Bastl Microgranny.

For fans of synths, pianos, organs or keyboard instruments of any sort.

Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Arpangel »

I just ordered one of these, I’ve been using my 2hp Play a lot lately, but this is going to great for more advanced sampling duties, if you’re into soundscapes, and lo-fi stuff this needs checking out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qbrAfQa6vM
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19820 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Martin Walker »

Nice sounds and features!

Why on earth did they call it the MicroGranny though :lol:

Martin
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 21627 Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:44 am Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Wonks »

Martin Walker wrote:Nice sounds and features!

Why on earth did they call it the MicroGranny though :lol:

Martin

Easy. It's the next step smaller after 'MiniMum'.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 18250 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Reading, UK
Reliably fallible.

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by nathanscribe »

Wonks wrote:It's the next step smaller after 'MiniMum'.

Genius.
User avatar
nathanscribe
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1542 Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:00 am Location: Wakefield, for my sins.
I have no idea what I'm doing.

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Guest »

Microprocessor Granular = MicroGrany?
User avatar
Guest

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Guest »

Or maybe micro=small

Yeah got to be: small granular.
User avatar
Guest

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Martin Walker »

Yes, I can see the derivation makes sense, but I'm afraid the name still puts me right off buying one ;)

Martin
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 21627 Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:44 am Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Arpangel »

Martin Walker wrote:Yes, I can see the derivation makes sense, but I'm afraid the name still puts me right off buying one ;)

Martin

Don’t worry Martin, take consolation that things with silly names can still be amazing, I have to live with my Grandmother so……….

:)
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19820 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by BJG145 »

Martin Walker wrote:I'm afraid the name still puts me right off

Perhaps you'll find room for their forthcoming space-saver, the Nanonanny. :D
User avatar
BJG145
Longtime Poster
Posts: 7722 Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 12:00 am Location: UK

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Martin Walker »

Now that one I could get behind 8-)
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 21627 Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:44 am Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Eddy Deegan »

Is the flagship model called a Maxigramps? ;)
User avatar
Eddy Deegan
Moderator
Posts: 9589 Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:00 am Location: Brighton & Hove, UK
Some of my works | The SOS Forum Album projects | My Jamuary 2025 works

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Arpangel »

First impressions, almost unusable for an old person with even vaguely defective eyesight, knob/button labels unreadable to me without a magnifying glass,
Poor build quality, noisy, even though it’s low bit.
Illogical workflow, no built in speaker, which would have been useful.
On the plus side, it’s got character as they say these days, it’ll suit my music, but it’s uses will be very limited.
Definitely not meant for old impatient musicians with falling eyesight and poor dexterity.
At the price, definitely a bit disappointing.
Others will have different opinions, and I’m not going to send it back, I’ll get used to it, I’m going to immerse myself in it, the only way in these circumstances.
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19820 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Guest »

I have the opinion that the older you get the smaller printed text is.

Updates to my Kindle have also gradually made the text smaller, I used to use font size 2 and now I need 5.

Things used to be so much better.
User avatar
Guest

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

Arpangel wrote:First impressions... knob/button labels unreadable to me without a magnifying glass, Poor build quality, noisy, even though it’s low bit. Illogical workflow, no built in speaker, which would have been useful....

Most points being fairly obvious from the YT video you linked, surely? :headbang:
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 42142 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by John Stafford »

What I love about the Grandmother name is that it doesn't sound like it was chosen by a marketing consultant.

"Any ideas for a name?"

"We've had Slim and Little Phatty. What could be phatter than that?"

"Yo Momma?"

"Don't they make cellos?"

"Let me think..."
John Stafford
Regular
Posts: 161 Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2020 8:51 am Location: Ireland

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Arpangel »

Hugh Robjohns wrote:
Arpangel wrote:First impressions... knob/button labels unreadable to me without a magnifying glass, Poor build quality, noisy, even though it’s low bit. Illogical workflow, no built in speaker, which would have been useful....

Most points being fairly obvious from the YT video you linked, surely? :headbang:

I think like I’m still twenty five, not the age I really am.
"It’ll all be fine, I can cope with that"

:D
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19820 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Arpangel »

I’m making headway, I haven’t a clue what I’m doing yet, but good sounds are coming out, especially sampling my synths through my monitors with the built-in mic, it’s a question of when is too much dirt too much dirt? But it’s fulfilling my expectations, and doing the job I wanted, managing samples in this is like trying to keep a frog in your hand.
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19820 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Martin Walker »

Phew! :thumbup:

Martin
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 21627 Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:44 am Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Arpangel »

Martin Walker wrote:Phew! :thumbup:

Martin

Yes, phew.
You know how you can think something is going to be really great, but it isn’t, well, this is that.
I’m sorry to say I made a mistake getting this, it’s got nothing to do with the sound, it’s more than interesting, it’s the way it works, the file system especially, it’s just too much for my addled brain.
I may keep it, to mess about with, but honestly, it’s a chaotic process, I really don’t know how I’m getting what I’m getting, or where it’s coming from.
It’s a frustrating little thing, I need something just a bit more user friendly, a sampler with a better user interface, but with a similar sound.
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19820 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Martin Walker »

:(
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 21627 Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:44 am Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Arpangel »

Martin Walker wrote::(

I’m giving it more time Martin, I’ve got my Zoom effects unit on it, and I’ve wiped the internal memory of the MG, so it just has my samples in it, wherever they are!
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19820 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Ben Asaro »

Life is too short to spend time putting square pegs into round holes. Shift the MG and move onto something you enjoy more! I have never been into sampling, probably never will be, I guess I enjoy boring bleeps and bloops more!
Ben Asaro
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2888 Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:00 am Location: NYC

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Drongoloid »

Arpangel wrote:First impressions, almost unusable for an old person with even vaguely defective eyesight, knob/button labels unreadable to me without a magnifying glass,
Poor build quality, noisy, even though it’s low bit.
Illogical workflow, no built in speaker, which would have been useful.

Good review. Bought one of these years ago and have never had the first idea about how it works or even to get it to do the same thing twice. Useful once in a while...but yes totally illogical. I did write to them once and got a very polite reply which made the whole process even less logical than it already was. Twiddle knobs get some 'sound'...'sound' never to be found again.
Drongoloid
Poster
Posts: 94 Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 12:00 am Location: P for Elterwater

Re: Bastl Microgranny.

Post by Arpangel »

Drongoloid wrote: Twiddle knobs get some 'sound'...'sound' never to be found again.

But that’s just it, sounds like modular, fifty years ago.
These days, I’m getting much more out of sounds I get from things that aren’t predictable, or that I understand, I’ve got pedals going into pedals, going out to something else, into the four track, out of the four track, the Microgranny, some fantastic low-fin sounds that are truly gut wrenching, but gone forever as soon as I switch it off.
But that’s OK, I’m liking it, I’ve got a folder on my computer called "compost" and I put these sounds in there for future use, and every time I audition one if these sounds, I haven’t a clue how I got it! ir what I used, all I know is that my music is benefiting, it’s still interesting to me, that’s the main thing.
The MG is no different to my modular, in concept, regarding repeatability, or predictability, and I never really know what I’m doing with my modular, it leads me, I don’t lead it.
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19820 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am
Post Reply