32 or 64 bit
Moderator: Moderators
32 or 64 bit
Pure academic question, is there any advantage apart from the 4gb RAM limit on 32 bit, quality wise, to recording (Cubase 8.5 Pro) using 64 bit version?
Capitalisation is the difference between helping your uncle jack off a horse & helping your Uncle Jack off a horse.
Re: 32 or 64 bit
No. It's all about addressing more memory. You may get better performance in 64-bit mode as you can pull twice as much data in per clock pulse, but only if the code is optimised to do so (not all is). But more RAM these days normally is a huge advantage in running a DAW, especially with large sample libraries. However the sound quality remains the same.
Reliably fallible.
Re: 32 or 64 bit
Thanks for that, you confirmed what I thought it might be. Only other problem I find is most of my lovely 32b plugs wont play ball with any kind of Bridge.
But not a major issue.
But not a major issue.
Capitalisation is the difference between helping your uncle jack off a horse & helping your Uncle Jack off a horse.
Re: 32 or 64 bit
Exactly.
In later versions (I’m not sure if it includes 8.5) Cubase added the ability to run the audio engine at 64 bit precision. That probably made no difference either in practice!
In later versions (I’m not sure if it includes 8.5) Cubase added the ability to run the audio engine at 64 bit precision. That probably made no difference either in practice!
Re: 32 or 64 bit
In theory 32 bit floating point isn't quite precise enough for audio processing. That's why most audio processing engines use 64 bit floats or older hardware will use 48-56 bit integers.
- James Perrett
Moderator -
Posts: 13012 Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am
Location: The wilds of Hampshire
Contact:
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page
Re: 32 or 64 bit
As James says, there is a small theoretical benefit to 64 bit float which is basically to do with rounding errors. I doubt anyone would notice with real-world recorded audio, though, and all computers are 64-bit now anyway.
- Hugh Robjohns
Moderator -
Posts: 35964 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual...
Re: 32 or 64 bit
That’s true - but many plugins that need that precision already convert incoming 32 bit signals to 64 bit for internal processing.
Re: 32 or 64 bit
I'm intrigued by this comment, as I've had no problems running any of my now comparatively rare 32-bit plug-ins within Reaper using its own integral bridging.
Can you give a couple of examples of specific plug-ins that won't run within Cubase 8.5 Pro?
- Martin Walker
Moderator -
Posts: 20052 Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:44 am
Location: Cornwall, UK
Contact:
Re: 32 or 64 bit
Reaper does seem to handle 32-bit plugins better than some (most?) other DAWs.
- Drew Stephenson
Jedi Poster -
Posts: 21473 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Contact:
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I still have no idea what I'm doing...
Ignore the post count, I still have no idea what I'm doing...
Re: 32 or 64 bit
Even thouigh I have Amplitube 5, I like some of the sims in Amplitube 3, that wont load, neither do any Lexicon native reverbs, eTap2, or EMI TG 12412/12414 etc.
Capitalisation is the difference between helping your uncle jack off a horse & helping your Uncle Jack off a horse.
Re: 32 or 64 bit
I gave up running 32-bit plug-ins in Cubase ages ago, but also in Reaper, as they sat in a separate Window that was handled differently from the rest, and that got really annoying! Dunno if that's changes since then, as I've not looked back...
-
- Matt Houghton
Frequent Poster - Posts: 1154 Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:00 am
SOS Reviews Editor