Taming resonances

For everything after the recording stage: hardware/software and how you use it.

Re: Taming resonances

Post by ore_terra »

MegaBacher wrote: Sat Jun 03, 2023 9:50 pm
1st - C-Vox Noise Reduction Plugin
2nd - SPL Transient Designer
3rd - Fabfilter Pro Q3 Equalizer set to a high-Q dynamic response on that resonant freq.
4th - Voxengo's TEOTE set to mastering, fluid response and flat EQ.

Just following the logic of that chain. Sounds rather smart! Sort of DIY soothe 😀
What’s the TEOTE doing in the chain? I’m not familiar with that plugin
User avatar
ore_terra
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1073 Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 12:56 pm Location: Seville - Spain
casmoestudio.com

Re: Taming resonances

Post by Drew Stephenson »

I'd generally look at a dynamic EQ (TDR Nova is my choice) or a bit of Sound Theory's Gullfoss can do a good job.
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru
Posts: 27699 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: Taming resonances

Post by Drew Stephenson »

Tim Gillett wrote: Sat Jun 03, 2023 11:31 pmCan anyone identify the basic correction needed in terms of frequency, Q and decibels?

https://youtu.be/O3Jup5jpxaA

Not without downloading it and playing around for a while! :)
Trying to 'correct' an entire mix is a bit of a different kettle of fish to tackling a resonance in a specific track though.
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru
Posts: 27699 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: Taming resonances

Post by Tim Gillett »

Drew Stephenson wrote: Sun Jun 04, 2023 3:30 pm
Tim Gillett wrote: Sat Jun 03, 2023 11:31 pmCan anyone identify the basic correction needed in terms of frequency, Q and decibels?

https://youtu.be/O3Jup5jpxaA

Not without downloading it and playing around for a while! :)
Trying to 'correct' an entire mix is a bit of a different kettle of fish to tackling a resonance in a specific track though.

Well of course it requires a little work but for anyone with good listening skills, it should be obvious there's a harsh peak in the midrange, making listening unpleasant. With the great FFT spectral analysis tools around for decades now it's made so much easier too. We not only hear the problem but see it on the screen. I did the fix in under 5 minutes, which applies to the entire 3 hours or so of the still very popular surviving Dusty Springfield TV shows. But it seems one static EQ tweak of one midband of a mono soundtrack was too much for the relevent BBC audio remastering staff...
Tim Gillett
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2696 Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:00 am Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: Taming resonances

Post by apaclin »

I saw this video recently, where a dude uses eq in a linear phase and notches to reduce the resonances. So how does it combine when a guy has 3 grammies, but causes pre-ringing by doing that (linear phase + narrow qs)?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/cWYfvkmfC1k
apaclin
Regular
Posts: 159 Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2020 5:00 pm

Re: Taming resonances

Post by Drew Stephenson »

Most audio tweakery is compromise, it's trying to find the one that delivers the best benefit whilst causing the least harm. This will vary from track to track depending on the composition, the recording, the room, the arrangement and everything else - it's why there really are no rules but plenty of guidelines and suggestions. And why most problems have multiple possible solutions.
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru
Posts: 27699 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: Taming resonances

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

Tim Gillett wrote: Sun Jun 04, 2023 4:54 pmBut it seems one static EQ tweak of one midband of a mono soundtrack was too much for the relevent BBC audio remastering staff...

The video wasn't posted on YouTube from an official BBC source.... :roll: so who knows where it came from or what happened to it en route. But I'm sure we are all deeply impressed that your audio abilities are so far beyond everyone else's. Well done. :lol:
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 41729 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: Taming resonances

Post by Tim Gillett »

Hugh Robjohns wrote: Sun Jun 04, 2023 10:44 pm
Tim Gillett wrote: Sun Jun 04, 2023 4:54 pmBut it seems one static EQ tweak of one midband of a mono soundtrack was too much for the relevent BBC audio remastering staff...

The video wasn't posted on YouTube from an official BBC source.... :roll: so who knows where it came from or what happened to it en route...

The source I used was an official "Dusty Live at the BBC" DVD set but the YT source I cited here demonstrates the ugly mid range peak very well. Again, not a difficult or time consuming fix.
Tim Gillett
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2696 Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:00 am Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: Taming resonances

Post by sonics »

apaclin wrote: Sat Jun 03, 2023 7:15 pm Do you use Soothe2 to tame resonances or do you tame them with equaliser, if so with dynamic bands or regular ones and why?

And what do you think about it in general?

Which resonances, exactly? ;)

Resonances that typically need attending to would be things like room (for example a badly-recorded track) and vocal. I avoid fixating on that sort of thing when mixing music. Balancing sound for video and TV is another matter, and that's where I use more of the various tools to control frequency peaks.

I saw some crazy guy on YouTube slicing into a guitar track with lots of narrow cuts. That was endorsed by a very popular (and professional) audio YouTuber! :lolno:

I use what's appropriate; sometimes surgical EQ, sometimes broad dynamic EQ moves, and sometimes specialised plugins. We should all make sure there's a problem before we go slapping Soothe on every track. Now that's a quick way to make bland-sounding music!

WRT the Dusty track, any engineer (esp live sound) worth their salt would be straight onto that nasal honk. If only improving the background singers were that easy! :lol:
sonics
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2028 Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 12:00 am Location: Canada
 

Re: Taming resonances

Post by amanise »

Hugh Robjohns wrote: Sun Jun 04, 2023 10:44 pm
Tim Gillett wrote: Sun Jun 04, 2023 4:54 pmBut it seems one static EQ tweak of one midband of a mono soundtrack was too much for the relevent BBC audio remastering staff...

The video wasn't posted on YouTube from an official BBC source....

Go you Hugh! We just can't have them treating Aunty like this :bouncy:
amanise
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4257 Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2023 1:45 pm
Adrian Manise
https://adrianmanise.bandcamp.com/
https://soundcloud.com/adrian-manise
A name to strike fear into the hearts of A&R people everywhere...
:headbang:

Re: Taming resonances

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

Well... you know... facts are facts and I object to falsehoods, especially when presented with an unwarranted sense of superiority!

In the 60s the Beeb was using the Ampex Quadruplex format video recorders which ran 2-inch tape costing around £120 an hour (equivalent to about £2,500 a reel in todays money!)... So not surprisingly, the beeb wiped and reused those tapes routinely. That policy was still in place when I joined the Beeb in the 80s, and we were re-using each reel of 1-inch C-format video tape on average 5 times before it was scrapped. A programme had to be deemed extremely important to have the tape archived long-term.

It is a matter of record that the tapes from those BBC Dusty Springfield shows in 1966 and 67 (and I think 1969, too) were wiped — along with countless other shows and series along the way. Lost Dr Who and Dad's Army episodes were high profile examples. At the time, none of those shows were considered valuable enough to warrant long-term archiving of the tapes. Today, with a different perspective, those decisions may appear foolish but that's just the reality and practicality of way it was back then.

So... the 'Dusty at the BBC' DVD's referred to were actually produced and released by Universal — not the BBC — and created from recovered material obtained from private archives of home recordings. I've no idea what quality material Universal started with, but I'd be very surprised if they made it any worse, and in all likelihood they worked hard to make it as good as they could in the circumstances.

I'd say the sound on the YT presentation is seriously lacking bass rather than just having a mid-range hump — possibly to reduce recorded hum? — but we all listen with different ears.

A quick scan of some comments on Amazon reveals that many people have complained about the sound quality, although one I read suggested that "Those clips broadcast by the BBC were far more rounded and wholesome than these..." Presumably that commentator has a very good memory! :lol:

Anyway, the point is that Tim's unnecessary put down was well wide of the mark... And not for the first time.

Still, it's the Internet, innit? Purpose-designed to make it easy to criticise people you don't know, over things they had nothing to do with, from a position of zero knowledge and less respect. :madas:
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 41729 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: Taming resonances

Post by amanise »

Hugh Robjohns wrote: Mon Jun 05, 2023 3:33 pm ...Still, it's the Internet, innit? Purpose-designed to make it easy to criticise people you don't know, over things they had nothing to do with, from a position of zero knowledge and less respect. :madas:

...and often from the safety of anonymous accounts with funny Avatars and usernames. Its a brave new world. The only criticism I have (as one who knows nothing about anything and has even fewer friends) of everything you've expressed here is that it's spelt R.E.S.P.E.K. now I believe. Innit. :crazy:

Aunty Beeb gets a lot of unfair criticism in my book. The more you travel and see what the rest of the world get served up in the guise of current affairs and entertainment - the more you value it. (Dons flack jacket, gas mask AND steel helmet)
amanise
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4257 Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2023 1:45 pm
Adrian Manise
https://adrianmanise.bandcamp.com/
https://soundcloud.com/adrian-manise
A name to strike fear into the hearts of A&R people everywhere...
:headbang:

Re: Taming resonances

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

amanise wrote: Mon Jun 05, 2023 4:11 pmAunty Beeb gets a lot of unfair criticism in my book.

There's plenty of things the Beeb has done that deserve fair criticism, and I've no issue with that, but it doesn't need to be blamed for things unfairly!

And yes, for all it's faults broadcasting is in a far worse state in many other parts of the world
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 41729 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: Taming resonances

Post by Tim Gillett »

sonics wrote: Mon Jun 05, 2023 3:05 am
...WRT the Dusty track, any engineer (esp live sound) worth their salt would be straight onto that nasal honk.


Thanks for your comment.

sonics wrote: Mon Jun 05, 2023 3:05 am

If only improving the background singers were that easy! :lol:


The backing vocalists were top drawer and accompanied not only Dusty but other top performers back then. The track I cited is probably not the best example of their work even on the Dusty shows as they're singing a refrain in unison and possibly mixed a little too high IMO. And back then no foldback for the performers I guess.

In this other song the three of them, Madeline Bell, Lesley Duncan and Barbara Moore are featured and to my ears they sing a sweet three part harmony complementing Dusty's great vocal.
https://youtu.be/8XUsBkdN7Zs

IMO top shelf stuff from the BBC, produced by the great Stanley Dorfman which deserved better handling of the surviving audio some 40 years later. Yes, something to do with taming resonances, the title of this thread.
Tim Gillett
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2696 Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:00 am Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: Taming resonances

Post by Tim Gillett »

Hugh Robjohns wrote: Mon Jun 05, 2023 3:33 pm
I'd say the sound on the YT presentation is seriously lacking bass rather than just having a mid-range hump — possibly to reduce recorded hum? — but we all listen with different ears.

I agree the bass might do with some boost but my main focus is the mid range because that's where our ears are most sensitive and where especially the vocal shriek/squawk/honk colouring occurs. Obviously the Dusty shows are very much focussed on the vocals. We're fortunate to have the reference of Dusty's own voice on her studio and other good quality live recordings, and that's what I've used as my EQ reference. I plan to upload a video to YT with the EQ change(s) toggled in and out. Then as to whether it's an improvement, people can make up their own minds and express their own views...
Tim Gillett
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2696 Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:00 am Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: Taming resonances

Post by Urthlupe »

Tim Gillett wrote: Tue Jun 06, 2023 3:15 pm I plan to upload a video to YT with the EQ change(s) toggled in and out. Then as to whether it's an improvement, people can make up their own minds and express their own views...

Hee hee…… that really made me giggle…. :bouncy:

Loopy
User avatar
Urthlupe
Frequent Poster
Posts: 614 Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:00 am Location: West Midlands/Pembrokeshire UK

Re: Taming resonances

Post by MegaBacher »

ore_terra wrote: Sun Jun 04, 2023 10:49 am
MegaBacher wrote: Sat Jun 03, 2023 9:50 pm
1st - C-Vox Noise Reduction Plugin
2nd - SPL Transient Designer
3rd - Fabfilter Pro Q3 Equalizer set to a high-Q dynamic response on that resonant freq.
4th - Voxengo's TEOTE set to mastering, fluid response and flat EQ.

Just following the logic of that chain. Sounds rather smart! Sort of DIY soothe 😀
What’s the TEOTE doing in the chain? I’m not familiar with that plugin

Voxengo's TEOTE is a paid native dynamic EQ plugin, mainly for mastering use. You set the amount of EQ bands you want to use (up to 64) between the freqs you want to correct, and the plugin will either push or pull EQ on bands that need to be pushed or pulled. The acronym stands for "That's Easy on the Ears" and it's made to be used in a subtle manner to correct mild EQ issues.
User avatar
MegaBacher
Poster
Posts: 69 Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:00 am Location: Omaha, Nebraska

Re: Taming resonances

Post by Matt Houghton »

Tomás Mulcahy wrote: Sun Jun 04, 2023 1:05 am TDR Nova is great but you have to tune it yourself.

IIRC, the paid (but still inexpensive) GE version has a resonance detection/suppression feature.
Matt Houghton
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1446 Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:00 am
SOS Reviews Editor

Re: Taming resonances

Post by Tomás Mulcahy »

Matt Houghton wrote: Fri Jul 14, 2023 4:35 pm
Tomás Mulcahy wrote: Sun Jun 04, 2023 1:05 am TDR Nova is great but you have to tune it yourself.

IIRC, the paid (but still inexpensive) GE version has a resonance detection/suppression feature.

Yes thank you for the correction. I only learned about that recently. It's really very very good!
User avatar
Tomás Mulcahy
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2776 Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:00 am Location: Cork, Ireland.

Re: Taming resonances

Post by sonics »

Another thumbs up for the Nova GE here, as well as the other TDR plugins!
sonics
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2028 Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 12:00 am Location: Canada
 
Post Reply