Hugh Robjohns wrote:One day I'll get the mojo back to start playing seriously again!
Same here, but I'd settle for playing humorously again.
Andy
Hugh Robjohns wrote:I like the Yamaha FC7. The pedal angle range can be configured for sitting or standing positions, and there is an adjustable spring-return 0-10 degree 'overpress' action if required for emphasis 'stabs' which can be handy. It has a 50k pot and the wiring obviously suits Yamaha keyboards, but I've not had any problems with any of the things I've plugged it into so far.
Folderol wrote:Just to clarify, the one I was referring to had the LDR in the signal path. There weren't any voltage controlled amplifiers in those days. The organ was populated entirely with discrete transistors - mostly germanium ones.
Hugh Robjohns wrote:Yes... but twice-the-price classier?
Like you, I mildly prefer the EXP-50, but I'm not upset when using the FC7...
Hugh Robjohns wrote: ...yet costs twice as much!
BWC wrote:From the prices I'm seeing, more than four times as much for the EXP-50 than for the FC7.
I also see there's an EXP-100, which looks the same as the 50 with an added kick switch.
One of the customer reviewers on the 100 suggested that it's an optical pedal
..but then they also said that they think that's the cause of extra latency, so...
I'm still thinking I'll order both the FC7 and the EP-3, and keep the EXP-50 as a future possibility.
Hugh Robjohns wrote:One of the customer reviewers on the 100 suggested that it's an optical pedal
It is...but then they also said that they think that's the cause of extra latency, so...
Quite. The Internet is a constant source of amazement and amusement...
So about the same length of time it takes to move the pedal!