Ampster or small tube amp or DSP or ……..

For all things relating to guitars, basses, amps, pedals & accessories.

Moderator: Moderators

Re: Ampster or small tube amp or DSP or ……..

Post by ef37a »

The Elf wrote: Fri Mar 24, 2023 4:50 pm Interesting. I've always preferred my Radial J48 for bass and my Red Eye (or Orchid) for guitars. I've often wondered what it is that draws me to these conclusions, but I've also never doubted myself. It's just become something I don't even question. Maybe there's something in it...

I think I am right in saying that the Radial uses a audio transformer whereas the Orchid does not? That might have some bearing on your preference Elf?

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 15863 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk

Re: Ampster or small tube amp or DSP or ……..

Post by The Elf »

ef37a wrote: Fri Mar 24, 2023 5:03 pm
The Elf wrote: Fri Mar 24, 2023 4:50 pm Interesting. I've always preferred my Radial J48 for bass and my Red Eye (or Orchid) for guitars. I've often wondered what it is that draws me to these conclusions, but I've also never doubted myself. It's just become something I don't even question. Maybe there's something in it...

I think I am right in saying that the Radial uses a audio transformer whereas the Orchid does not? That might have some bearing on your preference Elf?

Dave.

Possibly, but the Red Eye does have a transformer inside.
User avatar
The Elf
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19629 Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: Ampster or small tube amp or DSP or ……..

Post by ef37a »

The Elf wrote: Fri Mar 24, 2023 5:33 pm
ef37a wrote: Fri Mar 24, 2023 5:03 pm
The Elf wrote: Fri Mar 24, 2023 4:50 pm Interesting. I've always preferred my Radial J48 for bass and my Red Eye (or Orchid) for guitars. I've often wondered what it is that draws me to these conclusions, but I've also never doubted myself. It's just become something I don't even question. Maybe there's something in it...

I think I am right in saying that the Radial uses a audio transformer whereas the Orchid does not? That might have some bearing on your preference Elf?

Dave.

Possibly, but the Red Eye does have a transformer inside.

Right, but then for any given size/price of transformer, distortion increases as frequency goes down. I 'think' 3rd harmonic doubles for every every octave drop? So a bass is going to have a bit more 'attitude' than a sixer.

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 15863 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk

Re: Ampster or small tube amp or DSP or ……..

Post by IAA »

Update :wave:

Well, hmmm, errr,

A splitter arrived before DI box and high pitched whine, earth loop by the sounds of it. So that’s gone. Hopefully DI box will do the job.

Whilst I was messing about I tried a mic in front of amp vs guitar straight into instrument input on my Apogee interface and then Amplitude.

Amplitude won hands down!

I’m sure you’re not surprised given it’s a modelling practice amp, but it was unbelievably worse than the DI. In fact I’m not sure if the DI box will be required :roll:

Clearly if I had a boutique amp (and a drawer full of mics) it might be a different story. But I don’t hear any real latency even going through the software. So for now I’m going to concentrate on DI and see if the box adds anything.

Thanks all.

Ian
IAA
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1190 Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:00 am

Re: Ampster or small tube amp or DSP or ……..

Post by ef37a »

Just slightly confused Ian, have you tried the ID via its USB connection?

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 15863 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk

Re: Ampster or small tube amp or DSP or ……..

Post by IAA »

No Dave, I know it can do that but my projects run through my apogee and I didn’t want to use the AI capability because of workflow.

I suppose as a relatively inexperienced guitarist (being a keys player) I just wanted the best and easiest way to record guitar. The DI route seems easiest and leave the practice amps for well, practice!

Cheers

Ian
IAA
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1190 Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:00 am

Re: Ampster or small tube amp or DSP or ……..

Post by The Elf »

IAA wrote: Sat Mar 25, 2023 6:16 pmI’m not sure if the DI box will be required...

There are several reasons I record a DI along with any guitar, least of which is to simply re-amp for tone. That DI acts as a guide for timing corrections, and can also be edited to remove fluffs before passing back to the amp to re-record and hide the edits.

So if you get a DI it may be more useful than you imagine!

But if you now plan to always plug straight into your AI then it is, indeed, of questionable value.
User avatar
The Elf
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19629 Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: Ampster or small tube amp or DSP or ……..

Post by IAA »

It’s tricky Elf. In part I read info/opinion that says plugging into AI is a real no no because of coloring of signal, but to my ears it sounds fine. So i will try a DI just to see - I have a radial turning up on Monday, crossing the splitter going in the opposite direction.

I’m no Gordon, but I want my efforts to sound their best!

Cheers

Ian
IAA
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1190 Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:00 am

Re: Ampster or small tube amp or DSP or ……..

Post by The Elf »

IAA wrote: Sat Mar 25, 2023 9:44 pm It’s tricky Elf. In part I read info/opinion that says plugging into AI is a real no no because of coloring of signal...

Most of that kind of info/opinion is of dubious quality. If it sounds fine to you then go with it.

It never ceases to amaze me what people can hear when they know what want to hear... ;):D
User avatar
The Elf
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19629 Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: Ampster or small tube amp or DSP or ……..

Post by IAA »

:thumbup:
IAA
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1190 Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:00 am

Re: Ampster or small tube amp or DSP or ……..

Post by Wonks »

It can depend on the input impedance of the AI. I think it’s been said before in this thread, but worth repeating, that not all ‘Instrument/Inst’ inputs have the typical 1 megohm impedance that a guitar or bass amp has.

Some are significantly less, with a resulting loss of high end, and some are higher e.g. 2 megohms, resulting in a slightly brighter character.

But then not all active DI boxes have a 1 meg input impedance either.

Assuming that your AI has a 1 megohm impedance, then the other factor that can affect the sound is the lack of acoustic feedback (when using headphones or very quiet monitors) compared to playing a loud guitar amp. Not important in a lot of music styles, but for say loud rock music, you aren’t going to get very long sustained induced feedback notes without some artificial aid (such as a Fernades sustainer or a digital ‘hold’ pedal). Which still won’t get quite the same sound as a semi-acoustic guitar on the edge of body resonance through volume.

So in that instance there will be a difference to a straight DI to an AI’s Inst input that can only be solved by volume at the time of recording. But that’s not strictly down to the Inst input, just the lack of volume to get an acoustic feedback interaction with the guitar.

Loud monitors can achieve very similar results to a loud amp (though most small studio monitors are never going to achieve cranked Marshall stack levels of volume). But for most domestic recording environments, getting a guitar amp or monitors that loud isn’t a feasible proposition anyway.

Otherwise, recording via the Inst input on an AI should capture pretty much the same input as a DI box when playing an amp at fairly quiet levels (a subjective term I know).

Any other difference will come down to the feel of how the player reacts to hearing a software amp compared to a real one, due to the AI round trip and processing latencies (which will be variable depending on the AI and buffer settings and software used). Some people are more sensitive to latency than others. Some can adjust and play slightly ahead of the note, so they hear the note start at the correct time, and some can’t, so that slight delay can put some people off playing at their best.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 15701 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Reading, UK
Reliably fallible.

Re: Ampster or small tube amp or DSP or ……..

Post by Wonks »

But also a :thumbup: to what The Elf said.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 15701 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Reading, UK
Reliably fallible.
Post Reply