have separate knobs for each band and control, but more direct than any plugin can be, simply because you have the physical feel of rotating the knob.

With these things it's just a matter of trying enough to become comfortable with it and see if it makes your life easier or not (or more fun!).

It still looks really cool tough, which is no bad reason for having it in a rack! (or have a rack in the first place) :D
Last edited by CS70 on Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:23 am, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
CS70
Longtime Poster
Posts: 7799 Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 12:00 am Location: Oslo, Norway
Silver Spoon - Check out our latest video and the FB page

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by Zukan »

CS70 wrote:
Sometimes it comes natural to me to think in terms of one or or the other, depending on the task. But I guess it makes little difference in practice.

TBH CS, I never really think about it. I just use what there is for a given task. Nowadays, more and more dynamic processors are coming with additional tools that grey the area between one process to another.
User avatar
Zukan
Moderator
Posts: 10135 Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 12:00 am
'Shaka. When the walls fell. Zukan...with his arms wide.'

1-2-1 Tuition

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by shufflebeat »

Unlike Fol, I might be a little bit more confused that I was.

What I'm taking from this is:

1) The concepts come from specific hardware inspiration, hence the different names and approaches,

2) They overlap in the sense that they are sensitive to specific frequencies at input and react to modify the gain at that frequency range, depending on a) defined crossover points (MBC) or b) defined frequency and bandwidth Q (DynEQ),

3) They can be employed to solve similar problems and do it in a similar way, i.e., control the gain of a defined Hz band, dependant on input.

I'm less fussy than some in what I'll consider acceptable so the nuances are probably lost on me. If there's not much more than that then I'm happy enough to carry on with MBC without fearing I'm missing out.
Last edited by shufflebeat on Fri Jul 03, 2020 10:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
shufflebeat
Jedi Poster
Posts: 10113 Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:00 am Location: Manchester, UK
“…I can tell you I don't have money, but what I do have are a very particular set of skills. Skills I have acquired over a very long career” - (folk musician, Manchester).

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by CS70 »

Zukan wrote:
CS70 wrote:
Sometimes it comes natural to me to think in terms of one or or the other, depending on the task. But I guess it makes little difference in practice.

TBH CS, I never really think about it. I just use what there is for a given task. Nowadays, more and more dynamic processors are coming with additional tools that grey the area between one process to another.

Yes indeed. I guess it's just habit.. the first time I had to solve a specific problem (for example, I had fret noise on an electric bass line I'd received) I thought "hey, why not squash down only the upper frequencies when they go over a certain limit" and set up a MB compressor to nuke the band using a threshold/attack/release frame of mind. It worked perfectly so if I've just stuck with it every time that kind of issue appears.

With guitar parts for example I started by thinking in terms of EQ, it worked and that's what I've done ever since :)
User avatar
CS70
Longtime Poster
Posts: 7799 Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 12:00 am Location: Oslo, Norway
Silver Spoon - Check out our latest video and the FB page

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by Bob Bickerton »

Thanks for digging that reference out Martin, I think that helps me.

Even though they apparently can do similar things I’ve always considered (perhaps erroneously) that multi-band compression is something I’d use on a buss, usually master buss, whereas dynamic eq is something I’d apply to a track which requires attention. So I guess I view multi-band compression as a finishing tool whereas dynamic EQ is an incisive tool.

As I mentioned in the conversation, I stopped using multi-band compression sometime ago - maybe because I’m better now at sorting out problems further up the chain - or maybe not :(

Bob
User avatar
Bob Bickerton
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5642 Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 12:00 am Location: Nelson, New Zealand

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by The Elf »

I do a lot of work with acoustic guitar, and that often needs some deep notch EQ to tame resonances. I find that a dynamic EQ does less harm than a static one - the resonance is dipped when it appears, but the guitar's tone is left alone when the cut isn't required.
User avatar
The Elf
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 21437 Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by shufflebeat »

This is where I first encountered MBC, trying to rescue a stereo "acoustic" recording where the double bass had a bit of a "woof" at the same spot where the guitar sounded nice. I wanted to take out the nasty where it popped up without destroying the nice.

In my reading round I've seen that ReaFir can be harness to listen to one track while controlling another by way of dynamic EQ. This looks potentially useful to cobble together a ducking process in a folder or buss. Is it common to other approaches?
shufflebeat
Jedi Poster
Posts: 10113 Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:00 am Location: Manchester, UK
“…I can tell you I don't have money, but what I do have are a very particular set of skills. Skills I have acquired over a very long career” - (folk musician, Manchester).

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by ManFromGlass »

I’ve been relying on these to help clean up my mixes but am now reading as much as I can about Oeksound’s Soothe 2. I am getting the impression that I could move to this plugin and save time and get a better results, particularly as my hi frequency hearing is diminishing yearly.
Here is the SOS review -
https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/oeksound-soothe-2

Does anybody else have any real world experiences with this plug?
User avatar
ManFromGlass
Longtime Poster
Posts: 7866 Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:00 am Location: O Canada

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by Urthlupe »

ManFromGlass wrote:Does anybody else have any real world experiences with this plug?

Yup, I use Soothe2 - and a bunch of multiband dynamics and dynamic eq plugins.

What d’ya wanna know bud?

Loopy
User avatar
Urthlupe
Frequent Poster
Posts: 615 Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:00 am Location: West Midlands/Pembrokeshire UK

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by ManFromGlass »

You may have answered my question - I was assuming Soothe would replace dynamic eq and multiband compressors. I suspect it’s the right tool for the right job scenario.
Soothe sounds like it could replace the other 2 but I guess it depends on the track and/or mix and how you hear it in your head.
Am I close?
Last edited by ManFromGlass on Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ManFromGlass
Longtime Poster
Posts: 7866 Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:00 am Location: O Canada

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by Urthlupe »

ManFromGlass wrote:You may have answered my question - I was assuming Soothe would replace dynamic eq and multiband compressors. I suspect it’s the right tool for the right job scenario.
Soothe sounds like it could replace the other 2 but I guess it depends on the track and/or mix and how you hear it in your head.
Am I close?

This is a confusing area bud - maybe because the s’ware developers are being really creative in creating tools that combine what might previously have been separate functions. Very cool.... :-)

Having said that..... to generalise at a basic level, the differences between a multiband compressor and dynamic eq are these....

1. The MB has fixed crossover networks which are always functional, the Dyn EQ does not, it only functions once the signal crosses the threshold and then dynamically. Any resulting phase shift is therefore always present in the MB, but dynamically present in the Dyn EQ.

2. An MB compressor only compresses, an MB expander only expands, a Dyn EQ offers both cut and boost. There are many MB devices now though that offer both expansion and compression, or combinations of upward and downward varieties of either - but this conversation began as a consideration of Dyn EQ vs MB compression.

3. Bands in an MB device instated via crossover networks cannot overlap, Dyn EQ’s can.

There are other differences by type......

So yup, this is horses for courses, often the tools are interchangeable and often the plugs now hybridise - which means you might simply prefer one developer’s take (or pricing structure....:-) and then use just use that across the board.

So what is Soothe? It’s a bit different. It tries to identify resonance buildups and then dynamically apply attenuation to those frequencies - in the hundreds of bands. It looks a bit like an eq or a dynamic device because in v2 it now allows you to control it’s functioning by tailoring it’s response (or detection?) via traditional looking eq tools and includes control over processing envelope (attack and release). It’s a bit ace actually. Recently used it all over a trombone quartet album which we recorded in a beautiful sounding church - but somehow had collected occasionally a bit of mid range buildup. Whoops.

I use ‘em all, but mostly because I’ve been at this a very long time (since way before computers......) so have simply collected them over the years. I like to look at myself as a ‘Plugin Curator’..... :-). I use Soothe though as a shaper.... surgical it ain’t.

Some of this stuff is expensive so my suggestion would be that you have a bit of understanding before you buy.... to that end (and without providing too much) maybe you might have a look at the excellent videos provided by Fabfilter.... in particular have a look at their Pro-MB and Pro-Q3 tutorials here....

https://www.fabfilter.com/video/

Maybe also take a squint at the ‘EQ linear phase vs minimum phase’ video as well while you’re on - but that’s another story....

Loopy
User avatar
Urthlupe
Frequent Poster
Posts: 615 Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:00 am Location: West Midlands/Pembrokeshire UK

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by ManFromGlass »

Thanks!
The Pro Q has been on my list and steadily moving to the top the more I hear from mixer friends how awesome it is.
The homework never stops in this biz :thumbup:
User avatar
ManFromGlass
Longtime Poster
Posts: 7866 Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:00 am Location: O Canada

Re: Dynamic EQ vs Multiband Compressor (ref Virtual Sosage meet eight)

Post by Drew Stephenson »

I make no apologies for dragging this up again as I've just come across this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWqqnY- ... EAPERMania
which shows how to use the standard free ReaEQ as a dynamic eq. :)
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru
Posts: 29727 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/
Post Reply