The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Arrangement, instrumentation, lyric writing, music theory, inspiration… it’s all here.

Moderator: Moderators

The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by Arpangel »

These things are part of all types of music, from pop etc, to contemporary classical and avant-garde, and everything in between.
My theory is that it’s a reflection of of how people feel globally, either trying to introduce a quality that invokes a nostalgic memory, of better times, or, they are used to reflect what’s going on in the world right now, a slow decay, literally, disintegration. I know that’s exactly what I’m using it for in my music, the last thing I want is high fidelity.
"Technical quality" has become unimportant, it’s almost irrelevant to most people, especially younger listeners, all sound, of whatever quality, has become acceptable, it just depends on the context.
You’ve only got to look at some of the instruments that are available now, advertising lo-fi, low bit rate, bit reduction, dirty, anything but pristine and clean.
Where all this is going I don’t know, I like it, it won’t be thought about, like I am now, it’ll just be part of the scene, it already has, it’s interesting though, how things sometimes do a complete u-turn, from wanting ultimate fidelity, and to reproduce acoustic instruments as realistically as possible, to the point we are at now.
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 16802 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by Martin Walker »

Look up 'hauntology' and all will (probably) be explained.

EDIT: This video link will save you the trouble of looking up the term, and is a useful primer: https://www.bbc.co.uk/ideas/videos/what ... s/p0729knv

Oh, and the duo Boards Of Canada are probably the best introduction to the whole genre in the musical sense (I own most of their output on CD): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boards_of_Canada

Martin
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 20688 Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:44 am Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by Drew Stephenson »

I think these things come into and go out of fashion in cycles as new generations discover previous work and are subsequently inspired. Plus there's always the background level of people who have always embraced this kind of sound.
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 24890 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by N i g e l »

Boards of Canada :thumbup:

Allways reminds me of wobbly b&w films at school showing the Rhine all frothy with dead fish, shopping trollys and toxic heavy metals.

Martin Walker wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 7:08 pm This video link will save you the trouble of looking up the term, and is a useful primer: https://www.bbc.co.uk/ideas/videos/what ... s/p0729knv


That included a reference to "look around you" so Im guessing Synthesizer Patel is OK to watch ....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2myFLUDB74

[note: he has done some mods to his Ebay bargain synth ]

----------------

I think its only Hi quality sound that lets us apppreciate "distressing" to its full potential. Maybe its a compare and contrast thing - Lo-fi along side Hi-fi.....
User avatar
N i g e l
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3746 Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 2:40 pm Location: British Isles

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by resistorman »

Distortion has always been a part of music since amplifiers were introduced. I think there's an argument to be made that it's much, much older once resonating bits were added to drums in Africa and more recently to snare drums.
User avatar
resistorman
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2715 Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 12:00 am Location: Asheville NC
"The Best" piece of gear is subjective.

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by Drew Stephenson »

resistorman wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 2:39 am Distortion has always been a part of music since amplifiers were introduced. I think there's an argument to be made that it's much, much older once resonating bits were added to drums in Africa and more recently to snare drums.

Not to mention the over-blowing technique with brass instruments.
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 24890 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by awjoe »

What's the overblowing of brass about?
User avatar
awjoe
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4650 Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:00 am
"The ionion was grown up with a pistol and motor."

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by Favedave »

Brilliant post! As I read it, I thought that most of your post would be used as a newspaper article about rock music in 1971 and be as relevant. Or, if changing some of the adjectives, be about the premiere of Stravinsky's The Rite of Spring in 1913.

I think it's very healthy indeed to "muss up the hair" of the previous generation's sound. Or destroy it altogether. Although what you describe has never really been possible before to this extent since we have SO MUCH recorded music from the last 120 years. And we have the easily available electronic means to alter it in infinite ways.

Can't wait to see where we go!
Favedave
New here
Posts: 8 Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2021 9:42 am
"ARS LONGA, VITA BREVIS" Producer, Tabitha Rasa Project @ tabitharasa.com
- iMac Pro w/ 64 gigs RAM, Apollo Twin, UAD Satellite x 2, w/ 95 plugins, Logic Pro, Luna, & Adobe CC.
- JBL 4328 Monitors; Omnisphere; Kontakt; Speakerphone; Melodyne; Altiverb, etc.

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by Arpangel »

Favedave wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 7:02 am Brilliant post! As I read it, I thought that most of your post would be used as a newspaper article about rock music in 1971 and be as relevant. Or, if changing some of the adjectives, be about the premiere of Stravinsky's The Rite of Spring in 1913.

I think it's very healthy indeed to "muss up the hair" of the previous generation's sound. Or destroy it altogether. Although what you describe has never really been possible before to this extent since we have SO MUCH recorded music from the last 120 years. And we have the easily available electronic means to alter it in infinite ways.

Can't wait to see where we go!

Interesting comments.

Martin, BOC, when I first bought Tomorrow’s Harvest, it changed the very atmosphere, the chemical make-up of the air in my room, it was transcendental, you were immediately in another place, it was so evocative, of what? I’ll tell you, of everything, it was like a film running from the past showing me my whole life, Stars Of The Lid also have this affect on me, I say when people ask me if I’ve taken Acid, "no, but I’ve seen Stars Of The Lid"
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 16802 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by Drew Stephenson »

awjoe wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 5:22 am What's the overblowing of brass about?

Paragraph 3 ;)
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 24890 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by Martin Walker »

Arpangel wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 8:28 am Stars Of The Lid also have this affect on me, I say when people ask me if I’ve taken Acid, "no, but I’ve seen Stars Of The Lid"

Hi Tony,

Thanks for introducing me to Stars Of The Lid!

With claimed influences including Arvo Pärt, Henryk Górecki, and Brian Eno, it's hardly surprising that I love what I'm hearing 8-)

Looks like I'll be purchasing 'and their Refinement of the Decline' in short order.

Martin
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 20688 Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:44 am Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by Drew Stephenson »

blinddrew wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 11:37 am
awjoe wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 5:22 am What's the overblowing of brass about?

Paragraph 3 ;)

And this time with the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overblowi ... 0a%20slide.
:headbang::headbang::headbang:
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 24890 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by TomChimera »

Hi, I think there are few elements to it.

As I understand there is a need of animals including humans to become part of their environment, to grow new neurological connections, and to change physically.
I even heard from a singing teacher that the Diaphragm changes as a reaction to the soundscape one is immersed in, like if you are in a city or nature..
Like birds imitating their soundscape.
And these sounds existed for a long time around us.

Many people associate it with certain feelings, experiences, times in their life, etc..
It part of musical reification, like when you hear a song from a film you liked and the emotion is triggered. Few years ago I read research about it from neurology perspective.

There is also the Idea of having more choices in the painter's color palette.
Difference create contrast and this brings engagement and interest.
Many of us desire difference and contrasts in various forms, this brings another form to the palette.

Tom
TomChimera
Poster
Posts: 87 Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 5:38 am

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by Drongoloid »

Also interesting to consider what might be a parallel in other creative concerns like film, photography or painting. What is the equivelent of lo-fi 8-bit glitching in the world of fiction (writing)?
Drongoloid
Poster
Posts: 94 Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 12:00 am Location: P for Elterwater

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by BWC »

Drongoloid wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 7:34 pm What is the equivelent of lo-fi 8-bit glitching in the world of fiction (writing)?

Perhaps when a character is stressed in a way that their dialog sporadically regresses to childlike?
BWC
Frequent Poster
Posts: 615 Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 9:12 am Location: FL, US
BWC

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by RichardT »

The great thing about producing music now is that we have all these wonderful processing tools available to us with a few clicks. Plus now we have free (or nearly free) access to all the world’s music of the last few hundred years as well. And we can collaborate easily with musicians around the globe.

I expect all this will usher in a time of great creativity. Now we can create fusions not just across genres but also across eras!

Added to which in a few years we will have usable AI assistants.
RichardT
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4274 Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 12:00 am Location: Ireland

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by Martin Walker »

Drongoloid wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 7:34 pm Also interesting to consider what might be a parallel in other creative concerns like film, photography or painting.

Well a classic interpretation of hauntology in painting must be
Roy Lichtenstein:

Image

One for film is surely Sin City with its greatly reduced dynamic colour range:

Image

Martin
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 20688 Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:44 am Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by Drew Stephenson »

And in photography you've got all your 'vintage' filters or deliberate use of high ISO for visible grain.
And in literature I guess you've got things like A Void by Georges Perec or A Girl Is A Half-formed Thing by Eimear McBride.
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 24890 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by Arpangel »

Drongoloid wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 7:34 pm Also interesting to consider what might be a parallel in other creative concerns like film, photography or painting. What is the equivelent of lo-fi 8-bit glitching in the world of fiction (writing)?

I’m not sure you can, some things you just can’t make an analogy with.
John Cage, Mesostics, maybe?

Martin, if Stars Of The Lid ever tour again, you have to see them, I’m not going to even begin to describe how incredible they are live, if you think the "music" is good and you haven’t even seen them yet :shocked:
In terms of live shows, they aren’t on the cutting edge, they’ve gone way beyond it and fallen right over.
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 16802 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: The popularity of distressing, disintegrating sound.

Post by BigRedX »

IMO in music "LoFi" only really becomes a thing once "HiFi" is easily available to anyone who wants it.

Right up until the mid 90s almost everything I did could be termed "LoFi" because that was simply all the technology I could afford a the time for creating, playing and recording music could achieve. On the few occasions that we went into a "proper" recording studio, financial constraints meant that either it was only a slight step up in quality or we simply couldn't afford the time to really do the songs(s) recorded justice. A lot of the time a "good" take was one in which all of the band got all the way through the song without producing any glaring errors. And then of course the results were released to the pubic on compact cassette or budget vinyl pressings.

I think it is unsurprising that once "perfect" sound reproduction is the norm, that people look to add some "dirt" back into the proceedings. However it is very much select dirt and while it might not sound like it to most listeners you can bet that the artist producing it has carefully tweaked the dirt to exactly their requirements. It's very rarely uncontrollable dirt produced because the instruments or recording process are incapable of anything else.
User avatar
BigRedX
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2313 Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:00 am
RockinRollin' VampireMan
Post Reply