neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Customising, building or repairing your own gear? Need help with acoustic treatment or soundproofing? Ask away…

Moderator: Moderators

neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by AdiT »

Why the manufacturers of speakers/loudspeakers have not switched to production of speaker with neodymium magnets (especially, those for low freq). In the past two years, are producers who have won several international awards, some even innovation awards, with speakers that use ferrite magnets.

I know there are manufacturers who use neodymium magnet but represent a small percentage.
User avatar
AdiT
Regular
Posts: 297 Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:00 am

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

If ferrite can generate the required flux density within acceptable size and weight constraints, why go to the expense of neodymium?

H
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 38978 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by shufflebeat »

While we're at it, can we agree a pronunciation?

...of the N word, that is.
shufflebeat
Longtime Poster
Posts: 9101 Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:00 am Location: Manchester, UK
“…I can tell you I don't have money, but what I do have are a very particular set of skills. Skills I have acquired over a very long career” - (folk musician, Manchester).

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

neo·dym·i·um \ˌnē-ō-ˈdi-mē-əm\
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 38978 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by Logarhythm »

Hugh Robjohns wrote:If ferrite can generate the required flux density within acceptable size and weight constraints, why go to the expense of neodymium?

It makes a huge difference to the sound... of marketing communications ;)
Logarhythm
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1093 Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:00 am Location: On an intergalactic voyage to collect fresh electrons

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by shufflebeat »

Hugh Robjohns wrote:neo·dym·i·um \ˌnē-ō-ˈdi-mē-əm\

Ta.
shufflebeat
Longtime Poster
Posts: 9101 Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:00 am Location: Manchester, UK
“…I can tell you I don't have money, but what I do have are a very particular set of skills. Skills I have acquired over a very long career” - (folk musician, Manchester).

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by Folderol »

Logarhythm wrote:
Hugh Robjohns wrote:If ferrite can generate the required flux density within acceptable size and weight constraints, why go to the expense of neodymium?

It makes a huge difference to the sound... of marketing communications ;)

It also makes a huge difference to the manufacturers bank balance.. coincidentally, yours too in the opposite direction.
User avatar
Folderol
Jedi Poster
Posts: 18179 Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:00 am Location: The Mudway Towns, UK
Yes. I am that Linux nut {apparently now an 'elderly'}
Onwards and... err... sideways!

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by IvanSC »

I can lift my 2x10 bass speaker box with one hand since I swapped the original ones for Celestion neos.

Same reason I have swapped out a lot of my gear. Size and weight.
User avatar
IvanSC
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3041 Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:00 am Location: UK France & USA depending on the time of year.
Two bottles of Corona lemon and lime,  please!

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by Folderol »

IvanSC wrote:I can lift my 2x10 bass speaker box with one hand since I swapped the original ones for Celestion neos.

Same reason I have swapped out a lot of my gear. Size and weight.

It makes a huge difference to your general fitness, as you don't get so much exercise :tongue:
User avatar
Folderol
Jedi Poster
Posts: 18179 Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:00 am Location: The Mudway Towns, UK
Yes. I am that Linux nut {apparently now an 'elderly'}
Onwards and... err... sideways!

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by AdiT »

IvanSC wrote:I can lift my 2x10 bass speaker box with one hand since I swapped the original ones for Celestion neos.

Same reason I have swapped out a lot of my gear. Size and weight.

if we talk about weight, IMO line array systems used for mobile scene, have the most benefit from neodymium
User avatar
AdiT
Regular
Posts: 297 Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:00 am

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by BigRedX »

The main market for Neodymium loudspeakers are musicians who gig regularly and have to move their own gear without the benefit of a road crew. So full-range powered PA cabs and bass cabs are where all the innovations are being made and where you'll find people being enthusiastic about the technology.

It's not really an issue with permanent installations like studios, or bands who are successful enough to be able to employ people to move all their heavy speaker cabs about for them.

Also remember that neodymium speakers are not simply conventional ones with lighter magnets. As soon as the chassis no longer has to support the weight of traditional magnets, the designers have a lot more scope for saving even more weight and improving the performance of the speaker. This means that that neodymium based speakers are never going to sound the same as "traditional" ones. And as we all know in the field of audio, what is technically better is not always as pleasing to the human ear that has years of being attuned to a certain type of sound.
User avatar
BigRedX
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2273 Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 12:00 am
RockinRollin' VampireMan

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by AdiT »

Image

If we take the speaker "A" and turns into a speaker with neodymium magnet "B" the only possible change that I see is some holes marked in red.
If you reduce the size of the chassis, will start to vibrate.

What other changes do you think are possible, to make it sound different?
User avatar
AdiT
Regular
Posts: 297 Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:00 am

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by IvanSC »

Chassis does not necessarily have to be made of sheet material.
A cast spider-style chassis would still be rigid enough without having to support the weight of a large magnet.
This has already been done many times in the past to very good effect.

In the early 60's my bass cabinet had a 22" speaker out of a juke box, which had a rigid spider fame made of cast aluminium.
Mind you it DID break pretty easily when I dropped it down a flight of concrete stairs leaving a gig! :lol:

I replaced it with two huge 1x18" Goodmans Audiom 90 reflex boxes! 50 watts handling capacity each!
Powered by a converted mono valve hifi amp made by (local company) Phillips. About 1963/4
User avatar
IvanSC
Frequent Poster
Posts: 3041 Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:00 am Location: UK France & USA depending on the time of year.
Two bottles of Corona lemon and lime,  please!

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by AdiT »

I agree that "Chassis does not necessarily have to be made of sheet material."

But chassis has a dual role.

Besides the support of the magnet which is very obviously, has one that is "hidden" must maintain the distance between the the voice coil, top plate and the bottom plate core. This distance must be as small as possible for high efficiency, so it is not possible for the chassis to vibrate neither 1 mm / 0.039 inch even at max output, because it would damage the coil and an variable magnetic flux would have negative consequences.

Image
User avatar
AdiT
Regular
Posts: 297 Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:00 am

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by Wonks »

But it doesn't take much to make a rigid frame to support a lightweight magnet. The forces involved aren't huge. Don't forget that most cones are made from paper and they don't break down under the forces involved. The same finger push that can poke a hole in the parer cone will only distort a sold chassis by a few microns.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 17020 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Reading, UK
Reliably fallible.

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by ef37a »

My experience of the neo speaker has been limited to the Celestion Century and the feedback I read in forums from guitarists.
It is generally tolerated but not raved about, but then there are those that don't like anything that is not a V30!

The problem is always the cost. A brief varder found the Neo at £112 and the V30 at £77 and of course that gets to serious wonga for a 4x`12! Mind you the weight saving for multiples is significant. The Century is also a couple of dB less sensitive than the 30 but I can't help feeing that if the V30 and neo were comparable in price folks would take to the lightweight speaker better?

A very personal and unscientific observation..The Blackstar S1 45 combo was for a long time loaded with two Centuries. You know in all my time at Bs I never had a punter say "these speakers are ***t!" Sadly the cost has now become prohibitive and the combo is loaded with V30s and is consequently now almost as much of a brute to shift as the A30 combo.

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 16517 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk
#They did not listen, they are not listening still...Perhaps they never will?#

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by Wonks »

I had an S1 45 with the Centuries (and even that was a brute to shift). But I didn't like the speakers much as there seemed to be very little bottom end from them. My 10" HT5 put out more bass. Not sure if that was due to the cab, speakers or a combination of both. I was contemplating swapping the speakers out for V30s or similar, but the thought of even more weight put me right off that idea.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 17020 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Reading, UK
Reliably fallible.

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by ef37a »

Wonks wrote:I had an S1 45 with the Centuries (and even that was a brute to shift). But I didn't like the speakers much as there seemed to be very little bottom end from them. My 10" HT5 put out more bass. Not sure if that was due to the cab, speakers or a combination of both. I was contemplating swapping the speakers out for V30s or similar, but the thought of even more weight put me right off that idea.

Loss of LF, a "thin" sound is the most common reaction on forums to the Century but it is hard to know if that is a psychological effect? "Light speaker. Light sound" or a real one. Your experience Wonks tends to suggest it is a real quality. One is paused to wonder why Celestion did not just produce a low weight "copy" of the V30? Maybe some technical reason?

The S1 45 cab is about the same size as the A30 and the Stage 60 (that is a BEAST!)so no change there. I take it you no longer have the 45 Wonks? It would have been interesting for you to try it into another speaker. At a pinch and with care over levels the G10N-40 in the HT 5 would have coped!

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 16517 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk
#They did not listen, they are not listening still...Perhaps they never will?#

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by Wonks »

I've only just sold it as it was sitting around doing nothing except taking up space. Had it up and running shortly before that to check that it sounded like I remembered, and it did.

Certainly when compared to the Fender HR Deluxe I had at the time (with an alnico Jensen speaker) when I bought the S1 45, the Fender had a lot more bass and turning the bass up and the ISF to full Brit mode made very little difference.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 17020 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Reading, UK
Reliably fallible.

Re: neodymium vs ferrite magnets in loudspeakers

Post by AdiT »

"The forces involved aren't huge."

Aren't ?

I give you two simple examples:
why in a club the clothes are shaking on you ?
why when you play at max volume a medium HI-FI sistem at home the furniture and the things on it are shaking ?

" Don't forget that most cones are made from paper and they don't break down under the forces involved."

because they are "stopped" only by the force of the spider and surround.

"The same finger push that can poke a hole in the parer cone will only distort a sold chassis by a few microns. "

the voice coil is "protected" by the spider and the surround which makes parts remain concentric in a stable frame.
User avatar
AdiT
Regular
Posts: 297 Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:00 am
Post Reply