Better to change mic or amp?

Discuss hardware/software tools and techniques involved in capturing sound, in the studio, live or on location.
Post Reply

Better to change mic or amp?

Post by Alchemy Studio »

hi!
i have a hobbyst home studio and i sometimes record different kind of acoustic instruments. All by and for myself, no "external" users...

My main mic is a neumann tlm 102 enetering in a focusrite ISA ONE preamp, digitally connectd to the soundcard

But I also have a couple of samson c02 microphones (cardioid), enetering in a SM PRO AUDIO TB202 2 channel preamp (analog). I use these mic often to get a more "wide" take of instruments such as guitars or similar. I always couple the stereo take with the mono one obtained with the neumann mic.
I usually put my pair of samson c02 above the instrument, in a XY configuration.
my room is acoustically treated and the sound is quite "dry", without too much room reverb.

While the neumann+isa one have an excellent quality, sometimes i think about changing the stereo mics+pre to get a better sound. I bought them at the begining of my "career" when budget constrains were a thing!

My search ended up with:

Rode NT5 MP microphones
ART Digital MPA II (i will connect it digitally to my soundcard, a plus)

but this would mean to spend about 1000€...

I wonder if the quality will be SO MUCH better than what I have (I suppose so...) but I also wonder if I should change first the amp or first the mics, trying to understand which is the weakest point of my chain... and to spread the money over a longer timespan.

any help would be appreciated! :)

thanks!
Alchemy Studio
Poster
Posts: 34 Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:00 am
Listen to my music at
www.alchemystudio.it

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by Mike Stranks »

My thoughts...

About 20 years ago, I had a pair of CO2s. I found them to be acceptable budget mics, but incredibly bright. Consequently, they didn't get much use...

If you like the NT5s (excellent mics for the money) but budget is a consideration, have a look at the Rode M5 set. I have some. A definite step-up from the CO2s in my opinion, and not far behind the NT5s in many respects. In fact, in his review, Paul White preferred them to the NT5 on some sources.

Read the review here:

https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/rode-m5

But my esteemed forum colleagues will also be along with their own recommendations... you may have opened a can of worms! :lol:

... and if you want a good, but budget, different audio interface, the Behringers are surprisingly competent. But the cheapest models don't have 24-bit capability, if I recall correctly...
Mike Stranks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 10589 Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by ef37a »

LOVE to know what the "Sound Card" is?

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19142 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by Alchemy Studio »

thanks for the replies!
actually the soundcard (what a '90 terminology, i agree...) is a creamware / sonic|core pulsar (2 cards, 19 DSP total)

budget will allow also the NT5s... they have half the price of the preamp I was looking... maybe in a longer timeframe i will get both (mics+pre)... but still i don't know! :)
Alchemy Studio
Poster
Posts: 34 Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:00 am
Listen to my music at
www.alchemystudio.it

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by tea for two »

Alchemy Studio wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2022 8:53 am I also wonder if I should change first the amp or first the mics

A kind of analogy I can offer in photography: camera or lens.
Lens will make more of a difference.

Similarly microphone first according to recording requirements makes more of a difference.
A £20 microphone on a £2K audio interface will sound as a £20 microphone.
tea for two
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4009 Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 12:00 am

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by Bob Bickerton »

I’m just thinking that if you had decent mics/preamps for stereo recording, you might not need the isa one. I use the 2 channel Focusrite isa preamp and I really like it (even though I have good preamps on my UAD Apollo). Would a possibility be to sell the isa one, get the isa two and a second tlm102?

Bob
User avatar
Bob Bickerton
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5637 Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 12:00 am Location: Nelson, New Zealand

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by Alchemy Studio »

that could be a wise idea but...
i usually use 3 mics, a mono (neumann thorough the isa one) and the stereo pair. do you think that a simpler stereo neumann configuration could be better than mono+stereo?
my isa one is digital, i would need a stereo preamp with adat or spdif out, the isa two don't have the option... but in this confiuration the ART Digital MPA II could do the work.

in any case thanks for the idea! :)
Alchemy Studio
Poster
Posts: 34 Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:00 am
Listen to my music at
www.alchemystudio.it

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by Drew Stephenson »

The other option to consider would be a single mic with a fig-8 pattern, used in conjunction with the Neumann for mid/side.
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru
Posts: 29713 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by Alchemy Studio »

Hello everyone!
i just wrote a recap because i have finally sold my old samson c02 microphone and ordered a brand new pair of rode NT5 MP (with also new cables...)

now if i just can sell also the old sm tb202 proaudio preamp... :)
Alchemy Studio
Poster
Posts: 34 Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:00 am
Listen to my music at
www.alchemystudio.it

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by tacitus »

Looks as if you’ve got a plan going. I have a cupboard full of C02s (six pairs I think) which I bought really cheaply when I needed more mikes, over better ones.

I’ll get some out and try them; once I’d got some NT55s and Oktava 012s, and the need for lots of anything had receded, I put them away.

I tend not to sell stuff, so they’re still around. I wouldn’t be using them on a school recorder class, but while I used them before to get audible flutes, I’ll have a go now on saxes and bassoon. I don’t remember them being horrible, but they are brighter than say, the Rode M5 which I just bought a pair of and I agree are pretty good: very good for the money (got mine “as new” for £105 the pair. Probably cheaper than my first pair of C02s 15 or so years ago, allowing for inflation).
tacitus
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1582 Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:00 am

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by Alchemy Studio »

Thanks for the comment!

I have another doubt right now.

how my focusrite ISA ONE compare with an 8-channel ADAT preamp such as the Audient ASP800 (880 ) or Focusrite Clarett OctoPre (or other ideas under 1000€)?

one option would be to get rid of the ISA ONE, TB202, and switch to a single preamp with ADAT out.
The other option would be to exchange the TB2020 with the art MPA II digital

but I would not like to sacrifice the quality... so if the ISA one and the ART Digital MPA II are definitely better of Audient or Octopre I would not change...

the switch would definitely simplify my setup and that would be a plus, even if i do not need 8 channels.
Alchemy Studio
Poster
Posts: 34 Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:00 am
Listen to my music at
www.alchemystudio.it

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by James Perrett »

Audient make excellent mic preamps and I'd happily use them in critical applications. I know that one forum member had issues with the early ASP008 but I'm happy with mine.
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 16986 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

Wasn't that related to a digital output word length issue? Or am I thinking of something else?
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 43689 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by orange »

James Perrett wrote: Tue Oct 11, 2022 3:02 pm Audient make excellent mic preamps and I'd happily use them in critical applications.

+1 on this although I think the OP may be chasing phantom 'improvements'

We all like to buy more kit (!) but I suspect that someone who is recording with those budget mics may not see the benefit of more £££ or esoteric preamps. In fact it's probably arguable that most of those £££ preamps aren't actually 'better' just 'different'.

I'm guessing of course, but I suspect the true answer is that money is almost certainly better spent on better acoustics in the recording space and sticking to the budget mic preamps....Any chain is limited by its weakest link.

I also totally accept that this is not advice that most people follow, including me :)
orange
Poster
Posts: 98 Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2020 7:45 pm

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by Alchemy Studio »

Thanks for the comments! 😀

Actually, if the quality would not suffer, so that "more or less" with the Audient pre o would not notice significant"degradation" of the quality, changing my equipment would mean to get rid of some stuff and replace it with a single piece of gear

Right now the tb202 is connected to an old fostex vc8 (adat / analog 8 in/ 8 out). I used it when I had also some hardware synth on my setup, now gone. I really don't need it anymore... :-)

So, supposing to be able to sell the tb202, the vc8 and the isa one, I would end having just the Audient
Alchemy Studio
Poster
Posts: 34 Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:00 am
Listen to my music at
www.alchemystudio.it

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by James Perrett »

Hugh Robjohns wrote: Tue Oct 11, 2022 4:23 pm Wasn't that related to a digital output word length issue? Or am I thinking of something else?

Yes, the word length output was only 16 bits no matter what setting was selected. However, I couldn't reproduce the issue on the ASP008 that I have here and it doesn't apply to the newer ASP800 or ASP880.
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 16986 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by Alchemy Studio »

Just one last question...
the audient 880 should be very OK as a DI for guitar and bass, to be later processed by VST, right?
I'm using the ISA ONE also for this purpose and it does the job very nice. I suppose the results will be similar, right?
Alchemy Studio
Poster
Posts: 34 Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:00 am
Listen to my music at
www.alchemystudio.it

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by orange »

Alchemy Studio wrote: Wed Oct 12, 2022 8:43 am Just one last question...
the audient 880 should be very OK as a DI for guitar and bass, to be later processed by VST, right?

yes - input impedance of the DI is 1megohm
orange
Poster
Posts: 98 Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2020 7:45 pm

Re: Better to change mic or amp?

Post by forumuser840717 »

James Perrett wrote: Tue Oct 11, 2022 9:02 pm
Hugh Robjohns wrote: Tue Oct 11, 2022 4:23 pm Wasn't that related to a digital output word length issue? Or am I thinking of something else?

Yes, the word length output was only 16 bits no matter what setting was selected. However, I couldn't reproduce the issue on the ASP008 that I have here and it doesn't apply to the newer ASP800 or ASP880.


It was actually 20bit. :thumbup:

The longer form is that I had a problem on a job with one of my ASP008s. It wasn't a disaster as I had a spare one to swap in and carried on. Back at base, trying to fault find what had happened (of course I couldn't replicate it!), I put an AES analyser on the output of the faulty unit and noticed that it said that the output was 20bit despite the light on the front of the unit saying 24bit.

Thinking that was odd I toggled through the word length settings and found that the output remained at 20bit, regardless of what the indicator lights said. So I checked another unit and found it was the same. And another.....and another....and... found that all nine ASP008s I had, did exactly the same thing. (I also toggled through the sample rates and found some random ones being output as I ran through the settings indicated - maybe those were part of the problem I'd had the day before? Dunno - didn't persue that after finding the word length thing.)

Not being overly impressed with this, I emailed Audient tech support to find out what was going on. Their inital response was that there were different versions of the AD option card, not all supported the different word lengths, and mine must be that type. It went on to say "You don't really lose performance with this, as the converters do not have the necessary specifications to take advantage of 24 bits word length, and the last 4 bits ended up always being the same value anyway. This is part of the reason why the newer digital boards didn't support the option to change the word length."

Being (more than) a bit surprised at this answer I did a polite "you what?" type email. The reply I received, whilst polite (the tech support folks were always polite - no problem there), didn't improve things as it said that, if my cards don't switch word length when the switch is pressed, then this is normal. Also that the ADAT outputs (which I always understood to be fixed at 24 bit) were actually fixed at 20 bit too. And helpfully explained... "The reason the converters can't take advantage of 24 bits is that the noise floor is about -118dB, so any extra dynamic range over 118dB will just be just taken up by the noise. Word length of 20 bits already provides 120dB of dynamic range, which is more than enough, and 24 bits bumps this up to 144 dB which is complete overkill."

Now being pretty pissed off, I said it would've been nice to know that the outputs were fixed at 20bit rather than switchable regardless of what the front panel indicators said or all the paperwork, which described 24 bit converters with switchable wordlength. The response, from a different tech support person, was "There were various versions of the digital card in the ASP008 some of which were able to produce 24, 20 and 16 bit recordings hence why the option was there initially, however, it wasn't possible to lock out the bit depth selectors when cards which didn't have this functionality were fitted."

That's where I ran out of patience and, rather than send a less than polite "wtf" message I left the discussion there.

My annoyance was partly from being told that the thing behaving other than as advertised, as described in the manual and all other tech documentation, and as indicated by the front panel, was 'normal'. And partly from having been sold something that wasn't as described and when raising this, being told that it didn't matter because I didn't really need the described spec.
anyway as a lower spec was "more than enough" and the advertised version was "complete overkill". Both points on which I may differ.

I understand the logic in the argument that the noise floor of the system can't make full use of 24 bit conversion but that isn't the point. Most of the work I do is live recording or on location stuff where the background noise is higher than the noise floor of a 16 bit converter, let alone 20 or 24 bit but that's not the point either.

If I buy something which is described as offering 24 bit conversion and has the option to output a 24 bit word length and switchability to others I expect it to deliver that. Especially on the days when I'm using a 16 bit link and was going on the basis that selecting the 16 bit output on the converter would deliver an appropriately dithered 16 bit output rather than leaving me unknowingly truncating a 20 bit one. (We just thought the 16 bit output sounded a bit rough compared to the nomal output, put it down to dodgy dithering or some other problem, and made a note not to use it that way unless we really had no choice.)

Ok, so they changed the cards to fixed 20 bit and couldn't lock out the switching but where was the note on the this on the website, in the documentation, or on a sticker or sheet of paper packed with the unit? This can't have been a short term thing since my preamps were acquired over several years and all had the problem card fitted so it's not like there wasn't time to let customers know about it.

I felt and still do feel that in continuing to describe the conversion as 24 bit, without clarifying that it gave a fixed 20 bit output, was misleading/mis-selling it. And with the attitude that it's 'normal' and the implication that I'm wrong in raising it as an issue, my faith the integrity and honesty of the company evaporated and within a few weeks I'd sold all my ASP-008s, (making sure to advertise them as having fixed 20 bit outputs! Though a few people still contactred me to tell me that they were 24 bit.) I also got rid of all my ASP 880s as the whole experience had left me feeling pretty negative towards Audient. (I should make clear that, when tested, none of my ASP 880s had this problem and I was assured that neither it nor the ASP 800 has never been affected by the issue described and both types always output 24 bit.) However, as a result of how this went, I'll neither buy nor reccommend an Audient product again.

Notwithstanding that, I was happy with the sound of Audient's preamps (including in the ASP008) and, as an analogue in - analogue out unit, it's fine. It did make me glad that we usually used it that way and did the conversion elsewhere.
forumuser840717
Regular
Posts: 485 Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2016 5:20 pm
Post Reply