Cabling for AES50 (X32 - DL32)
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Cabling for AES50 (X32 - DL32)
Yes, definitely good advice. CAT5 Ethercons can be used with CAT6 cable but a ready made cable would normally be supplied with the associated connectors. And there are well documented problems with when the screen is not continuous between the two devices.
- Sam Spoons
Jedi Poster - Posts: 17866 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
Your karma has run over my dogma
Re: Cabling for AES50 (X32 - DL32)
Yes - although shielded cable is used this does not necessarily mean that the shield is connected to the shell of the etherCon connector.
The Neutrix NE8MX cable connector carrier converts a pre-assembled RJ45 to an etherCon Cat5E/Cat6E connector. At https://www.neutrik.com/en/product/ne8mx there is a download that lists the RJ45 connectors from different suppliers that are compatible with the NE8MX, together with information on whether these RJ45 connectors are for shielded cable (or not), plus the CAT of cable that the RJ45 connectors are compatible with. It is possible for a shielded cable to be used with a RJ45 not designed to be used with a shield, resulting in the cable shield not being connected to the shell of the etherCon connector.
The Neutrix NE8MX cable connector carrier converts a pre-assembled RJ45 to an etherCon Cat5E/Cat6E connector. At https://www.neutrik.com/en/product/ne8mx there is a download that lists the RJ45 connectors from different suppliers that are compatible with the NE8MX, together with information on whether these RJ45 connectors are for shielded cable (or not), plus the CAT of cable that the RJ45 connectors are compatible with. It is possible for a shielded cable to be used with a RJ45 not designed to be used with a shield, resulting in the cable shield not being connected to the shell of the etherCon connector.
Re: Cabling for AES50 (X32 - DL32)
Yes, true, as you said, the spec for the X32 AES50 require that the screens be connected to the Ethercon shell at both ends.
- Sam Spoons
Jedi Poster - Posts: 17866 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
Your karma has run over my dogma
Re: Cabling for AES50 (X32 - DL32)
Cable didn't arrive in time for the gig, so I had to use an off-the-shelf 2m CAT5e cable from PC World.
It worked, but obviously not a long distance, so I racked it all into the same rack and used good old analogue stage boxes.
Proper cable has just arrived so will check those things out!
Thank you all!
It worked, but obviously not a long distance, so I racked it all into the same rack and used good old analogue stage boxes.
Proper cable has just arrived so will check those things out!
Thank you all!
- Dave Rowles
Frequent Poster -
Posts: 1365 Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:00 am
Location: Isle of Man
Contact:
http://www.manninmusic.com Teacher - Isle of Man
http://www.manninmusic.shop Music Shop - Isle of Man
https://www.facebook.com/mannin.sound - PA Hire/Sound Engineer - Isle of Man
http://www.manninmusic.shop Music Shop - Isle of Man
https://www.facebook.com/mannin.sound - PA Hire/Sound Engineer - Isle of Man
Re: Cabling for AES50 (X32 - DL32)
I wouldn't use any ethernet cable in a live situation unless it was extra rugged and sported proper Ethercon connectors by a reputable brand. Anything else is fine for one off emergency situations, but don't expect it to last in continuous usage especially in a rig that is repeatedly set up and knocked down.
IMO all consumer/office grade computer components are simply not robust enough for the demands gigging puts on them. Ethernet cables in particular are set and forget, and in those circumstances they work perfectly well. Just don't expect ordinary ones to still be working and making reliable connections after a month or two of weekly gigging.
Speaking from personal experience.
IMO all consumer/office grade computer components are simply not robust enough for the demands gigging puts on them. Ethernet cables in particular are set and forget, and in those circumstances they work perfectly well. Just don't expect ordinary ones to still be working and making reliable connections after a month or two of weekly gigging.
Speaking from personal experience.
RockinRollin' VampireMan
Re: Cabling for AES50 (X32 - DL32)
Not the same thing I know, but for our permanent install at our church, we’ve been running an A&H AR2412 to our SQ5 with shielded cat 6 off a drum I bought from screwfix with standard RJ45 plugs. And it has worked perfectly.
I wouldn’t do that for a portable solution, but for an installation, it seems fine.
I wouldn’t do that for a portable solution, but for an installation, it seems fine.
Re: Cabling for AES50 (X32 - DL32)
The plain truth is that dSnake over AES50 is one of the massive benefits that A&H's SQ series has over X32. *Way* more resilient and forgiving of cables.
Re: Cabling for AES50 (X32 - DL32)
MarkOne wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 5:51 pm Not the same thing I know, but for our permanent install at our church, we’ve been running an A&H AR2412 to our SQ5 with shielded cat 6 off a drum I bought from screwfix with standard RJ45 plugs. And it has worked perfectly.
I wouldn’t do that for a portable solution, but for an installation, it seems fine.
Exactly. "Set and forget" just like network connections on desktop computers in the office. They work fine for years because they never get touched. On the other hand when I was in charge of such things the RJ45 connectors on cables attached to laptops used to need replacing every 6 months or so, because the locking tag would eventually break off and they would loose connection at a critical moment. I used to have to tell users with laptops to let me know the moment their RJ45 plug broke so I could replace the cable straight away and not when a large file transfer stalled mid way through.
RockinRollin' VampireMan