'Set and forget' reverb padal

Discuss hardware/software tools and techniques involved in capturing sound, in the studio, live or on location.

'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by baward »

Hi,

I recently sold a spring reverb, which did only one thing, but did it really well. I am looking to replace it with a similar, modern digital reverb (stereo) pedal. I looked into some Strymon pedals, such as the Night Sky, but they exceed my requirements by about 1000 miles, as I don't need all the parameters. It doesn't need to slavishly only recreate spring reverb. I can spend up to about £300 or so. What do people recommend?
baward
Regular
Posts: 431 Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 12:00 am
 

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Dave.P »

My go to is the Boss RV-6 - but everyone has different thoughts of course.
The RV6 does spring, plate and hall plus some lovely ambient stuff too.

Should be about £125 new if you look around.

Built like a tank too of course.

Demo here -
https://youtu.be/kWG6e3WGIBM
User avatar
Dave.P
Regular
Posts: 420 Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:53 pm Location: Scotland

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by The Elf »

Zoom MS-50G or MS-70CDR, depending on requirement - and hack it to pick up the effects you'd like from the other pedals in the range.

The reverbs are actually pretty good, and one of them is 'Strymon-inspired'...
Last edited by The Elf on Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
The Elf
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 21434 Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Wonks »

Mooer R7 is worth a look as well at about £99. I have a Boss RV-5, (which is the same as the RV-6 less one ambient reverb mode IIRC), but the R7 gives you 7 modes, lots of tweaking (pre-delay, HF, LF, decay and level) and is programmable per mode. Modes are room, hall, church, cave, plate, spring and mod. It sounds good to me, probably better than the Boss, though you could say just a bit different. Mooer also do the A7, which is their ambient reverb version. Never heard that though.

But if you just want a simple spring reverb pedal, the Tone City Tiny Spring (£50 at Andertons) sounds decent to me. But reverbs are very personal as to what you like. I prefer reverbs to not have too many definite echoes, but others like a very ‘drippy’ reverb.

If it’s not for guitar use, then a used rack reverb unit could give you everything you want for not much money.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19208 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Freethorpe, Norfolk, UK
Reliably fallible.

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Ben Asaro »

TC Electronic Hall of Fame mini may fit the bill for you. Super easy to load algorithms, single knob for whatever parameter you consider most important.

Excellent sounding reverbs, too.
Last edited by Ben Asaro on Sun Apr 11, 2021 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ben Asaro
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3485 Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:00 am Location: NYC

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Wonks »

You do realise you are just going to get a list of almost every reverb pedal available, don't you? :D
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19208 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Freethorpe, Norfolk, UK
Reliably fallible.

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Ben Asaro »

Wonks wrote:You do realise you are just going to get a list of almost every reverb pedal available, don't you? :D

LOL, truth.
Ben Asaro
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3485 Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:00 am Location: NYC

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by BillB »

Basic question - mono or stereo output? I was just checking out Wonk's Mooer R7 suggestion and noticed the single output. Complete turn-off for me, but might well suit a single-amp gigging musician!
BillB
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2468 Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 12:00 am Location: East Yorkshire

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by baward »

BillB wrote:Basic question - mono or stereo output? I was just checking out Wonk's Mooer R7 suggestion and noticed the single output. Complete turn-off for me, but might well suit a single-amp gigging musician!

Stereo outs, so that will exclude the Mooer (sorry Mooer ;-)

I'll check out the other boxes, thanks all.
baward
Regular
Posts: 431 Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 12:00 am
 

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Wonks »

I was just going to ask about the stereo question. But stereo input as well? My Boss RV-5 unit has that and is fed from a stereo chorus.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19208 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Freethorpe, Norfolk, UK
Reliably fallible.

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Sam Spoons »

Stereo also excludes the TC Hall of Fame mini but the Hof 2 full sized pedal is stereo, as is the HoF 2 x4, Trinity Reverb and Arena Reverb from TC. The original HoF is still on the TC webpage but may be discontinued, if you can find one at the right price that would probably get the job done but the Hof 2 is under £100. My main guitar combo has no reverb so I have a HoF mini on my guitar pedalboard, I found a reverb I liked, loaded it to the pedal (the mini can only have one reverb loaded at a time) and it is always on.
Last edited by Sam Spoons on Sun Apr 11, 2021 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sam Spoons
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 22907 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
Still mourning the loss of my 'Jedi Poster" status :)

People often mistake me for a grown-up because of my age.

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by CS70 »

I think you can take any reverb pedal, set it and then forget about it? So long it keeps working that is :lol:
User avatar
CS70
Longtime Poster
Posts: 7799 Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 12:00 am Location: Oslo, Norway
Silver Spoon - Check out our latest video and the FB page

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by MOF »

If ‘or so’ means an extra £55 then the new UAD fx pedals could fit the bill.
https://www.uaudio.com/uafx/effects-pedals.html
Last edited by MOF on Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MOF
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2578 Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 12:00 am Location: United Kingdom

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Arpangel »

Put simply, if you’re after a spring sound, you won’t get it with a recreation, it’s the most difficult thing to do, and they haven’t done it yet, there are so many mechanical factors involved.
Get something secondhand, vintage, it’ll cost you a bit more, but it’ll be worth it, there really aren’t any compromises, and recreations always sound pathetic, sorry, but that’s the reality of it.
If it worked so well, why did you sell it?
Last edited by Arpangel on Mon Apr 12, 2021 7:05 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Arpangel
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 21934 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am
"I will not say: do not weep; for not all tears are an evil" Gandalf - J.R.R. Tolkien.

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by forumuser931182 »

Strymon Blue Sky is simple yet gives you a number of reverb options.
Free the Tone also has a nice stereo reverb pedal.
forumuser931182
Regular
Posts: 204 Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:23 am Location: Australia

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Arpangel »

forumuser931182 wrote:Strymon Blue Sky is simple yet gives you a number of reverb options.
Free the Tone also has a nice stereo reverb pedal.

Spring reverbs aside, I’ve had both, Blue Sky, and Big Sky, sold the Blue Sky, still have the Big one.
The Big Sky is set and forget, you may think it's OTT but honestly, it’s so good, even the basic patches, you won’t want to edit it much, most of the time I just select one of the presets and it sounds fantastic, it’s simply one of the best reverbs out there, rack or pedal.
The only thingy that comes close, but sounds a bit different, is the Specular Tempus, the Eventide Black Hole is a bit of a vulgar show-off in comparison to these two, good, but way over-used, and a bit of a cliche, I had one, for about two weeks, the Big Sky does all that, and much much more, it could be my only reverb.
Last edited by Arpangel on Mon Apr 12, 2021 1:22 pm, edited 5 times in total.
User avatar
Arpangel
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 21934 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am
"I will not say: do not weep; for not all tears are an evil" Gandalf - J.R.R. Tolkien.

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Ben Asaro »

Arpangel wrote: the Eventide Black Hole is a bit of a vulgar show-off in comparison to these two, good, but way over-used, and a bit of a cliche, I had one, for about two weeks, the Big Sky does all that, and much much more, it could be my only reverb.

You forgot the 'in my opinion' part. :D

I have the Blackhole, it's a great pedal, very versatile and sounds amazing. I think it's biggest failing is that it clips rather easily when you're feeding a hot signal into it.
Last edited by Ben Asaro on Mon Apr 12, 2021 1:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ben Asaro
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3485 Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:00 am Location: NYC

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Arpangel »

Ben Asaro wrote:
Arpangel wrote: the Eventide Black Hole is a bit of a vulgar show-off in comparison to these two, good, but way over-used, and a bit of a cliche, I had one, for about two weeks, the Big Sky does all that, and much much more, it could be my only reverb.

You forgot the 'in my opinion' part. :D

I have the Blackhole, it's a great pedal, very versatile and sounds amazing. I think it's biggest failing is that it clips rather easily when you're feeding a hot signal into it.

"In My Oppinion" :D:D:D .......Ben, I was blown away by the Black Hole when I got it, it really does give you all you need if you’re after that Eventide sound, you probably know, it’s supposed to be the same algorithms as used in the H8000.
I had an H3000 and I was expecting something similar, and the BH isn’t, I sold my H3000, and bought another one! when they were actually affordable, I sold that one too, they have this really bad transformer hum, all of them, I just couldn’t put up with it, but they sound the best, out of all the Eventides.
User avatar
Arpangel
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 21934 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am
"I will not say: do not weep; for not all tears are an evil" Gandalf - J.R.R. Tolkien.

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by baward »

MOF wrote:If ‘or so’ means an extra £55 then the new UAD fx pedals could fit the bill.
https://www.uaudio.com/uafx/effects-pedals.html

That Golden Reverberator sounds lush! Vangelis would have loved it, although of course he had an actual Lexicon 224...
baward
Regular
Posts: 431 Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 12:00 am
 

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by baward »

Arpangel wrote:Put simply, if you’re after a spring sound, you won’t get it with a recreation, it’s the most difficult thing to do, and they haven’t done it yet, there are so many mechanical factors involved.
Get something secondhand, vintage, it’ll cost you a bit more, but it’ll be worth it, there really aren’t any compromises, and recreations always sound pathetic, sorry, but that’s the reality of it.
If it worked so well, why did you sell it?

Enormous and unwieldy (it was a Great British Spring, and did indeed sound fab :-) and I fancy a change.
baward
Regular
Posts: 431 Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 12:00 am
 

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Macca_25387 »

Trex room mate may be worth a shout. It’s lived on my board with the knobs in the same position for about two years now. That’s about as good as set and forget gets. Setting number 4 with a touch of chorus is my favourite. Can be had for under £150 second hand.
Macca_25387
Poster
Posts: 19 Joined: Sat May 23, 2020 10:18 pm

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Arpangel »

baward wrote:
MOF wrote:If ‘or so’ means an extra £55 then the new UAD fx pedals could fit the bill.
https://www.uaudio.com/uafx/effects-pedals.html

That Golden Reverberator sounds lush! Vangelis would have loved it, although of course he had an actual Lexicon 224...

I had a 224 up to three years ago, hardware? software? When you’ve had something like this you can’t help but giggle inside when people talk about how good plugins are :D
It was so unreliable, but it was nearly 40 years old! The sound was fantastic, but because of reliability I sold it, and the guy repaired it.
I didn’t ever think about replacing it, you just can’t, it was a lovely time having it as "my guest" for awhile, it had a spirit, it was so powerful, you could feel it, a vibe, attached to its physical being, I can't say that about many things, and I’m sure that’s why Vangelis was attracted to it.
Last edited by Arpangel on Wed Apr 14, 2021 7:18 am, edited 6 times in total.
User avatar
Arpangel
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 21934 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am
"I will not say: do not weep; for not all tears are an evil" Gandalf - J.R.R. Tolkien.

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by CS70 »

can’t help but giggle inside when people talk about how good plugins are

My impression (not from a Lexi 224) is that a lot of the difference we perceive is because of the ease, immediacy of use and the way we can explore the options and zoom in the one we want.

For example, I much rather use real guitar amps than emulations, and physical-box emulations much rather than software emulations.

But I'm well aware that good guitar emulations are indistinguishable from a sonic point of view. There is no electric guitarist in the world that can consistently tell a Kemper or an Axe or an Helix from the real things in a true blind test, with no prior information.

Sure if one knows a specific AC30 intimately, he/she may be able to recognize it, but take two random AC30s that you don't know, one real then other emulated, have someone else set them up similarly and play without knowing what's attached to guitar.. no way you can tell what's what. You could with a POD, but not anymore.

And yet I still like "real" amps better (to the point that I have a small warehouse full of them :D).

Why? I get better sounds. A paradox! Because from the above, the exact same sounds could be found within the emulation.

I don't usually think that much about it (I'd rather play) but if I do, the difference must lie elsewhere than the sound.. and indeed it does. A real amp is often a thing of beauty - I love the lights and the colors and the shiny metal and the feel of the knobs. It puts me in a good mood. Turning physical knobs allow me to explore a huge range of sounds very quickly, without looking. Controls in amp are often interrelated - changing one changes what the others do as well - and I can make complex, multi-parameter changes in less time that it takes to say "Fractal Audio Systems". No wonder I find better sounds on real amps!
Last edited by CS70 on Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
CS70
Longtime Poster
Posts: 7799 Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 12:00 am Location: Oslo, Norway
Silver Spoon - Check out our latest video and the FB page

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Arpangel »

CS70 wrote:
can’t help but giggle inside when people talk about how good plugins are

My impression (not from a Lexi 224) is that a lot of the difference we perceive is because of the ease, immediacy of use and the way we can explore the options and zoom in the one we want.

For example, I much rather use real guitar amps than emulations, and physical-box emulations much rather than software emulations.

But I'm well aware that good guitar emulations are indistinguishable from a sonic point of view. There is no electric guitarist in the world that can consistently tell a Kemper or an Axe or an Helix from the real things in a true blind test, with no prior information.

Sure if one knows a specific AC30 intimately, he/she may be able to recognize it, but take two random AC30s that you don't know, one real then other emulated, have someone else set them up similarly and play without knowing what's attached to guitar.. no way you can tell what's what. You could with a POD, but not anymore.

And yet I still like "real" amps better (to the point that I have a small warehouse full of them :D).

Why? I get better sounds. A paradox! Because from the above, the exact same sounds could be found within the emulation.

I don't usually think that much about it (I'd rather play) but if I do, the difference must lie elsewhere than the sound.. and indeed it does. A real amp is often a thing of beauty - I love the lights and the colors and the shiny metal and the feel of the knobs. It puts me in a good mood. Turning physical knobs allow me to explore a huge range of sounds very quickly, without looking. Controls in amp are often interrelated - changing one changes what the others do as well - and I can make complex, multi-parameter changes in less time that it takes to say "Fractal Audio Systems". No wonder I find better sounds on real amps!

Seventeen years ago I was the one arguing about how great computers and plugins are, I was a complete convert, and it was great, didn’t think about anything else for years, I bought into it from day one, an early adopter, it worked for me, for two reasons, I had very little money, and two, I had no choice, it was all I could afford, and I got a lot for my money, compared with hardware.
But then I did have a choice, and I found out, and got back, the feelings I forgot about, like using and interacting with hardware, and in that time, it’s gradually taken over from the computer, simply because I do have a choice now, and I prefer it, that’s just me.
User avatar
Arpangel
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 21934 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am
"I will not say: do not weep; for not all tears are an evil" Gandalf - J.R.R. Tolkien.

Re: 'Set and forget' reverb padal

Post by Albatross »

I have an enormous and unwieldy 88-key keyboard flight case in the shed not doing anything and as soon as I bump into a suitable bit of metal I'm going to make a plate reverb out of it.
User avatar
Albatross
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3143 Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2015 12:00 am Location: Airstrip 1, Eurasia
Post Reply