Complete throwaway topic, but the TLM103 is definitely harsh sounding.

Discuss hardware/software tools and techniques involved in capturing sound, in the studio, live or on location.

Re: Complete throwaway topic, but the TLM103 is definitely harsh sounding.

Post by Mike Stranks »

Interesting that the Austrian Audio OC18 was mentioned above...

In my YouTube wanderings among my few subscriptions this afternoon I noticed that Podcastage was talking about his gear of the year. This guy reviews many, many mics each year at all price points. His 'mic of the year'? The Austrian Audio OC18...

SoS Review is here: https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/austrian-audio-oc818-oc18

So probably worth checking-out...
Last edited by Mike Stranks on Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mike Stranks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 10589 Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Complete throwaway topic, but the TLM103 is definitely harsh sounding.

Post by CS70 »

Sam Spoons wrote:So, since the subject has been raised, if I was to ask for suggestions for a single LDC to use for a baritone male voice that doesn't have much body (mine) what would you suggest, budget up to, maybe, £1200? I currently have a SE 2200 and a Blue Reactor and dodgy hearing above 10kHz.

Someone said Mojave MA-200 ?
User avatar
CS70
Longtime Poster
Posts: 7799 Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 12:00 am Location: Oslo, Norway
Silver Spoon - Check out our latest video and the FB page

Re: Complete throwaway topic, but the TLM103 is definitely harsh sounding.

Post by Arpangel »

Tomás Mulcahy wrote:I dunno, I can always tell it's a 414 B-ULS. They're kinda metallic. Kinda sibilant on voices. It's subtle but it's there.

That exactly describes how I heard it at the time, but back then my hearing was a lot better than it is now. I’m finding a lot of stuff I didn’t like because of high frequency issues sounds great to me now.
Last edited by Arpangel on Wed Dec 23, 2020 7:56 am, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Arpangel
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 21957 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am
"I will not say: do not weep; for not all tears are an evil" Gandalf - J.R.R. Tolkien.

Re: Complete throwaway topic, but the TLM103 is definitely harsh sounding.

Post by Random Guitarist »

Sam Spoons wrote:So, since the subject has been raised, if I was to ask for suggestions for a single LDC to use for a baritone male voice that doesn't have much body (mine) what would you suggest, budget up to, maybe, £1200? I currently have a SE 2200 and a Blue Reactor and dodgy hearing above 10kHz.

Soundelux U195 maybe? I have one from when they were made/sold as Bock. Has a big smooth sound.
Random Guitarist
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1207 Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:00 am Location: West Sussex UK
I've never liked a solo violin, you need at least five for a proper fire.

Re: Complete throwaway topic, but the TLM103 is definitely harsh sounding.

Post by Len »

I have both the TLM 103 and the 414 B-ULS. The 103 is definitely not something I would use on everything. I have a baritone-ish voice and it gives a nice "radio friendly" sound to my singing voice. I pretty much apply no EQ at all other than a roll off at 80hz. But I pretty much never use the 103 on say acoustic guitar, where the 414 is much nicer to my ears.

Here is a recent video of me using the TLM 103 and the 414 B-ULS (the SDC is a Telefunken M-60): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqoTnV9OVIU

Listen to the vocal - hardly any EQ, just light compression. The main guitar sounded great with just the M-60 alone, but unfortunately there was quite a lot of bleed into the TLM103, which affected the sound negatively since it was a very off-axis 103 sound mixed with the M-60.

The second guitar and nylon were both recorded with the 414 B-ULS. Note that the second guitar and the nylon guitars are pretty cheap guitars (compared to the main guitar which is a Larrivee L-09) but the 414 made them sound great!

Anyway, my two pennies worth. Happy Christmas!
Last edited by Len on Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Len
Poster
Posts: 96 Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2001 12:00 am Location: London, UK

Re: Complete throwaway topic, but the TLM103 is definitely harsh sounding.

Post by John Willett »

Sam Spoons wrote:So, since the subject has been raised, if I was to ask for suggestions for a single LDC to use for a baritone male voice that doesn't have much body (mine) what would you suggest, budget up to, maybe, £1200? I currently have a SE 2200 and a Blue Reactor and dodgy hearing above 10kHz.

Answered via PM with some suggestions as I don't want Hugh to get cross with me ;)
User avatar
John Willett
Longtime Poster
Posts: 7297 Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 12:00 am Location: Oxfordshire UK
John
Sound-Link ProAudio
Circle Sound Services
Sound-Link are UK Distributors for: Microtech Gefell, ME-Geithain, AETA, HUM, Håkan, Meyer Turtle

Re: Complete throwaway topic, but the TLM103 is definitely harsh sounding.

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

:lol::angel:
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 43693 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: Complete throwaway topic, but the TLM103 is definitely harsh sounding.

Post by Tomás Mulcahy »

Hugh Robjohns wrote:Edge terminated diaphragms are more likely to exhibit these potential issues than centre-terminated ones for obvious reasons.

Interesting! The reasons are not obvious to me though :lol: Is it because the centre termination doubles the resonant frequency i.e. the resonance is now the radius, not the diameter?
User avatar
Tomás Mulcahy
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3007 Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:00 am Location: Cork, Ireland.

Re: Complete throwaway topic, but the TLM103 is definitely harsh sounding.

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

Yes, and entirely different breakup modes.
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 43693 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: Complete throwaway topic, but the TLM103 is definitely harsh sounding.

Post by Tomás Mulcahy »

This is the kind of voodoo/ physics that really impresses me. Real mic designers are amazing- the ones that do their own capsules. Years ago when trying the 3D Audio Mic CD, I consistently chose the AT-4033a because it was the only one without that whispery/ shadowy thing.

Listening on the amazing Audiotestkitchen site, all the AT LD condensers lack this quality. The consistency of their "sound family" is impressive too. They just get smoother sounding as the price goes up :) The AT2020 is regularly favoured for VO by our students, who have a range of Rode LDs, a C414 B XLS and a U87a to chose from!
Last edited by Tomás Mulcahy on Sat Dec 26, 2020 9:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Tomás Mulcahy
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3007 Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:00 am Location: Cork, Ireland.

Re: Complete throwaway topic, but the TLM103 is definitely harsh sounding.

Post by Aled Hughes »

Tomás Mulcahy wrote:This is the kind of voodoo/ physics that really impresses me. Real mic designers are amazing- the ones that do their own capsules. Years ago when trying the 3D Audio Mic CD, I consistently chose the AT-4033a because it was the only one without that whispery/ shadowy thing.

Listening on the amazing Audiotestkitchen site, all the AT LD condensers lack this quality. The consistency of their "sound family" is impressive too. They just get smoother sounding as the price goes up :) The AT2020 is regularly favoured for VO by our students, who have a range of Rode LDs, a C414 B XLS and a U87a to chose from!

Interesting. I always felt my AT4050 added a sort of subtle high end whisper/resonance/something or other. More so than the U87/Sony C48/AA 818/414 LDCs I usually use. In the end I sold it because of it.

There are AT4033s at the studio but I’ve never used them- I shall have to give them a go.
Aled Hughes
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2136 Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:00 am Location: Pwllheli, Cymru

Re: Complete throwaway topic, but the TLM103 is definitely harsh sounding.

Post by Tomás Mulcahy »

That's really interesting. I've never used a 4050. I recall Hugh's review of the AKG 412 being a bit more neutral than the 414? And he's often pointed out that a fixed omni is more neutral than two diaphragms combined.
User avatar
Tomás Mulcahy
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3007 Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:00 am Location: Cork, Ireland.
Post Reply