.m4a vs .mp3

For everything after the recording stage: hardware/software and how you use it.
Post Reply

.m4a vs .mp3

Post by alexis »

Hi,

I came across the .m4a file type for the first time recently, it is the format my Android "Voice Recorder" app uses.

I read on the link below that .m4a files are higher quality than .mp3 files but take up less space, so I thought maybe it was a no brainer - that I should convert to the former when I didn't need to convert to .wav.

But reading further, the linked-to article also said .m4a file can only be played on Apple devices (which I know isn't true because I played one on my W10 computer), so I'm a little unsure how reliable it is.

Amy thoughts on .m4a files, esp in relation to quality vs. .mp3 (or flac), would be much appreciated!

Thank you :)

https://allsoundlab.net/mp3-vs-m4a/

(Mods: please move to more appropriate location as you see fit. I couldn't tell if the PC forum was better than this Lounge, since the linked to article said mp4 was just an Apple construct, but since I used it on PC and Android, I just couldn't tell :crazy: ! Thanks. )
User avatar
alexis
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5284 Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 12:00 am Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia, USA
Home of the The SLUM Tapes (Shoulda Left Un-Mixed), mangled using Cubase Pro 14; W10 64 bit on Intel i5-4570 3.2GHz,16GB RAM;Steinberg UR28M interface; Juno DS88; UAD2 Solo/Native; Revoice Pro

Re: .m4a vs .mp3

Post by zenguitar »

Moved to the mixing/mastering/production forum as it's a question about a delivery format.

:thumbup:

Andy :beamup:
User avatar
zenguitar
Moderator
Posts: 13295 Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 12:00 am Location: Devon
There is a profound African saying, "A white man who cannot dance is a victimless crime, whereas a white man with a djembe drum ..."

Re: .m4a vs .mp3

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

The .m4a extension denotes the audio container from the mp4 format and normally contains either the loss-less ALAC format (Apple Lossless Audio Codec) or the lossy AAC (Advanced Audio Codec) — both unencrypted.

ALAC is apple's equivalent of FLAC and, like that alternative, reduces the original linear file to about half the size.

AAC is a much more advanced and efficient lossy codec than .mp3, so manages similar sound quality at smaller file sizes (or better quality for similar file sizes).

Years back, AAC and ALAC weren't widely supported outside Fruit-land, but now they both are.

I use ALAC in the .m4a format for my music library because it occupies half the space of ripped .wav files, and it has all the same metadata features as .mp3 — embedded artwork, composer /artist /performer /date /genre /etc.

Personally, I wouldn't convert .mp3 files to .m4a. Concatenated lossy formats can only degrade quality and the small file size gain would be pointless given the sound quality reduction.

But converting .wavs into ALAC is loss-less and convenient, and AAC is very good when file size is an issue for an end-listener.

And both formats are supported very well now on all platforms and streamers.
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 43691 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: .m4a vs .mp3

Post by adrian_k »

That link has a whiff of being written by AI as click bait to me. Either way it is wrong, m4a files (Apple lossless) can be played on various platforms since an open source decoder was developed years ago. VLC can certainly play them on my PC.

It’s true that m4a is claimed to be lossless. I’m not sure if the files are smaller than mp3, I guess that would depend on the mp3 bitrate.

Edit: ninja’d!
adrian_k
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3813 Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2003 12:00 am Location: Gloucestershire
Life is wealth. (John Ruskin)

Re: .m4a vs .mp3

Post by alexis »

Thank you Hugh and adrian_k (and zenguitar!) :)
User avatar
alexis
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5284 Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 12:00 am Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia, USA
Home of the The SLUM Tapes (Shoulda Left Un-Mixed), mangled using Cubase Pro 14; W10 64 bit on Intel i5-4570 3.2GHz,16GB RAM;Steinberg UR28M interface; Juno DS88; UAD2 Solo/Native; Revoice Pro

Re: .m4a vs .mp3

Post by James Perrett »

adrian_k wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2024 10:07 pm It’s true that m4a is claimed to be lossless. I’m not sure if the files are smaller than mp3, I guess that would depend on the mp3 bitrate.

As Hugh says, m4a is just a container that can contain either lossy or lossless files. You need some way of analysing the contents to tell whether the file is lossless or not (although you could probably get a good idea from the file size).
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 16989 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: .m4a vs .mp3

Post by BWC »

James Perrett wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2024 10:30 pm You need some way of analysing the contents to tell whether the file is lossless or not...

Something like...
https://mediaarea.net/en/MediaInfo
BWC
Frequent Poster
Posts: 901 Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 9:12 am Location: FL, US
BWC

Re: .m4a vs .mp3

Post by adrian_k »

James Perrett wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2024 10:30 pm
adrian_k wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2024 10:07 pm It’s true that m4a is claimed to be lossless. I’m not sure if the files are smaller than mp3, I guess that would depend on the mp3 bitrate.

As Hugh says, m4a is just a container that can contain either lossy or lossless files. You need some way of analysing the contents to tell whether the file is lossless or not (although you could probably get a good idea from the file size).

Ah thank you, I hadn’t appreciated that m4a files could contain AAC data.
adrian_k
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3813 Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2003 12:00 am Location: Gloucestershire
Life is wealth. (John Ruskin)
Post Reply