
I was going to offer to look after it for you but I really don't have space!

blinddrew wrote:That's the post I was hoping to see.
I was going to offer to look after it for you but I really don't have space!
Arpangel wrote: I quote "there are 4 tiny metal pins, to that part of the key action, I replaced all of them on every key"
He is a very special guy, one of a dying breed.
BigRedX wrote:Analogue recordings were often sped up or slowed down to achieve the desired tempo at the mix down/mastering stage, with the equivalent change in pitch of the music.
Also in the days before the advent of the ubiquitous electronic tuner the tuning reference used in the studio could be whatever was convenient. Often the other instruments would be tuned to whichever instrument was most difficult to change the tuning of and there was no guarantee that it would be A=440.
My first band had two reed organs both of which were tuned differently and neither to A=440. We tuned to the one we used most often, but would retune to the other when we needed to use it because of the chords available or the sound.
Arpangel wrote:BigRedX wrote:Analogue recordings were often sped up or slowed down to achieve the desired tempo at the mix down/mastering stage, with the equivalent change in pitch of the music.
Also in the days before the advent of the ubiquitous electronic tuner the tuning reference used in the studio could be whatever was convenient. Often the other instruments would be tuned to whichever instrument was most difficult to change the tuning of and there was no guarantee that it would be A=440.
My first band had two reed organs both of which were tuned differently and neither to A=440. We tuned to the one we used most often, but would retune to the other when we needed to use it because of the chords available or the sound.
Yes alarm over, I’ve got a lot of old classical recordings on vinyl, it’s interesting checking the keys of some of those.
Folderol wrote:Arpangel wrote:BigRedX wrote:Analogue recordings were often sped up or slowed down to achieve the desired tempo at the mix down/mastering stage, with the equivalent change in pitch of the music.
Also in the days before the advent of the ubiquitous electronic tuner the tuning reference used in the studio could be whatever was convenient. Often the other instruments would be tuned to whichever instrument was most difficult to change the tuning of and there was no guarantee that it would be A=440.
My first band had two reed organs both of which were tuned differently and neither to A=440. We tuned to the one we used most often, but would retune to the other when we needed to use it because of the chords available or the sound.
Yes alarm over, I’ve got a lot of old classical recordings on vinyl, it’s interesting checking the keys of some of those.
It's quite useful to have a record deck with speed control
Arpangel wrote:Folderol wrote: It's quite useful to have a record deck with speed control
Thanks, you’ve just given me a great reason to buy a Technics.
James Perrett wrote:Arpangel wrote:Folderol wrote: It's quite useful to have a record deck with speed control
Thanks, you’ve just given me a great reason to buy a Technics.
Or a Garrard 301/401 (though they don't have as wide a speed range as the Technics). Of course, if you want the ultimate ins speed range then a Lenco would give you any speed between 30 and 86rpm.
Arpangel wrote:James Perrett wrote:Arpangel wrote:Folderol wrote: It's quite useful to have a record deck with speed control
Thanks, you’ve just given me a great reason to buy a Technics.
Or a Garrard 301/401 (though they don't have as wide a speed range as the Technics). Of course, if you want the ultimate ins speed range then a Lenco would give you any speed between 30 and 86rpm.
Don’t worry James, I’m not into playing along with records in a big way, I only have to "play along" with things when my partner has had a couple of glasses of wine, gets on YouTube and says "go on, play along with that" I then reluctantly have to make my way across the room to the piano, a feat in itself, to do my Russ Conway impression, smile and all, and attempt to play along very badly with the Rach 11 concerto, Chick Corea or some other stupidly difficult person, liked I’d fail every audition.
RichardT wrote: How different from the home life of our own dear Queen! That’s very funny, Tony!
Arpangel wrote:James Perrett wrote:Arpangel wrote:Folderol wrote: It's quite useful to have a record deck with speed control
Thanks, you’ve just given me a great reason to buy a Technics.
Or a Garrard 301/401 (though they don't have as wide a speed range as the Technics). Of course, if you want the ultimate ins speed range then a Lenco would give you any speed between 30 and 86rpm.
Don’t worry James, I’m not into playing along with records in a big way, I only have to "play along" with things when my partner has had a couple of glasses of wine, gets on YouTube and says "go on, play along with that" I then reluctantly have to make my way across the room to the piano, a feat in itself, to do my Russ Conway impression, smile and all, and attempt to play along very badly with the Rach 11 concerto, Chick Corea or some other stupidly difficult person, liked I’d fail every audition.
MarkOne wrote: That sounds like a YouTube channel I need to subscribe to !
The Red Bladder wrote:A new baby grand from Bluthner costs about $100,000. So look after the damn thing!
The market for grand pianos has gone nuts lately - all the top concert grands today cost over $200,000 - and Bösendorfer and Fazioli both report waiting lists at that level!
Arpangel wrote:she played the Cello like Hendrix played the guitar.