Most people's phones have more storage than that for crying out loud!!!!
It's 2021, how the hell can they justify an iMac now having less storage space than an iMac that shipped in 2009???
Shameful!!!

Blott wrote:So Apple announce a whole new line of iMacs...starting with just 256GB storage - that's an absolute joke!
Most people's phones have more storage than that for crying out loud!!!!
It's 2021, how the hell can they justify an iMac now having less storage space than an iMac that shipped in 2009???
Shameful!!!
Blott wrote:An entry level iMac in 2009 shipped with 500GB.
Blott wrote:A 500GB NVME SSD on Amazon sells for £46, so it'd be buttons for Apple to have started with that (also small) storage as the baseline instead.
Blott wrote:It's poor practice at best, completely unethical at worst IMO.
desmond wrote:Blott wrote:It's poor practice at best, completely unethical at worst IMO.
Not unethical - they make a product and price it as they think the market will bear. And people make product choices accordingly...
desmond wrote:Might have even been a Fusion drive, worst of both worlds.
blinddrew wrote:Actually I think the forced obsolescence strays into the unethical in my view.
Jumpeyspyder wrote:Looks pretty, but seriously horrible for us running mac labs in education
The ethernet is on a wall wart
Blott wrote:Desmond I meant their green practices were unethical, though you'd have a strong argument for their storage practices too. The two are linked.
Blott wrote:The shoulder shrugging apathy and 'that's just the way it is' attitude only serves to ensure that Apple continues this kind of practice.
Blott wrote:At least in 2009 the end user could choose to increase the amount of RAM in future themselves, there's no such luxury for the current iMac.
Blott wrote:To introduce an iMac in 2021 with almost half of the amount of storage of the corresponding model that is TWELVE years older is scandalous.
Blott wrote:Anyway, you clearly don't agree so we'll have to agree to disagree on this one.
Blott wrote:I'm all for Apple making money on upgrades btw, but their products shouldn't offer less than they did over a decade ago, purely to encourage upgrading - especially when there's no way for the user to address this in future, which shortens the lifespan of the product considerably.
Blott wrote:Ethernet is only on the middle model, there's no ethernet at all on the entry level iMac.
Howdy Doody Time wrote:Whether he means it or not, Sheldon paints the best possible picture of the perfect Mac by dismissing issues out of hand, item by item, issues which perplex users to the point of distraction, and even prompt them to invest in Windows equipment out of frustration.
Kwackman wrote:Howdy Doody Time wrote:Whether he means it or not, Sheldon paints the best possible picture of the perfect Mac by dismissing issues out of hand, item by item, issues which perplex users to the point of distraction, and even prompt them to invest in Windows equipment out of frustration.
IMHO that's a mean spirited response to Desmond's help on this forum to Mac users.
Desmond's responses aren't all about "the perfect Mac", go read some of his thoughts on certain Apple laptops.
He responds to the rants on here with reason and (IMHO) integrity, I hope he continues to do so.
blinddrew wrote:desmond wrote:Blott wrote:It's poor practice at best, completely unethical at worst IMO.
Not unethical - they make a product and price it as they think the market will bear. And people make product choices accordingly...
Actually I think the forced obsolescence strays into the unethical in my view.
Hence I don't buy Macs.
Howdy Doody Time wrote: However, every forum probably needs a Sheldon, and a grumpy old git like me.
Howdy Doody Time wrote:This is typical, on this forum historically, goes back years. Someone complains about Apple products, and Sheldon (read Desmond) disects each point and defends it on Apples behalf.
Howdy Doody Time wrote:On the face of it, there is nothing wrong with that, except it does nothing to alleviate the problem if it can't be fixed by a visit to Terminal for example because it is a marketing or design fault, but instead annoys the OP even more.
Howdy Doody Time wrote:The real problem with the Sheldon approach is that it hides or masks genuine difficulties caused by Apple releasing products with unsolved issues. Catalina was a perfect example, and there are others.
Howdy Doody Time wrote:Whether he means it or not, Sheldon paints the best possible picture of the perfect Mac by dismissing issues out of hand, item by item, issues which perplex users to the point of distraction, and even prompt them to invest in Windows equipment out of frustration.
Kennyscrown wrote:I don’t need most of the consumer-centric things they offer, like a 6 speaker surround-sound system in a computer.