space cap wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 6:19 pm...in theory could you plug in practically any...mic or something into it and would it still have the dynamic range benefits of the 32-bit recording?
Yes... although the dynamic range of cheap mics is likely to be less than that of more expensive alternatives.
I was wondering, are most microphones capable of I guess "recording" the dynamic range of sounds that the recorder would then "record"? Or are there certain mics only that have the hardware capable of even receiving that range of sound?
The benefit of the 32bit floating-point option is not so much about capturing bigger dynamic ranges but more about not having to carefully optimise the preamp gain for a given dynamic range coming from the mic.
In most cases, the recorder will capture whatever the mic throws at it, regardless of how much the mic cost. ...And better mics give a better quality of sound.
Is that basically what the "frequency response" spec is on microphones?
No, the frequency response describes the
mic's bandwidth — the usable range between the lowest and highest pitches the mic can capture.
Dynamic range is about the signal amplitude between the mic's (or recorder's) noise floor and their overload level.