3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
Moderator: Moderators
3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
Hello, Y'all!
I hope everyone is doing great!
A quick question for the experts here. I am going to put the new X32 into our rack. The X32 XLR ports are all out the back and I would like to put a patch panel under it and route the XLRs to the front of the rack. This means connecting 15 channels.
For context, the rack is a 12U rack with X32, DI, IEMs, Power Conditioner, rack mounted PC and WIFI.
2 Options:
A) XLR to XLR Individual Patch Cables (3ft)- Example: Any good XLR cable
B) XLR to XLR Snake (3ft)- Example: Hosa XLR-802
The patch cables are shielded better. I assume this is not too relevant at this short length, but then again, there are a lot of power cords and electronic doodads in the back that may cause interference.
The short snake takes up way less space and therefore allows for more airflow in the rack (which could be a benefit), but maybe not as shielded?
I would like to go the snake route as it will probably be cleaner with less clutter, but am a little concerned about the possible loss of audio quality.
Anything I am missing or any good advice on this?
Thank you!
Oliver
I hope everyone is doing great!
A quick question for the experts here. I am going to put the new X32 into our rack. The X32 XLR ports are all out the back and I would like to put a patch panel under it and route the XLRs to the front of the rack. This means connecting 15 channels.
For context, the rack is a 12U rack with X32, DI, IEMs, Power Conditioner, rack mounted PC and WIFI.
2 Options:
A) XLR to XLR Individual Patch Cables (3ft)- Example: Any good XLR cable
B) XLR to XLR Snake (3ft)- Example: Hosa XLR-802
The patch cables are shielded better. I assume this is not too relevant at this short length, but then again, there are a lot of power cords and electronic doodads in the back that may cause interference.
The short snake takes up way less space and therefore allows for more airflow in the rack (which could be a benefit), but maybe not as shielded?
I would like to go the snake route as it will probably be cleaner with less clutter, but am a little concerned about the possible loss of audio quality.
Anything I am missing or any good advice on this?
Thank you!
Oliver
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
There's no reason why a snake should be less well screened, but obviously there are good quality and bad quality snakes, just as there good and bad individual cables.
But a three foot snake is going to be a tricky find...
Personally, I'd buy a suitable length of muliticore and wire it up myself to optimise the individual cable lengths to each socket and make the rack as neat as possible.
But a three foot snake is going to be a tricky find...
Personally, I'd buy a suitable length of muliticore and wire it up myself to optimise the individual cable lengths to each socket and make the rack as neat as possible.
- Hugh Robjohns
Moderator -
Posts: 39007 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual...
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
I guess the advantage of using individual cables is that if a cable does go off for any reason you can replace it individually. But if this is to be a semi-permanent set-up then it's unlikely that you'll have that kind of failure, and you can always carry a couple of 1m XLR cables spare as emergency patches.
- Drew Stephenson
Forum Aficionado -
Posts: 24612 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Contact:
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I still have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/
Ignore the post count, I still have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
I'm not sure that you'll find a 3ft loom but here's a 6ft loom
https://cpc.farnell.com/pro-signal/psg0 ... xlr%20loom
It appears to use the same cable as the D-Sub looms that I use which are foil screened so there should be no problem with interference. I'd better add that I've not used those connectors though.
https://cpc.farnell.com/pro-signal/psg0 ... xlr%20loom
It appears to use the same cable as the D-Sub looms that I use which are foil screened so there should be no problem with interference. I'd better add that I've not used those connectors though.
- James Perrett
Moderator -
Posts: 14368 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am
Location: The wilds of Hampshire
Contact:
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
As you’ll have at least one foot of unloomed cable at each end of a 3’ loom, I really don’t think a 3’ loom would be practical or beneficial. And a longer loom means you have to find space for the extra length of cables.
Personally I’d go individual cables, tied in bunches of say 4 cables to keep things neat so that the length of the loose ends can be kept to a minimum.
I’m quite taken with wiring harness loom tape as it’s gentler on the cable than plastic cable ties and cheaper than velcro.
Don’t forget to mark up each end of the cable so you can remove and replace if necessary with ease.
Personally I’d go individual cables, tied in bunches of say 4 cables to keep things neat so that the length of the loose ends can be kept to a minimum.
I’m quite taken with wiring harness loom tape as it’s gentler on the cable than plastic cable ties and cheaper than velcro.
Don’t forget to mark up each end of the cable so you can remove and replace if necessary with ease.
Reliably fallible.
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
I’ve got some 3mm foil screened, it’s so small, you can bunch them up and hardly know they are there, strap them to the sides of your rack.
As Wonks said, a three foot loom just isn’t worth it, but the above isn’t a ready made solution, you’d have to make the leads yourself.
As Wonks said, a three foot loom just isn’t worth it, but the above isn’t a ready made solution, you’d have to make the leads yourself.
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
James Perrett wrote: ↑Sun May 15, 2022 10:59 pm I'm not sure that you'll find a 3ft loom but here's a 6ft loom
https://cpc.farnell.com/pro-signal/psg0 ... xlr%20loom
It appears to use the same cable as the D-Sub looms that I use which are foil screened so there should be no problem with interference. I'd better add that I've not used those connectors though.
Those look nice, but are not available in the US as far as I can tell....
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
blinddrew wrote: ↑Sun May 15, 2022 10:30 pm I guess the advantage of using individual cables is that if a cable does go off for any reason you can replace it individually. But if this is to be a semi-permanent set-up then it's unlikely that you'll have that kind of failure, and you can always carry a couple of 1m XLR cables spare as emergency patches.
Yes, I weighed that against space savings. The Monoprice 4-channel loom is inexpensive enough that I can buy one extra- just in case and still have less clutter..
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
Wonks wrote: ↑Mon May 16, 2022 8:25 am As you’ll have at least one foot of unloomed cable at each end of a 3’ loom, I really don’t think a 3’ loom would be practical or beneficial. And a longer loom means you have to find space for the extra length of cables.
Personally I’d go individual cables, tied in bunches of say 4 cables to keep things neat so that the length of the loose ends can be kept to a minimum.
I’m quite taken with wiring harness loom tape as it’s gentler on the cable than plastic cable ties and cheaper than velcro.
Don’t forget to mark up each end of the cable so you can remove and replace if necessary with ease.
Good points! Thank you
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
At the risk of talking to myself here , this was my final decision (maybe it helps someone down the road):
I returned the Monoprice 3ft snake I was originally set on. I am sure they are fine cables, but there were two reasons:
First, having individual cables will allow me to more easily swap a single cable, should one fail (thank you @blinddrew).
Second, the 3ft snake has inherently 1ft of unloomed strands on both sides. The distance that I am dealing with is only 2ft (if that much) to begin with, so it was indeed kind of pointless to use a snake (thank you @Wonks).
I will share pictures once I finish wrapping/organizing the 24 cables in the back of the rack
Best,
Oliver
I returned the Monoprice 3ft snake I was originally set on. I am sure they are fine cables, but there were two reasons:
First, having individual cables will allow me to more easily swap a single cable, should one fail (thank you @blinddrew).
Second, the 3ft snake has inherently 1ft of unloomed strands on both sides. The distance that I am dealing with is only 2ft (if that much) to begin with, so it was indeed kind of pointless to use a snake (thank you @Wonks).
I will share pictures once I finish wrapping/organizing the 24 cables in the back of the rack
Best,
Oliver
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
The colour coding is a good approach as well.
- Drew Stephenson
Forum Aficionado -
Posts: 24612 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Contact:
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I still have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/
Ignore the post count, I still have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
Yes, very neat.
There's no way that I'm going to be posting pics of the rat's nest of cables behind my rack any time soon.
There's no way that I'm going to be posting pics of the rat's nest of cables behind my rack any time soon.
- Music Wolf
Frequent Poster -
Posts: 2755 Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:00 am
Location: Exiled to St Helens
Contact:
No One There
https://www.starbelly.me/
https://www.starbelly.me/
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
Music Wolf wrote: ↑Wed May 25, 2022 4:34 pm Yes, very neat.
There's no way that I'm going to be posting pics of the rat's nest of cables behind my rack any time soon.
Yea, we will see how long this is going to last.....
Its like cleaning up the garage......Looks great for about a week...
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
You can keep it tidy for a whole week! I'm lucky if it lasts a day. I'm just off to start moving stuff around again so I can return the PA back to it's corner after last weekend's gig (I don't know when the next one will be but I am, technically, retired...).
WRT wiring, your's does look very neat maybe I'll be inspired to tidy my studio desk wiring while the X32 is still in it's gigbag.
WRT wiring, your's does look very neat maybe I'll be inspired to tidy my studio desk wiring while the X32 is still in it's gigbag.
- Sam Spoons
Jedi Poster - Posts: 19719 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
People often mistake me for a grown-up because of my age.
Re: 3ft Patch vs Snake Cable
blinddrew wrote: ↑Sun May 15, 2022 10:30 pm I guess the advantage of using individual cables is that if a cable does go off for any reason you can replace it individually. But if this is to be a semi-permanent set-up then it's unlikely that you'll have that kind of failure, and you can always carry a couple of 1m XLR cables spare as emergency patches.
********************
I like this solution.
Makes sense.
Rene
-
- Rene Asologuitar
Poster - Posts: 76 Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2022 5:06 am