Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

For current or would-be users of Apple Mac computers, with answers to many FAQs.
Post Reply

Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by BigRedX »

I have taken delivery and set up my shiny new Mac Studio, and now I'm discovering all the extra things that I need, which I'd forgotten about.

One is a way of connecting the Mac to my studio amp and speakers. With my previous MacPro I was using the optical output and was very happy with the quality, but obviously there is no optical out on the Mac Studio.

There is a 3.5mm jack socket with a headphones symbol on the back, but I assume using this will disable the internal speakers and I'd prefer not to have various system alert sounds blaring through my monitor speakers, so I was looking for a dedicated good quality audio interface to use.

I have seen some that can extract the audio signal from an HDMI connection which I'm not currently using as all my monitors connect via Thunderbolt. Are these any good?

I don't need audio in because the only external sound sources I will be recording are guitar and bass and those are done using my Helix as an audio input, so just output.

If I really wanted to do some fully-fledged input and outputs I have a Focusrite 18/20 in my live rack that I could use. I'm just looking for something to connect to my studio amp and speakers.

Amp has conventional analogue inputs on phono connectors and digital inputs on S/PDIF phonos and optical.

What do you recommend?
User avatar
BigRedX
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3124 Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:00 am

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by Drew Stephenson »

Something like this maybe?
https://www.amazon.co.uk/SDKDZKG-Extrac ... d_source=1
Keep it digital until it hits the amp?
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru
Posts: 29719 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by BigRedX »

That was the sort of device I was wondering about. Has anyone tried one? Are they any good?
User avatar
BigRedX
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3124 Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:00 am

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by MarkOne »

Just wondering why a 13 quid box from Amazon would have a better audio performance than the 3.5mm jack out on the Mac?

My experience of Macs is that the audio out isn't actually that bad. I've gone direct to a DI from my MacBook pro a couple of times for my MainStage rig and it certainly was far from terrible.
MarkOne
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3052 Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:00 am Location: Bristol, England, Earth, Perseus Gap, Milky Way
My Music on Apple Music
My Music on Spotify

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by BigRedX »

MarkOne wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 4:25 pm Just wondering why a 13 quid box from Amazon would have a better audio performance than the 3.5mm jack out on the Mac?

My experience of Macs is that the audio out isn't actually that bad. I've gone direct to a DI from my MacBook pro a couple of times for my MainStage rig and it certainly was far from terrible.

On all the Macs I have owned before plugging something into the line out or headphone out jack socket kills the internal speakers and routes all the alert sounds to the output device. The great thing about using the optical output of the MacPro Was that I could keep the alert sound low level through the Mac's built-in speaker and just have the important audio piped to my studio monitors. I'd like to keep this arrangement if possible.
User avatar
BigRedX
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3124 Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:00 am

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by James Perrett »

MarkOne wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 4:25 pm Just wondering why a 13 quid box from Amazon would have a better audio performance than the 3.5mm jack out on the Mac?

As I understand it, the intention is to use the optical output rather than the analogue output which will feed a hopefully better quality convertor in the AV receiver.
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 16991 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by Drew Stephenson »

MarkOne wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 4:25 pm Just wondering why a 13 quid box from Amazon would have a better audio performance than the 3.5mm jack out on the Mac?

It doesn't, but the amp might have. You're shifting the DtoA conversion from the inbuilt soundcard to the amp.

EDIT - what James said. ^^^
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru
Posts: 29719 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by OneWorld »

Drew Stephenson wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 3:13 pm Something like this maybe?
https://www.amazon.co.uk/SDKDZKG-Extrac ... d_source=1
Keep it digital until it hits the amp?

I've got something similar, not from Amazon, though I don't suppose that makes any difference, and it works great
OneWorld
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5959 Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:00 am

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by ef37a »

https://cpc.farnell.com/startech/icusba ... =Computing

There are much cheaper USB D/As about and of course very much more expensive 'audiophool' devices but I have always found Startech kit to be OK.

Also, re "system sounds"? The first thing I do with any of my PCs is kill the bleeps and bloops "Stop System Sounds". Do macs not have that facility?

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19147 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by BigRedX »

ef37a wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 8:01 pmAlso, re "system sounds"? The first thing I do with any of my PCs is kill the bleeps and bloops "Stop System Sounds". Do macs not have that facility?

Dave.

Yes they do, but because this computer is primarily for my work some of them like the various email and messages alerts are extremely useful to have on. I just don't want to have them pumped out of my studio speakers at music listening volumes.

Mac's are very good at being able to route different audio events to different outputs, but IME the built-in analogue audio output and the internal speakers are seen as a single destination, hence my desire to add an extra one for music output. Unless anyone with a Mac Studio knows that the internal speakers and headphone output are two different destinations?
User avatar
BigRedX
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3124 Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:00 am

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by ef37a »

BigRedX wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 12:12 pm
ef37a wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 8:01 pmAlso, re "system sounds"? The first thing I do with any of my PCs is kill the bleeps and bloops "Stop System Sounds". Do macs not have that facility?

Dave.

Yes they do, but because this computer is primarily for my work some of them like the various email and messages alerts are extremely useful to have on. I just don't want to have them pumped out of my studio speakers at music listening volumes.

Mac's are very good at being able to route different audio events to different outputs, but IME the built-in analogue audio output and the internal speakers are seen as a single destination, hence my desire to add an extra one for music output. Unless anyone with a Mac Studio knows that the internal speakers and headphone output are two different destinations?

I see, well I would certainly think "USB Audio" would be a valid other destination?

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19147 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by Luke W »

BigRedX wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 12:12 pm Mac's are very good at being able to route different audio events to different outputs, but IME the built-in analogue audio output and the internal speakers are seen as a single destination, hence my desire to add an extra one for music output. Unless anyone with a Mac Studio knows that the internal speakers and headphone output are two different destinations?

I've just tried here on my MBP (running Sonoma 14.6.1) and when I plug a cable into the 3.5mm socket I get External Headphones and Built-in Speakers showing up as two separate audio devices.

I'll try it on my Mac Studio next time I'm at the studio, but I wouldn't have thought it'd be any different. :thumbup:
User avatar
Luke W
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1698 Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:00 am Location: Northamptonshire, UK

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by alexis »

BigRedX wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 12:12 pm ...

this computer is primarily for my work ...

Ah, therein lies the rub, as Robert Kraft surely must have said at some time :D
User avatar
alexis
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5284 Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 12:00 am Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia, USA
Home of the The SLUM Tapes (Shoulda Left Un-Mixed), mangled using Cubase Pro 14; W10 64 bit on Intel i5-4570 3.2GHz,16GB RAM;Steinberg UR28M interface; Juno DS88; UAD2 Solo/Native; Revoice Pro

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by BigRedX »

Luke W wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 12:57 pmI've just tried here on my MBP (running Sonoma 14.6.1) and when I plug a cable into the 3.5mm socket I get External Headphones and Built-in Speakers showing up as two separate audio devices.

I'll try it on my Mac Studio next time I'm at the studio, but I wouldn't have thought it'd be any different. :thumbup:

If that is the case, then it's a welcome change to how it used to be. Certainly the last time I tried it, on a MacPro 3.1, plugging in to the headphones output simply routed anything set to play on the internal speaker to this output.

I'll see if I have a suitable lead with a 3.5mm jack plug and give it a go.
User avatar
BigRedX
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3124 Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:00 am

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by dave_bass5 »

I recently got the Arturia MiniFuse 1. Lovely interface. just the one line in/XLR as im using soft synths so no real need for any analogue inputs (I have other interfaces I could use).
Very small and light, and has meters on the front. It even has a USB A port on the back, which ive found more useful than I thought I would.
dave_bass5
Poster
Posts: 39 Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2022 10:33 pm

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by zenguitar »

Just a thought...

You are using your Helix for audio inputs when required. Does it have outputs as well you could make use of?

Andy :beamup:
User avatar
zenguitar
Moderator
Posts: 13298 Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 12:00 am Location: Devon
There is a profound African saying, "A white man who cannot dance is a victimless crime, whereas a white man with a djembe drum ..."

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by BigRedX »

Luke W wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 12:57 pmI've just tried here on my MBP (running Sonoma 14.6.1) and when I plug a cable into the 3.5mm socket I get External Headphones and Built-in Speakers showing up as two separate audio devices.

I'll try it on my Mac Studio next time I'm at the studio, but I wouldn't have thought it'd be any different. :thumbup:

Just tried it with my headphones and it appears as a new output, so for now the problem is solved. I'll order a 3.5mm jack to phono lead (would you believe I don't actually have one?) and see how I get on with that.

Thanks to everyone who contributed.
User avatar
BigRedX
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3124 Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:00 am

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by Rich Hanson »

Just as a note about audio destination, on my M3 Pro MacBook you can separately route to the internal speaker and to the headphone output (as I found out when I wanted to listen to something in the office, plugged in my headphones and woke up my colleagues when I hit play because it was still coming out of the speakers :D I would assume the Mac Studio would work the same way)
User avatar
Rich Hanson
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3686 Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 12:00 am Location: Sort of near Rochester, Kent, UK

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by BigRedX »

Rich Hanson wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2024 10:06 am Just as a note about audio destination, on my M3 Pro MacBook you can separately route to the internal speaker and to the headphone output (as I found out when I wanted to listen to something in the office, plugged in my headphones and woke up my colleagues when I hit play because it was still coming out of the speakers :D I would assume the Mac Studio would work the same way)

As I have discovered and mentioned in my previous post.

However having obtained a suitable 3.5jack to phono lead, there is a slight but noticeable difference in audio quality between the same file played from the Mac Studio via this lead and played from my MacPro using the optical output and applying D/A conversion at the amp.

Does using the HDMI output apply any data compression to the audio stream?
User avatar
BigRedX
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3124 Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:00 am

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by tea for two »

https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/focusrite-vrm-box
I use this usb small Focusrite Vrm Box aboot 15 squid used 2nd hand on my mac.
tea for two
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4009 Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 12:00 am

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by Rich Hanson »

BigRedX wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2024 10:53 am
Rich Hanson wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2024 10:06 am Just as a note about audio destination, on my M3 Pro MacBook you can separately route to the internal speaker and to the headphone output (as I found out when I wanted to listen to something in the office, plugged in my headphones and woke up my colleagues when I hit play because it was still coming out of the speakers :D I would assume the Mac Studio would work the same way)

As I have discovered and mentioned in my previous post.

Oops, missed that!

However having obtained a suitable 3.5jack to phono lead, there is a slight but noticeable difference in audio quality between the same file played from the Mac Studio via this lead and played from my MacPro using the optical output and applying D/A conversion at the amp.

Does using the HDMI output apply any data compression to the audio stream?

I did connect my MacBook to my AV amp with HDMI recently and pretty sure the amp reported PCM so that indicates it is uncompressed.
User avatar
Rich Hanson
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3686 Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 12:00 am Location: Sort of near Rochester, Kent, UK

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by BigRedX »

Rich Hanson wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2024 12:16 pmI did connect my MacBook to my AV amp with HDMI recently and pretty sure the amp reported PCM so that indicates it is uncompressed.

Thank you.
User avatar
BigRedX
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3124 Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:00 am

Re: Simple, But Good Quality Interface For Audio Out

Post by BigRedX »

tea for two wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2024 10:57 amhttps://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/focusrite-vrm-box
I use this usb small Focusrite Vrm Box aboot 15 squid used 2nd hand on my mac.

I'm sure it's fine for your needs, but I need something to connect to my studio amp rather than headphones only.

And even if it was possible to buy one the "latest" version of the software is over 10 years old, so probably won't work with a brand new Mac Studio.
User avatar
BigRedX
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3124 Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:00 am
Post Reply