
Orchestral reverb spacing
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Orchestral reverb spacing
Me too
(though acoustic jazz/folk bands rather than orchestras) but I think the OP is trying to construct a realistic sounding orchestra recording from samples/VSTi's.

- Sam Spoons
Jedi Poster - Posts: 18708 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
Your karma has run over my dogma
Re: Orchestral reverb spacing
Sam Spoons wrote:Percussion at back, long delay, strings at front short or no delay.
Assuming we're talking the delay on the reverb, nope.
Percussion at the back means that the sound has a short distance to travel before hitting the back wall and therefore the reflected sound arrives quicker than the reflected sound from the strings, which has a greater distance to travel (hence a longer pre-delay).
- Drew Stephenson
Jedi Poster -
Posts: 23151 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Contact:
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I still have no idea what I'm doing...
Ignore the post count, I still have no idea what I'm doing...
Re: Orchestral reverb spacing
That makes sense
- Sam Spoons
Jedi Poster - Posts: 18708 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
Your karma has run over my dogma
Re: Orchestral reverb spacing
jimjazzdad wrote: an MS pair or maybe spaced omnis - and add a bit of Bricasti dust on the stereo bus as required. A well placed coincident pair will always give a more realistic image with depth than any amount of hocus pocus in post... (just my humble opinion; carry on!)
Of course if you have a spare orchestra and room to play them in, the well placed coincident pair will do just perfectly... But this is really about trying to make virtual (sampled) instruments sound like they are in a real space and arranged realistically.
Stu.
-
- Moroccomoose
Regular - Posts: 453 Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:00 am Location: Leicester
Re: Orchestral reverb spacing
Wonks wrote:Sam Spoons wrote:That makes sense
Drew starts to doubt himself....
Never stopped!

- Drew Stephenson
Jedi Poster -
Posts: 23151 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Contact:
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I still have no idea what I'm doing...
Ignore the post count, I still have no idea what I'm doing...
Re: Orchestral reverb spacing
blinddrew wrote:Sam Spoons wrote:Percussion at back, long delay, strings at front short or no delay.
Assuming we're talking the delay on the reverb, nope.
Percussion at the back means that the sound has a short distance to travel before hitting the back wall and therefore the reflected sound arrives quicker than the reflected sound from the strings, which has a greater distance to travel (hence a longer pre-delay).
Of course, for the full effect you also need to account for the wall behind the audience too and the delay situation would be more or less opposite but possibly at a lower level (yes, I know that's probably over-complicating it)
- Rich Hanson
Frequent Poster (Level2) - Posts: 3104 Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 12:00 am Location: Sort of near Rochester, Kent, UK
Re: Orchestral reverb spacing
Moroccomoose wrote:Of course if you have a spare orchestra and room to play them in, the well placed coincident pair will do just perfectly... But this is really about trying to make virtual (sampled) instruments sound like they are in a real space and arranged realistically.
Stu.
Sorry. I must have been asleep in mastering class when they handed out the assignment.

- jimjazzdad
Regular - Posts: 186 Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 12:00 am
Halifax, NS, CANADA
Re: Orchestral reverb spacing
Ok I finally had time to give it a try in Logic. First attempt set up correctly but didn’t really work for my ears until I put the sends all to pre-fader. Then I could lower the initial sound but keep the reverb high. Perhaps this is cheat way to lose the initial bright attack of instruments at the back, rather than eq them. I was only working with 1 short repeated piano note. I know strings, horns and other slower attack sounds may not need a pre-fader approach.
I’ll keep working with it.
The other issue is the one mentioned previously about how the further the reverb source is the more mono it is, or is it the instrument that becomes more mono? I better re-read!
I’ll keep working with it.
The other issue is the one mentioned previously about how the further the reverb source is the more mono it is, or is it the instrument that becomes more mono? I better re-read!
- ManFromGlass
Jedi Poster - Posts: 6318 Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:00 am Location: O Canada