Parametric EQ without valves?

Discuss hardware/software tools and techniques involved in capturing sound, in the studio, live or on location.

Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by cc. »


Does any one make a nice sounding parametric EQ without valves anymore? The only one I've found is the focusrite red 2, but that's a bit on the expensive side.
User avatar
cc.
Poster
Posts: 92 Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 12:00 am Location: lisbon at the moment

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by Cruttox »

TFPro P9, also very expensive, but sweeeeeeeeeeeet
Cruttox
Posts: 1 Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:00 am

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by Microwave »

Presonus make a tiny one channel. It's cheap so it is feasible to get two. Do a Google search and it will come up. If you're on a very tight budget there's also the Behringer one, which is decent.

A.
User avatar
Microwave
Regular
Posts: 188 Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:00 am Location: London, Europe
Website

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by xandyreverex »

Alesis PEQ-450

2 stereo channels,
5 bands per channel, (you can Chain A+B for 10 bands)
q(with Hi and Lo Shelf), Frequency, Gain controls per band.
HPF + LPF for each channel

ermm yeah.
it's a nice eq, and nice price

Andy
xandyreverex
New here
Posts: 6 Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 12:00 am

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by cc. »


Thanks for the answers!!

TFPro P9, also very expensive, but sweeeeeeeeeeeet

Great, so now there are two that are too expensive :headbang:

Presonus make a tiny one channel. It's cheap so it is feasible to get two.

Interesting, I was thinking of spending more than that, but maybe I'll try one of these (the presonus eq3b I presume you mean) - Does it sound nice?


Alesis PEQ-450

I think that one is digital, I'm looking for an analog one.

Any onther ideas? Somewhere between the 100 euros of the presonus and the 2000 euros of the tfpro p9 :headbang:

Maybe I should just get a channel strip - there's much more choice there...
User avatar
cc.
Poster
Posts: 92 Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 12:00 am Location: lisbon at the moment

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by cc. »

Right, the next person who posts an expensive one gets reported to the moderators :bouncy::bouncy:

I was actually thinking about that diy calrec one - it looks pretty easy to make (the sontec one looks like a nightmare, but I guess it is much more sophisticated) - it was to put a stop to these diy thoughts that I decided to buy one!!!! But now you've got me thinking again (I even popped down to the basement and plugged in my UV box, to check it still worked after all these years)

:headbang:

Are you building either of these?
User avatar
cc.
Poster
Posts: 92 Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 12:00 am Location: lisbon at the moment

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by Scottdru »

I've heard some very good things about the Speck EQs as being relatively reasonably priced, and sounding very good for the money (Jack or Zoesch or maybe Max can probably speak more on this, I think).

FWIW, if you are looking for inexpensive/bang for the buck (particularly on ebay), you might try checking out one of the Rane parametric EQs (e.g., the PE17). I just picked up a Rane FMI 14 recently (basically an MS-1 preamp with an EQ section and inserts, etc.), and I'm finding the EQ on it quite good (most particularly in comparison to the Mackie or Behringer boards I've had my hands on over the last number of years, which isn't saying a whole lot ;)).

TBH, it's been so long since I've had my hands to a really good quality hardware parametric EQ (either on a proper studio desk or standalone), so I'm probably not the best one to take a recommendation from in this regard . . . but it might be worth at least checking one out yourself in the shop if you get a chance. Maybe someone will come along and say it's sh*t, but I can say it would be better than the cheap Presonus jobbie (which I wasn't particularly impressed with -- and I didn't like the Tubepre from that same series too much either).

I'd actually be curious if anyone here has used the Rane para EQs, and their impressions as to sound compared to some of the other EQs.
User avatar
Scottdru
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1149 Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 12:00 am Location: NYC: isle off the coast of Europe
Scott --Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by Frank Eleveld »

The Focusrite Green 2 (discontinued, but you might be able to pick one up s/h) is cheaper than the Red. It's solid-state, and very transparent and open.

Might worth trying out

Cheers
Frank
User avatar
Frank Eleveld
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1175 Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 12:00 am Location: NL

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by forumuser729356 »

Are you building either of these?

It's on my list
I have just about finished a 48v phantom power PSU to drive multiple mic pres (it generates 100mA - enough to power a shed load of condensers)
Next on the list is a dual 18v PSU to drive the actual boxes - after then I haven;t decided which one to do...
It's either the Calrec or a Amek Mozart Mic Pre (aka - the "Green Mic Pre" - the easiest one to build) or a Opto Compressor (the "What Compressor" - a updated "better" Joe Meek)
forumuser729356
Poster
Posts: 50 Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:00 am

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by mattneighbour »

I picked up a Focusrite Green 2 when Turnkey ( :roll: ) were selling them off cheap, it cost me £350 (they retailed at nearly £1k). It is only a single channel unit but has a Green series mic pre and is very nice! It excels at adding 'air' by boosting 12kHz - normal rules of 'do not boost excessively' need not apply!

Matt
User avatar
mattneighbour
New here
Posts: 7 Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by Nat »

I've built that Calrec EQ - it's a really, really nice EQ and cost something like £35 per channel - not bad, eh? It's the easiest thing I've bult from that site. The only little problem I had was lining up the holes on the faceplate with the buttons, but otherwise it was completely trouble free. I got the electronic side finished in about 2 hours as well, so you could probably have one up and running in the studio within a couple of days.
Nat
Posts: 3 Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2001 12:00 am

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by Scottdru »

Good to know, Nat. That's a pretty reasonable price for some good EQ, and it looks like it could be a good first project (for me, at least). I may just try that myself. Also, just a heads up in case you hadn't seen it yet, there is now a new DIY forum here, so I hope you (and some of the other DIYers around here) will jump in and share your experiences there. :)
User avatar
Scottdru
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1149 Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 12:00 am Location: NYC: isle off the coast of Europe
Scott --Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by sybil8 »

nat can where did you get the components? maplins?online?

regs
sybil8
Posts: 2 Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2000 12:00 am

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by RegressiveRock »

Alesis PEQ-450

2 stereo channels,
5 bands per channel, (you can Chain A+B for 10 bands)
q(with Hi and Lo Shelf), Frequency, Gain controls per band.
HPF + LPF for each channel

ermm yeah.
it's a nice eq, and nice price

Andy

Andy

I had one of those for a while and sold it on... It just wasn't my cup of tea... :frown:

Glad it suits you thoough... :lol:
User avatar
RegressiveRock
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1495 Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:00 am Location: Buntingford, Herts

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by forumuser729356 »

I put a list of component shops in the DIY section
forumuser729356
Poster
Posts: 50 Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:00 am

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by Stevedog »

A pair of the old Klark Teknik 31 band mono graphic equalisers would be an alternative.. I've seen them being sold of for silly prices at times.. worth checking PA companies selling gear. Might need a bit of TLC but they sound ..... Mmmmmmmm
User avatar
Stevedog
Regular
Posts: 346 Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:00 am

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by sybil8 »

ta
sybil8
Posts: 2 Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2000 12:00 am

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by cc. »


Interesting... I did see that Klark-Teknik DN405 other places too (although not that cheap) - are they any good? They seemed to be targetted more at live sound than studio use, but I'm not sure what that means...

(not that I'll buy that one given the mysteries of portuguese customs)
User avatar
cc.
Poster
Posts: 92 Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 12:00 am Location: lisbon at the moment

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by archdake mkII »

Another vote for Speck's EQ here!
User avatar
archdake mkII
Regular
Posts: 139 Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:00 am

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by dmills »

How about the Rane unit, cost is reasonable and it doesn't suck (Even if it has a few bells and whistles that are not really required).

The KT is a nice workmanlike bit of kit, but may be a little pricey.

Regards, Dan.
dmills
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1533 Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:00 am Location: High Wycombe, UK
Audiophiles use phono leads because they are unbalanced people!

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by jbap »

Watch out for the links above, some of them contain maleware and viruses
jbap
New here
Posts: 6 Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 1:42 am

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by jbap »

Shame on you sos moderator
jbap
New here
Posts: 6 Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 1:42 am

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by zenguitar »

You have revived a twelve year old topic with two one line posts. One of which was an unqualified attack on SOS forum moderation from a decade before you created your account here.

It would have been very easy to disapprove both posts and ban you from the SOS forums. But, as you can see, we prefer to remain accountable,

So, would you be kind enough to firstly qualify which specific 12 year old posts contain links to malware and viruses because even after all that time we would want to remove them.

And secondly, what exactly do you have in mind with this post?

jbap wrote:Shame on you SOS moderator

Bearing in mind that no SOS moderator has posted in this topic; you have asserted that links to malware and viruses have been posted but have utterly failed to point out which those links are and which posts contain them; and that you are responsible for promoting the alleged dangerous links by reviving this historical topic.

Put up, or shut up.

Andy :beamup:
User avatar
zenguitar
Moderator
Posts: 13295 Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 12:00 am Location: Devon
There is a profound African saying, "A white man who cannot dance is a victimless crime, whereas a white man with a djembe drum ..."

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by jbap »

Discourteous reply deleted --ED.
Last edited by Eddy Deegan on Sat Feb 27, 2021 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
jbap
New here
Posts: 6 Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 1:42 am

Re: Parametric EQ without valves?

Post by Murray B »

It's a shame if the sites linked to contain malware. But as a recent study reported that around 30,000 websites are hacked every day I personally wouldn't expect the Forum administrators to ensure all historic links are safe as this would just be unreasonable.

Throwing abuse at the moderators is uncalled for in any circumstance and is disappointing to see.
User avatar
Murray B
Regular
Posts: 467 Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:00 am Location: Staffordshire
Locked