Hi,
i appreciate how basic this is, and while i can assume the difference and implications...can someone simply state the pro's and con's of stereo/mono reverbs.
I am about to take the plunge and buy my first plugin reverbs
short list is:
Valahalla VV/shimmer,
Exponential R2/phoeneix bundle
NI reverb classics
your help will be very much appreciated
steve
mono and stereo reverbs. what are the implications
mono and stereo reverbs. what are the implications
-
- Guest
Re: mono and stereo reverbs. what are the implications
Not sure I understand.
Are you looking for:
+/- of stereo versus mono reverb
or
+/- of the reverbs on your short list?
Are you looking for:
+/- of stereo versus mono reverb
or
+/- of the reverbs on your short list?
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
Re: mono and stereo reverbs. what are the implications
in short ... Stereo reverbs give a wide sense of space as well as some depth ...
and mono reverbs can give a big sense of depth and ...
are often used with a sound such as guitar, or panned away form a sound in a mix.
An example: a shortish stereo reverb on, with a longer mono reverb with say 60ms pre-delay can make a better sense of space than just one or the other sort.
Best to experiment ... have fun.
and mono reverbs can give a big sense of depth and ...
are often used with a sound such as guitar, or panned away form a sound in a mix.
An example: a shortish stereo reverb on, with a longer mono reverb with say 60ms pre-delay can make a better sense of space than just one or the other sort.
Best to experiment ... have fun.
- Guy Johnson
Frequent Poster -
Posts: 1336 Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 12:00 am
Location: North Pembrokeshire
Contact:
This is my few words.
Re: mono and stereo reverbs. what are the implications
sorry to be unclear. it was +/- of mono/stereo i was asking about
-
- Guest
Re: mono and stereo reverbs. what are the implications
OK, thanks for clarifying.
Mono and stereo reverb both have their place, but I think it fair to say that stereo reverb is the more commonly used. It helps to create space, depth and placement.
My use of mono reverb is relatively restrained, but I may choose it to:
HTH!
Mono and stereo reverb both have their place, but I think it fair to say that stereo reverb is the more commonly used. It helps to create space, depth and placement.
My use of mono reverb is relatively restrained, but I may choose it to:
- help balance a panned mono part, by placing the reverb at opposite panning.
- create a sense of distance - the more distant a sound with reverb, the less stereo width we hear.
- create a short 'smudged delay'. This can be more appealing than a hard-edged delay in some circumstances.
- simulate a mono room mic. Sometimes I add a bright mono reverb to a snare to give it more sustain and help it sit better in stereo centre.
HTH!
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
Re: mono and stereo reverbs. what are the implications
The Elf wrote:HTH!
Dunno about the OP but it does help me. Such a newby as I am I'd not thought about ways of using reverb in mono. Ta.
CC
- ConcertinaChap
Jedi Poster -
Posts: 15240 Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Bradford on Avon
Contact:
Making music: Eagle Alley
Recording music: Mr Punch's Studio
Sir, more than kisses, letters mingle souls. - John Donne
Recording music: Mr Punch's Studio
Sir, more than kisses, letters mingle souls. - John Donne
Re: mono and stereo reverbs. what are the implications
Good points made there.
It's also worth thinking about using pads/samples in mono (or narrow stereo) in mixes as well as mono reverbs.
It's also worth thinking about using pads/samples in mono (or narrow stereo) in mixes as well as mono reverbs.
- Guy Johnson
Frequent Poster -
Posts: 1336 Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 12:00 am
Location: North Pembrokeshire
Contact:
This is my few words.
Re: mono and stereo reverbs. what are the implications
great and helpful remarks. appreciated.
A thread at 'another place' bemoaned the fact of 'another stereo reverb release'.
I wonder now if a stereo plug in can be manipulated to be mono?
p.s. i also found the link to paul whites 'stereo mixing' which helps too.
extra thought: are the scare stories about ilok2 problems a reality? I have never had an ilok so it would be a new account and only to manage2 or 3 plug ins at most (straight face while wife looking over shoulder!)
A thread at 'another place' bemoaned the fact of 'another stereo reverb release'.
I wonder now if a stereo plug in can be manipulated to be mono?
p.s. i also found the link to paul whites 'stereo mixing' which helps too.
extra thought: are the scare stories about ilok2 problems a reality? I have never had an ilok so it would be a new account and only to manage2 or 3 plug ins at most (straight face while wife looking over shoulder!)
-
- Guest
Re: mono and stereo reverbs. what are the implications
I have an answer and another question... (related...)
1. I have Valhalla (although Room and Vintage, not Shimmer). I think they're absolutely amazing. I've trialled the NI Classic reverbs in the past - they were good, and although I didn't have that at the same time as Valhalla to do an A/B, I remember actually being taken aback at how great Valhalla sounded when I first heard them. Best £60 spend of my studio, without a doubt.
2. I was having an issue yesterday with the fact that when listening to a stereo mix in mono, resolving to mono seemed to drain a lot bass out of the reverb, and out of the mix in general. It was just a vocal/guitar live thing - both recorded in mono. Seemed to be a fairly insurmountable problem given how basic the track was - perhaps a situation where I should try committing myself to an entirely mono mix and using a mono reverb?
1. I have Valhalla (although Room and Vintage, not Shimmer). I think they're absolutely amazing. I've trialled the NI Classic reverbs in the past - they were good, and although I didn't have that at the same time as Valhalla to do an A/B, I remember actually being taken aback at how great Valhalla sounded when I first heard them. Best £60 spend of my studio, without a doubt.
2. I was having an issue yesterday with the fact that when listening to a stereo mix in mono, resolving to mono seemed to drain a lot bass out of the reverb, and out of the mix in general. It was just a vocal/guitar live thing - both recorded in mono. Seemed to be a fairly insurmountable problem given how basic the track was - perhaps a situation where I should try committing myself to an entirely mono mix and using a mono reverb?
- molecular
Frequent Poster -
Posts: 1318 Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Skye / Stroud / Seyðisfjorður
Contact:
Anto mo Ninja, Watashi mo Ninja http://www.hectormacinnes.com
Re: mono and stereo reverbs. what are the implications
sabletones wrote:I wonder now if a stereo plug in can be manipulated to be mono?
Sure. Just pan both sides of the reverb to the same place. Or group the reverb to a mono group channel. Or insert the reverb into a mono FX slot. Or mute one side of the reverb. Each method will have a slightly different result, but it's not a big deal - try each and see what you get.
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
Re: mono and stereo reverbs. what are the implications
{raises hand}
Another interesting effect is to start with a stereo reverb on, say, a trailing note and slowly morph it to mono, and pan it to one side at the same time, also playing with the EQ at the same time.
Another interesting effect is to start with a stereo reverb on, say, a trailing note and slowly morph it to mono, and pan it to one side at the same time, also playing with the EQ at the same time.
- Folderol
Forum Aficionado -
Posts: 20887 Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:00 am
Location: The Mudway Towns, UK
Contact:
Seemingly no longer an 'elderly'.
Now a 'Senior'. Is that promotion?
Now a 'Senior'. Is that promotion?