Apple M1 chip, yay or ney?

For everything after the recording stage: hardware/software and how you use it.

Moderator: Moderators

Re: Apple M1 chip, yay or ney?

Post by blues_n_cues93 »

As someone who bought an M1 mac mini after optimistically watching some YouTube videos about how it works with Ableton - I can say it's not gone as smooth as I'd hope.

Yes, the Rosetta translation allows me to open Ableton, and nearly all of my plugins (which is an amazing feat - I'll give them that) BUT because these need to be translated to work properly - I am running at 25-30% CPU usage with 2 tracks and no plugins. The front-end load on CPU is high. Which becomes an issue when you add more tracks and plugins, etc.

It DOES do a remarkably good job at NOT driving up CPU the same way my old mac book did, I can add 30 tracks with less CPU heavy plugins and it only goes up to 35%-40% - that being said, if I try and use Izotope or a heavy CPU plugin on each track, it will start overloading around 15 tracks.

It's still better than my old Mac Book, but you will not be able to realize even near the chip's full capabilities unless you're using Mac ONLY software. That is just my experience, but thought I'd share in case it helps!
Last edited by Forum Admin on Wed May 19, 2021 9:46 am, edited 2 times in total.
blues_n_cues93
Posts: 2 Joined: Tue May 18, 2021 7:38 pm

Re: Apple M1 chip, yay or ney?

Post by Humble Bee »

blues_n_cues93 wrote:As someone who bought an M1 mac mini after optimistically watching some YouTube videos about how it works with Ableton - I can say it's not gone as smooth as I'd hope.

Yes, the Rosetta translation allows me to open Ableton, and nearly all of my plugins (which is an amazing feat - I'll give them that) BUT because these need to be translated to work properly - I am running at 25-30% CPU usage with 2 tracks and no plugins. The front-end load on CPU is high. Which becomes an issue when you add more tracks and plugins, etc.

It DOES do a remarkably good job at NOT driving up CPU the same way my old mac book did, I can add 30 tracks with less CPU heavy plugins and it only goes up to 35%-40% - that being said, if I try and use Izotope of a heavy CPU plugin on each track, it will start overloading around 15 tracks.

It's still better than my old Mac Book, but you will not be able to realize even near the chip's full capabilities unless your using Mac ONLY software. That is just my experience, but thought I'd share in case it helps!

I don’t want to be a smart arse but how can you ignore the recommendations from Ableton in this matter?

https://help.ableton.com/hc/en-us/artic ... -with-Live
User avatar
Humble Bee
Regular
Posts: 395 Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:00 am Location: Cloughton Newlands

Re: Apple M1 chip, yay or ney?

Post by Kwackman »

blues_n_cues93 wrote:but you will not be able to realize even near the chip's full capabilities unless your using Mac ONLY software.

When Apple changed from powerPC chips to Intel chips a few years ago, non Apple software companies soon had updated their products to run natively on the then "new" Intel.
I would be surprised if there aren't M1 native versions of the main players available in the near future.
I'm more concerned about when the M1 chip becomes a requirement to run software!
User avatar
Kwackman
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3220 Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 12:00 am Location: Belfast
Cubase, guitars.

Re: Apple M1 chip, yay or ney?

Post by Forum Admin »

blues_n_cues93 wrote:It's still better than my old Mac Book, but you will not be able to realize even near the chip's full capabilities unless you're using Mac ONLY software. That is just my experience, but thought I'd share in case it helps!

Thanks for the feedback, but worth pointing out that this is based on the current status. Ableton will be working on an M1-compatible version of Live, as too will all major DAW makers and mainstream plug-in makers (especially those with CPU-intensive apps, since native M1 should improve performance here significantly).

Just a matter of time... but it would surprise me if most music software has not been updated and is running native within one year. (Sooner we hope.)
User avatar
Forum Admin
Moderator
Posts: 4290 Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 11:00 pm Location: A studio deep in the fenlands of Cambridgeshire, UK
Search 16,966 SOS Reviews+Techniques articles: www.soundonsound.com/search
SOS Podcasts

Re: Apple M1 chip, yay or ney?

Post by fruitcake »

I tried a M1 Mini in the beginning of the year. Digital Performer and Logic with an MOTU 828ES interface. Lots of different plugs. I, too, found that certain plug-ins bogged down the cpu pretty quickly. I’m sure a lot of those have/will be updated fairly quickly. The thing that put me off though was I couldn’t get my MIDI interface to be recognized. No M1 driver. MOTU MIDI express. I could use a USB MIDI controller which may be fine for most or 1 through the 828. But I couldn’t get multiple 5 pin MIDI devices hooked up.
So, for me, I’m waiting for hardware to catch up. And more time to get it working.
User avatar
fruitcake
Regular
Posts: 321 Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 4:32 am Location: Beautiful Downtown Burbank
Here are some Unfinished Sounds. 

Re: Apple M1 chip, yay or ney?

Post by Sam Spoons »

If he's looking at a MacBook I'd say definitely M1, I bought one a few months ago and, while I only use it for general computing (my studio machine is a 2008 MacPro) it is great, light, excellent battery life and a superb display. If he's going Mac at all then M1 has to be the sensible long term choice even if there are a few potholes in the immediate future.
User avatar
Sam Spoons
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19673 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
People often mistake me for a grown-up because of my age.

Re: Apple M1 chip, yay or ney?

Post by Urthlupe »

fruitcake wrote:I tried a M1 Mini in the beginning of the year. Digital Performer and Logic with an MOTU 828ES interface. Lots of different plugs. I, too, found that certain plug-ins bogged down the cpu pretty quickly. I’m sure a lot of those have/will be updated fairly quickly. The thing that put me off though was I couldn’t get my MIDI interface to be recognized. No M1 driver. MOTU MIDI express. I could use a USB MIDI controller which may be fine for most or 1 through the 828. But I couldn’t get multiple 5 pin MIDI devices hooked up.
So, for me, I’m waiting for hardware to catch up. And more time to get it working.

I’d check that’s not the current MOTU problems with Big Sur compatibility rather than a processor issue....

Loopy
User avatar
Urthlupe
Frequent Poster
Posts: 612 Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:00 am Location: West Midlands/Pembrokeshire UK
Post Reply