?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

For everything after the recording stage: hardware/software and how you use it.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply

?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by Mixedup »

Hi All.

This is for dialogue only.

I'm doing breath reduction with manual edits. I have got that process down to a single swipe-click in Reaper. That moves the breath to an adjacent track, which gives me loads of control in terms of setting levels, adjusting fades, truncating v long breaths, rolling off top end etc. V happy with the results, and it's pretty quick with practice — it's easy to spot breath waveforms and to do edits as I play through.

I'd save a hell of a lot of time and effort if I could find an app/plug-in that can attenuate breaths reliably, though! Thing is, I haven't yet found one I'm happy with. RX10, Accusonus ERA, Waves, Descript... they're all *nearly* there. About 85% maybe. But they all throw up enough errors, whether in terms of damage to wanted sounds or missing occasional breaths, that they don't really end up saving me time, and I have less co trol over the results. It's particularly the case when working with already compressed/bandwidth restricted sounds captured over VOIP or phone.

Not sure if this is a case of the workman needing more practice or the tools not quite meeting my standards of acceptability!

Does anyone else here have any experience of comparing such tools, and have any particular recommendations that I should check out?

All the best,

Matt
User avatar
Mixedup
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4548 Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 12:00 am Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by The Elf »

I've not yet found an automatic process that works as well as manual, but multi-band compression (especially Waves C4/C6) is about as close as I've come to it.

My custom frequency split technique (discussed somewhere back in the mists of the SOS forums!) does a pretty good job, but still relies on a bit of automation, so not really much better than a multi-band really.
User avatar
The Elf
Forum Aficionado
Posts: 20028 Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by sonics »

It sounds as if you're at the same stage as me. I've used all the tools you mention, but for some jobs manual editing is simply the most effective way.

It strikes me that this is a perfect candidate for AI processing. Is there not an online service that provides this yet?
sonics
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1634 Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 12:00 am Location: Canada
 

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by Tomás Mulcahy »

Have you tried the Izotope RX Breath Control module? It's included in the basic version. I've not tried that particular module, but RX is a must-have for audio post IMO.
User avatar
Tomás Mulcahy
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2564 Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 12:00 am Location: Cork, Ireland.

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by Mixedup »

Thanks guys. Yes, I have RX10 Pro. And Descript is a good AI based online tool but its Studio Sound feature doesn't offer separate access to debreath, denouse, dereverb etc. And it has a great transcribe and 'edit audio like a Word processor' function. (Not to mention autostripping filler words, repetition etc.). It's definitely where this world is headed. But as I day, there are always enough 'misfires' in all these things that I still have to go through, listen out for it and edit... so there may be fewer clicks and swipes, but really it takes just as long for not quite as good/controllable a result.

Wouldn't it be nice to be able to train an AI de-anythinger?!

I've tried multiband compression, dynamic EQ and a deesser too, Elf, including fiddling with the sidechain. But no beans with any threshold-based processors.
User avatar
Mixedup
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4548 Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 12:00 am Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by James Perrett »

Mixedup wrote: Sat Dec 03, 2022 7:52 pm Wouldn't it be nice to be able to train an AI de-anythinger?!

The best ones are open source and trainable so we just need a tame computer science student to create an easy training method that the average studio person can use.
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 14354 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by James Perrett »

James Perrett wrote: Sat Dec 03, 2022 8:14 pm
Mixedup wrote: Sat Dec 03, 2022 7:52 pm Wouldn't it be nice to be able to train an AI de-anythinger?!

The best ones are open source and trainable so we just need a tame computer science student to create an easy training method that the average studio person can use.

Actually it looks like the people behind Demucs are working on AI speech de-noising.

https://facebookresearch.github.io/denoiser/

They seem to be getting into all kinds of interesting work...
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 14354 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by Tim Gillett »

Except for maybe the second file in 'real rec' (0:17 secs) the sample speech files seem pretty much 100% intelligible, even before the noise has been reduced.

https://facebookresearch.github.io/denoiser/
Tim Gillett
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2632 Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:00 am Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by Mixedup »

Thanks. Yeah. As I say Descript's Studio Sound 8s AI based and does a really impressive job of it already. But success varies according to captured audio quality (over which you may not gave control/influence), whether any processing is baked in, accents etc.

But I'll look into the other suggestion. Ideally I want AI only for specific processes. Kinda like RX but with better results haha. Also, I'd like the moon on a stick please :lol:
User avatar
Mixedup
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4548 Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 12:00 am Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by Hugh Robjohns »

Mixedup wrote: Sun Dec 04, 2022 1:23 pmAlso, I'd like the moon on a stick please :lol:

Available from Amazon, apparently. Some assembly required.... :lol:
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 38982 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual... 

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by LeVzi »

Waves do a plugin called debreath.

It does work, but tuning it can be fiddly.
LeVzi
Posts: 2 Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:02 am
KVR can kiss my ****

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by MarkOne »

Hugh Robjohns wrote: Sun Dec 04, 2022 11:23 pm
Mixedup wrote: Sun Dec 04, 2022 1:23 pmAlso, I'd like the moon on a stick please :lol:

Available from Amazon, apparently. Some assembly required.... :lol:

I did buy that, I wouldn’t recommend it though. The stick isn’t quite long enough, and I got into all kinds of trouble with NASA. Something to do with a near miss with Artemis 1.
MarkOne
Frequent Poster
Posts: 2738 Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:00 am Location: Bristol, England, Earth, Perseus Gap, Milky Way
My Music on Apple Music
My Music on Spotify

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by JAB Studio »

Izotope RX Dialog Isolate is the holy grail for dialog cleanup. I've tried everything and short of manual editing, this is absolutely the best.

jab
JAB Studio
New here
Posts: 13 Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2023 6:19 pm

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by Matt Houghton »

Thanks. Yeah, I have and use RX10 a lot. It's wonderful for lots of things. But I'm finding the breath control side of things is too hit and miss. Hence I'm doing it manually (or at least only semi-automatically!) in Reaper, and hence the original post.
Matt Houghton
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1313 Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:00 am
SOS Reviews Editor

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by JAB Studio »

Not " breath control". It sucks. Use "dialog isolate". I master e-books and think dialog isolate is the bomb.

jab
JAB Studio
New here
Posts: 13 Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2023 6:19 pm

Re: ?Breath removal/reduction recommendations?

Post by Matt Houghton »

Thanks. Yeah, I understand: Breath control is the aim, Dialogue Isolate the means you suggest to achieve it, instead of the dedicated de-breath tool. I've not had any great success with either for this, compared with manual edits. Maybe I need to out more time into learning how to get the best out of it...
Matt Houghton
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1313 Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:00 am
SOS Reviews Editor
Post Reply