Roland JU06A
Roland JU06A
I just bought a Roland GW8 and am slowly learning my way around it. Ill be using it for live gigs and have a question: Is it possible to use the style player and then turn on the song player without having to stop? For example, if I want to jump from a style to a sequenced song or an mp3 song without any pauses, is it possible to do so? Thanks for any help and suggestions.
-
- Guest
Re: Roland JU06A
I'm just trying to remember the last truly great Roland keyboard that stuck in my mind ?
The Jupiter 8 ?
Kong had better luck, M1, Wave Station (AD) Even things like the Triton workstations were cool, and Kong did release the KARP Odyssey Full Size.
Roland have lost there way to a certain extent.
The Jupiter 8 ?
Kong had better luck, M1, Wave Station (AD) Even things like the Triton workstations were cool, and Kong did release the KARP Odyssey Full Size.
Roland have lost there way to a certain extent.
Re: Roland JU06A
Arpangel wrote:Roland have lost there way to a certain extent.
Roland have certainly produced some great devices since the JP8! Let's not forget the Junos (not my personal favourite, but much loved by many), JX (including my beloved MKS-70), JD, JV, XV and even the Integra 7. The JP-80 is a decent performance keyboard, though calling it a 'Jupiter' was, at best. misguided, IMHO.
But Roland do seem to make some odd design decisions. Emulations of classic synths are one thing, but to then package these in tiny boxes, with half the voice allocation of the originals is, to me, very odd. Along came the System 8, with its fabulous synth engine and innovative 'plug-out' concept, but locked inside hardware more suited to a home keyboard.
The Jupiter X seems worth a look, but why take a step back from full ACB for this one when the hardware seems finally worthy of it? And the XM - I don't get it. Yet another mini keyboard and built-in speakers!? Does the world constantly travel backwards and forwards with these things tucked under their arm? I'm unconvinced. If they sell by the bucketload, then good luck to them.
If they didn't sell they wouldn't make them, so somebody's needs are being met - just maybe not yours and mine.
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
Re: Roland JU06A
The Elf wrote:Arpangel wrote:Roland have lost there way to a certain extent.
Roland have certainly produced some great devices since the JP8! Let's not forget the Junos (not my personal favourite, but much loved by many), JX (including my beloved MKS-70), JD, JV, XV and even the Integra 7. The JP-80 is a decent performance keyboard, though calling it a 'Jupiter' was, at best. misguided, IMHO.
But Roland do seem to make some odd design decisions. Emulations of classic synths are one thing, but to then package these in tiny boxes, with half the voice allocation of the originals is, to me, very odd. Along came the System 8, with its fabulous synth engine and innovative 'plug-out' concept, but locked inside hardware more suited to a home keyboard.
The Jupiter X seems worth a look, but why take a step back from full ACB for this one when the hardware seems finally worthy of it? And the XM - I don't get it. Yet another mini keyboard and built-in speakers!? Does the world constantly travel backwards and forwards with these things tucked under their arm? I'm unconvinced. If they sell by the bucketload, then good luck to them.
If they didn't sell they wouldn't make them, so somebody's needs are being met - just maybe not yours and mine.
The question, what does your average pro gigging musician want from a keyabord these days? A good piano/organ sound, some classic synth stuff, and that's about it.
Most manufacturers have got things that cover all that, and most of the stuff that comes with the flagship synths from the major manufacturers probably never, ever gets used.
These types of people are the main marketing area for keyboard products.
I think "people like us" are a minority, and alternative or experimental players who are into exploration and programming aren't the main thrust for Roland etc, we aren't their main income stream, although, at the same time, it could be said, that the majority of sales goes to amateurs, not professionals.
Modular and stuff like that is aimed at us, made by people who's bottom line isn't the balance sheet, we know the amazing range of bizzare and wonderful instruments out there that are available to us, but that's not the Roland or Yamaha market.
Re: Roland JU06A
To some extent - maybe even the greater extent - I wonder if what we are seeing is the difference between the passion of Mr Kakehashi and those now in control of Roland...
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
Re: Roland JU06A
I suspect it's all about market shifts. When a lot of the 'classic' synths came out they cost a fortune. So they were designed and built for serious professionals because they were the only ones who could afford them.
Fast forward a few decades and professional musicians have less money than the amateurs and Behringer are knocking stuff out to the hobby market for £300.
Different audience, different use-case, different design decisions.
Maybe...
Fast forward a few decades and professional musicians have less money than the amateurs and Behringer are knocking stuff out to the hobby market for £300.
Different audience, different use-case, different design decisions.
Maybe...

- Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru -
Posts: 28031 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Contact:
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/
Re: Roland JU06A
very rich hobbyists?
- Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru -
Posts: 28031 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Contact:
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/
Re: Roland JU06A
The Elf wrote:The Jupiter X seems worth a look, but why take a step back from full ACB for this one when the hardware seems finally worthy of it?
What's the step back? I thought it was an improvement on the System 8 (which I thought was a wonderful synth apart from the silly keyboard on it) in that it has the "plugouts" "pluggedin" permanently?
I'm a different sort of curmudgeon though LOL, because: What about those of us who like the weighted controller we have and would rather have desktop modules stacked up nicely on the A stand with it, and not loads of crappy semi-weighted keyboards?
And in defence of Roland: they have the Aerophone. There's a niche product! Brave.
- Tomás Mulcahy
Frequent Poster -
Posts: 2810 Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Cork, Ireland.
Contact:
Re: Roland JU06A
Tomás Mulcahy wrote:The Elf wrote:The Jupiter X seems worth a look, but why take a step back from full ACB for this one when the hardware seems finally worthy of it?
What's the step back? I thought it was an improvement on the System 8
It is a simplified version of the System 8 engine - but uses the processing saved to do more things at one time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
Re: Roland JU06A
I had a quick chat with the Roland reps about the 4-voice limitation of the JU06A (and others in the Boutique range) at Synthfest.
The reason for the 4-voice limit was cited as being the limit of the processor, and to add more voices would require a second processor. Consequently this would mean a larger case and higher price (I can also imagine that it might require more power than a USB connection could provide - just my thoughts, not the rep's).
I can't speak for anyone else, but I would be happy with these consequences...
The reason for the 4-voice limit was cited as being the limit of the processor, and to add more voices would require a second processor. Consequently this would mean a larger case and higher price (I can also imagine that it might require more power than a USB connection could provide - just my thoughts, not the rep's).
I can't speak for anyone else, but I would be happy with these consequences...
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
Re: Roland JU06A
I have always loved Roland products. They have always been innovative yet flawed to a certain degree. My gripes with Roland are more to do with them dropping products after release and not continuing with interesting technologies.
I tried to visit Roland and Korg at the Fest and each time I walked into the demo rooms and saw the products they had created for 8 year old kid fingers I walked straight out. It's a shame because there were some interesting products I wanted to try out.
I tried to visit Roland and Korg at the Fest and each time I walked into the demo rooms and saw the products they had created for 8 year old kid fingers I walked straight out. It's a shame because there were some interesting products I wanted to try out.
Re: Roland JU06A
It has physical buttons to turn the chorus on or off, just before the Delay setting.
..............................mu:zines | music magazine archive | difficultAudio | Legacy Logic Project Conversion
WHY ROLAND WHY????
Roland did a good job on the sound in the JU 06A but they need to produce a 6, 8, 12 or 16 voice version with 61 keys. The look of it is excellent already, just make it bigger. Not sure what arp options it has but it needs to have a random option like the Jupiter 4 and 8 had. I would be a buyer but I cannot buy a tiny 4 voice version.
-
- synthartist69
- Posts: 1 Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2020 12:38 pm
Re: WHY ROLAND WHY????
synthartist69 wrote:Roland did a good job on the sound in the JU 06A but they need to produce a 6, 8, 12 or 16 voice version with 61 keys. The look of it is excellent already, just make it bigger. Not sure what arp options it has but it needs to have a random option like the Jupiter 4 and 8 had. I would be a buyer but I cannot buy a tiny 4 voice version.
+1 - if they had put 2 or three into a similar sized case as the original, with the same controls, I have had one like a shot. But they didn't. And I know that other, more respected synth heads made the same comment and the Roland reps just sighed ...
Veni, Vidi, Aesculi (I came, I saw, I conkered)
Re: WHY ROLAND WHY????
Dave B wrote: +1 - if they had put 2 or three into a similar sized case as the original, with the same controls, I have had one like a shot.
Agreed, and no need for a keyboard either.
This MIDI thing is quite well established, I hear.

Re: WHY ROLAND WHY????
BillB wrote:Dave B wrote: +1 - if they had put 2 or three into a similar sized case as the original, with the same controls, I have had one like a shot.
Agreed, and no need for a keyboard either.
This MIDI thing is quite well established, I hear.
I’m giving up on keyboard synths now, there’s no point, a good 8 octave master keyboard not only opens up new sonic possibilities with some synths, but in the long run, it actually saves space. You don’t need weighted hammer action either, just a normal synth style keyboard, like the M-Audio at under £200 will do fine.