Digital mixer, again.

Discuss the hardware/software tools and techniques involved in capturing sound, in the studio or on location.

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Arpangel »

I’ve been looking at "scenes" saving and recalling them.
I’m wondering if this is going to be as useful as I thought it would be, in reality, it’s a bit different.
I never work on more than one mix at a time, and when that’s finished, the decks get cleared and I move on to the next one, so there’s no need to actually save mixes.
The only way this could be useful for me, is in setting up instrument and microphone "templates" for recording, with favourite effects chains as part of the scenes, for different instruments, that would reduce set-up time.
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19412 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Mike Stranks »

Don't get hung-up on 'scenes'... they're but one of the many benefits available to users of digital mixers.

For myself, I had one 'scene' which was basically my starting-point settings for any mix. The only reason I had that, too, was just to be sure that I hadn't overlooked resetting some tweak that I'd used that wouldn't be required at the starting-point for the next mix. But others here will doubtless be finding 'scenes' invaluable in their live work...

Just 'cos something's there it doesn't mean it has to be used... I've never used the 'auto-park' feature on my car... :)
Mike Stranks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 10585 Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

Arpangel wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 6:09 amThe only way this could be useful for me, is in setting up instrument and microphone "templates" for recording, with favourite effects chains as part of the scenes, for different instruments, that would reduce set-up time.

Exactly that. What a handy feature, and something no analogue desk provides!
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 41720 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Arpangel »

Hugh Robjohns wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 8:08 am
Arpangel wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 6:09 amThe only way this could be useful for me, is in setting up instrument and microphone "templates" for recording, with favourite effects chains as part of the scenes, for different instruments, that would reduce set-up time.

Exactly that. What a handy feature, and something no analogue desk provides!

It's the first thing I’ll set up when I get home, what I’m wondering now, I’m going through the manual :( is it possible to have effects "per channel" what I mean by that is does every channel have its own dedicated effects section, or is it one central effects unit that serves all channels? the latter would be a severe limitation.

PS

Looks like it’s got eight effects units, that’s not bad.
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19412 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Aled Hughes »

Arpangel wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 8:37 am
Hugh Robjohns wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 8:08 am
Arpangel wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 6:09 amThe only way this could be useful for me, is in setting up instrument and microphone "templates" for recording, with favourite effects chains as part of the scenes, for different instruments, that would reduce set-up time.

Exactly that. What a handy feature, and something no analogue desk provides!

It's the first thing I’ll set up when I get home, what I’m wondering now, I’m going through the manual :( is it possible to have effects "per channel" what I mean by that is does every channel have its own dedicated effects section, or is it one central effects unit that serves all channels? the latter would be a severe limitation.

PS

Looks like it’s got eight effects units, that’s not bad.

I think the effects can be configures as either per-channel inserts, or as a global send effect.
Aled Hughes
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1980 Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:00 am Location: Pwllheli, Cymru

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Arpangel »

Aled Hughes wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 8:46 am
Arpangel wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 8:37 am
Hugh Robjohns wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 8:08 am
Arpangel wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 6:09 amThe only way this could be useful for me, is in setting up instrument and microphone "templates" for recording, with favourite effects chains as part of the scenes, for different instruments, that would reduce set-up time.

Exactly that. What a handy feature, and something no analogue desk provides!

It's the first thing I’ll set up when I get home, what I’m wondering now, I’m going through the manual :( is it possible to have effects "per channel" what I mean by that is does every channel have its own dedicated effects section, or is it one central effects unit that serves all channels? the latter would be a severe limitation.

PS

Looks like it’s got eight effects units, that’s not bad.

I think the effects can be configures as either per-channel inserts, or as a global send effect.

That’s correct, some can be used only as inserts, some sends.
Look! I’m making progress! and embracing new technology, aren’t I good!

:D:D:D
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19412 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Bob Bickerton »

:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:

Thinking about scenes - sure if you're running Les Mis' you can assign 80 or 90 different scenes......

But in your case I would set up a few scenes as templates - easy recall for your favourite set-ups!

(not familiar with your desk so labels might be different - sometimes templates are different and called shows)

Bob
User avatar
Bob Bickerton
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5356 Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 12:00 am Location: Nelson, New Zealand

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Arpangel »

Bob Bickerton wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:40 am:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:

Thinking about scenes - sure if you're running Les Mis' you can assign 80 or 90 different scenes......

But in your case I would set up a few scenes as templates - easy recall for your favourite set-ups!

(not familiar with your desk so labels might be different - sometimes templates are different and called shows)

Bob

They are scenes Bob, the thing is, I rather like those scribble strips, they’re handy, but if I haven’t got room for this desk, I don’t think the Compact and Producer have them?

:(
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19412 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Aled Hughes »

Arpangel wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:45 am
Bob Bickerton wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:40 am:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:

Thinking about scenes - sure if you're running Les Mis' you can assign 80 or 90 different scenes......

But in your case I would set up a few scenes as templates - easy recall for your favourite set-ups!

(not familiar with your desk so labels might be different - sometimes templates are different and called shows)

Bob

They are scenes Bob, the thing is, I rather like those scribble strips, they’re handy, but if I haven’t got room for this desk, I don’t think the Compact and Producer have them?

:(

The Compact has them, but not the Producer.

If you want smaller, maybe look at the Midas M32R as well. It’s essentially an upmarket X32 Compact, and works pretty much the same way.
Aled Hughes
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1980 Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:00 am Location: Pwllheli, Cymru

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Arpangel »

Aled Hughes wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:47 am
Arpangel wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:45 am
Bob Bickerton wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:40 am:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:

Thinking about scenes - sure if you're running Les Mis' you can assign 80 or 90 different scenes......

But in your case I would set up a few scenes as templates - easy recall for your favourite set-ups!

(not familiar with your desk so labels might be different - sometimes templates are different and called shows)

Bob

They are scenes Bob, the thing is, I rather like those scribble strips, they’re handy, but if I haven’t got room for this desk, I don’t think the Compact and Producer have them?

:(

The Compact has them, but not the Producer.

If you want smaller, maybe look at the Midas M32R as well. It’s essentially an upmarket X32 Compact, and works pretty much the same way.

I think size is going to be the only deciding factor in this, I’m already warming to this X32, the Compact, and Producer just don’t have enough inputs, Midas neither.
I don’t really want to have to faff around with input boxes, it’s a shame, as the Compact, and Midas 32r are the perfect size for me, if they had 32 inputs I’d buy one today.
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19412 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Aled Hughes »

Arpangel wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:57 am
Aled Hughes wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:47 am
Arpangel wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:45 am
Bob Bickerton wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:40 am:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:

Thinking about scenes - sure if you're running Les Mis' you can assign 80 or 90 different scenes......

But in your case I would set up a few scenes as templates - easy recall for your favourite set-ups!

(not familiar with your desk so labels might be different - sometimes templates are different and called shows)

Bob

They are scenes Bob, the thing is, I rather like those scribble strips, they’re handy, but if I haven’t got room for this desk, I don’t think the Compact and Producer have them?

:(

The Compact has them, but not the Producer.

If you want smaller, maybe look at the Midas M32R as well. It’s essentially an upmarket X32 Compact, and works pretty much the same way.

I think size is going to be the only deciding factor in this, I’m already warming to this X32, the Compact, and Producer just don’t have enough inputs, Midas neither.
I don’t really want to have to faff around with input boxes, it’s a shame, as the Compact, and Midas 32r are the perfect size for me, if they had 32 inputs I’d buy one today.


The input boxes aren’t a faff really, especially if you’re going to keep them set up in the same place. It’s a single Cat5 cable to the desk, configure the desk once to see those inputs and off you go. Saves space, you can place the mixer where you want it, and have the stagebox out of the way to reduce cable clutter.
Aled Hughes
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1980 Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:00 am Location: Pwllheli, Cymru

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by S2 »

I have the Producer which I use for one of the bands I'm in. Slight overkill really, but I really like the scenes feature. We play in the same places a lot so it's nice to save the room setup for each venue and then recall it with the odd tweak the next time we play.

I use an A & H Zed 12fx for a smaller band and there is always a little thought involved when going from one to the other, especially if I haven't used one of them for a while.

But it's a great desk - even without the scribble strips and only 16 inputs. Far more portable for the live use we do than the Compact or the full size.
User avatar
S2
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3918 Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:00 am Location: Surrey

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Arpangel »

Aled Hughes wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:14 am The input boxes aren’t a faff really, especially if you’re going to keep them set up in the same place. It’s a single Cat5 cable to the desk, configure the desk once to see those inputs and off you go. Saves space, you can place the mixer where you want it, and have the stagebox out of the way to reduce cable clutter.

Hmmm? what would I be looking at? to give an extra 16 inputs? I’m not familiar with Cat5 shenanigans, and would they appear as an extra layer on the X32?
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19412 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Aled Hughes »

Arpangel wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:45 am
Aled Hughes wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:14 am The input boxes aren’t a faff really, especially if you’re going to keep them set up in the same place. It’s a single Cat5 cable to the desk, configure the desk once to see those inputs and off you go. Saves space, you can place the mixer where you want it, and have the stagebox out of the way to reduce cable clutter.

Hmmm? what would I be looking at? to give an extra 16 inputs? I’m not familiar with Cat5 shenanigans, and would they appear as an extra layer on the X32?

https://www.bax-shop.co.uk/digital-snak ... gL-1_D_BwE

Gives 16 ins an 8 outs to a Behringer X32 or Midas M32 range. There is also a Midas equvalent that works with both ranges too.

They essentially take the place of the additional connections on the bigger X32- you can assign them ti be on channels 17-32 or however you like (obviously, having less faders, they are on a separate layer on the mixer itself)

It’s important to note that the desks are all the same internally, and can ‘see’ the same amount of inputs and outputs. It’s only the amount of onboard connections and faders that changes. They all have the same capabilities under the hood.
Aled Hughes
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1980 Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:00 am Location: Pwllheli, Cymru

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by ef37a »

Don't want to upset you Mr A but did you consider one of these ?...

https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/soundcraft-ui24r

Mike C seemed to think it was the dog's whatsits.

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 17905 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Aled Hughes »

ef37a wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 11:07 am Don't want to upset you Mr A but did you consider one of these ?...

https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/soundcraft-ui24r

Mike C seemed to think it was the dog's whatsits.

Dave.

I have one. If it ticks your boxes it’s a great piece of kit. Not as many inputs as the X32 though, and it is (stupidly) fixed at 48kHz operation as an interface. Also, it’s more limited in terms of FX engines as they can’t be placed at inserts (you could work around it with routing, but it would be fiddly…)
Aled Hughes
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1980 Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:00 am Location: Pwllheli, Cymru

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by DGL. »

Arpangel wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:45 am
Aled Hughes wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:14 am The input boxes aren’t a faff really, especially if you’re going to keep them set up in the same place. It’s a single Cat5 cable to the desk, configure the desk once to see those inputs and off you go. Saves space, you can place the mixer where you want it, and have the stagebox out of the way to reduce cable clutter.

Hmmm? what would I be looking at? to give an extra 16 inputs? I’m not familiar with Cat5 shenanigans, and would they appear as an extra layer on the X32?

It gives you more sources to choose from, not any extra channels on a FS X32. Basically any channel can take it's input for a few different sources, these can be the onboard inputs, the card inputs or from the AES50 network.
In the routing section you choose where each channel gets it's input from and with the V4 firmware that can be from anywhere for any channel.
So I could have CH1 coming fromany of the onboard inputs, CH2 coming from an input on either AES50 A or B, and CH3 coming from the card (i.e. an input from the USB interface).

AES50 Supermac works in the same way as a regular snake except the transmission is digital, the pre-amps are in the stagebox, and the cable required is just shielded cat 5e (must be shielded with ethercons at ether end that are connected to the shield), in the world of AES50/Supermac this gives you 48 channels each way at 48Khz.

Naturally if you have one of the smaller X32's then a stagebox is needed to access all mixable channels (well you could use inputs from the card slot).
DGL.
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2157 Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:00 am Location: Portland, Dorset

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Dave Rowles »

I went for the Midas DL32 when getting more inputs for my X32 Rack. Purely because of the upgraded Pres, which do make a difference, and the flexibility. Works brilliantly as a stage box. Once I'd set the X32 to see it, it automatically uses the DL32 as the inputs first as long as the DL32 is on.
User avatar
Dave Rowles
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1537 Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:00 am Location: Isle of Man
http://www.manninmusic.com Teacher - Isle of Man
http://www.manninmusic.shop Music Shop - Isle of Man
https://www.facebook.com/mannin.sound - PA Hire/Sound Engineer - Isle of Man

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Sam Spoons »

I use scenes for different recording and/or mixing scenarios, I have different ones for live mixing, studio band or acoustic recording etc.

You have sussed out the fx capabilities I think but yes, 8 stereo fx slots which can br use as inserts or send fx (with some limitations).

I love the LCD scribble strips, best thing since sliced garlic baguettes, they were the main reason I ought my X32 Compact rather than an A&H Qu16.

The S16 should work flawlessly and give you the extra physical inputs the Compact lacks compared to the full sized X32.
User avatar
Sam Spoons
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 21528 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
People often mistake me for a grown-up because of my age.

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Arpangel »

It’s here, in the basement, no time to even look at it yet.
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19412 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Arpangel »

Sam Spoons wrote: Thu Jun 16, 2022 11:46 am I use scenes for different recording and/or mixing scenarios, I have different ones for live mixing, studio band or acoustic recording etc.

You have sussed out the fx capabilities I think but yes, 8 stereo fx slots which can br use as inserts or send fx (with some limitations).

I love the LCD scribble strips, best thing since sliced garlic baguettes, they were the main reason I ought my X32 Compact rather than an A&H Qu16.

The S16 should work flawlessly and give you the extra physical inputs the Compact lacks compared to the full sized X32.

It’s too big, it’s going to displace too much stuff, I could accommodate it, but it would upset my "cockpit" approach to playing, and become the centre of operations, my synths need to be in that place.
A Compact with an S16 would be OK, does the S16 show up in the X32 as another layer?
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19412 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Luke W »

Arpangel wrote: Thu Jun 23, 2022 7:47 am A Compact with an S16 would be OK, does the S16 show up in the X32 as another layer?

You assign it via the "Routing" menu, so you can pick which block of channels you'd like to see the inputs from the S16 on.
User avatar
Luke W
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1647 Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:00 am Location: Northamptonshire, UK

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Dave Rowles »

You can assign input sources as a block of 8. So in your case it'd probably be inputs 1-8 and 9-16 desk pres, then inputs 17-24 and 25-32 S16 pres.

You can then assign any of the inputs to any channel. This is a little bit inflexible which is one of the major gripes against the desk, but I find, in reality, that I've rarely come across a situation where it would've been useful to have more flexibility.
User avatar
Dave Rowles
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1537 Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:00 am Location: Isle of Man
http://www.manninmusic.com Teacher - Isle of Man
http://www.manninmusic.shop Music Shop - Isle of Man
https://www.facebook.com/mannin.sound - PA Hire/Sound Engineer - Isle of Man

Re: Digital mixer, again.

Post by Arpangel »

OK so it doesn’t give me extra hardware inputs just more choice of inputs from the ones already on board?
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19412 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am
Post Reply