Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Discuss the hardware/software tools and techniques involved in capturing sound, in the studio or on location.

Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by FullPoker »

Hello,

Apologies as probably this question is already addressed somewhere in this forum, but I have no time to check it thoroughly as I would need a quick reply if possible.

1) I am a beginner who wants to start producing music for fun, no business
2) However, high fidelity/quality of the final output is fundamental otherwise it would not be fun for me. I am insanely demanding here. Ideally, I would really like to get to the audio quality (I think “mastering” quality is the right word here) of the professionals… Sorry if this looks unrealistic, but let me “dream” about this at least for a while… LoL
3) I am not able at all to read music (probably I never will), and I can only play a little bit the piano/keyboard. This means that basically I am not able to play any instrument
4) A few months ago I bought FL Studio and Akai MK3. At first attempt, I managed to make a cover of Better Off Alone by Alice DJ. I inserted 80% of the piano roll manually with the keyboard of the PC, with the little help Akai mini mk3 to insert some Arpeggiator. I sent the mp3 to a professionist through some friends who knew him. He is not a famous one, but somebody who does music production for living. I managed to get a couple of brief replies from him as unfortunately he is not very much accessible. He wrote that it is unbelievable what I managed to do at first attempt, and still asked whether I had mixed existing tracks rather than creating everything bit by bit by myself. When I confirmed that the latter was true, he wrote something like “I still do not really believe you; anyway this is something that comes from inside you… do not let it go, keep doing and improving it…you have surely a lot of talent”.

Now the question.

Can I achieve professional audio quality with:

- FL Studio (provided that I have the right plug-ins)
- A low entry gaming laptop like MSI i7-11800 with 16 GB RAM, low-entry Nvidia GPU for dual monitors ( I have two large 34 inched extra wide monitors)
- Akai Mk3
- MOTU M2 audio interface. The reason I have bought this is not to connect instruments to it. The reason is primarily to use native ASIO and have high quality audio output for my Headphones today and tomorrow for the monitor speakers if I will buy them. I am not interested to connect any guitar etc…to the audio interface. You should know by now why: a) I am not able to play it!; b) despite how fun it can be, I will never be able to reach professional studio quality. Therefore, all the sounds have to be created by the CPU of the computer with the possible exception of the microphone for the voice. Do you understand my philosophy behind all this? Does it make sense to you?
- Beyer DT 990 PRO

That’s all I have so far.

Many thanks in advance.

FullPoker
FullPoker
Poster
Posts: 21 Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:09 am

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by jaminem »

Hi, err ok.
So on the one hand you're asking if the kit you have allows you to obtain professional results and and on the other you're saying you made a track with that kit that a 'professional' said was good?

I think you have your answer!

Basically a talented engineer/mixer can make excellent sounding results with the most basic of kit - nothing wrong with FL studio or your audio interface quality wise. The thing that makes the difference is talent, experience and a decent listening environment (including monitors/room treatment etc)

If you're happy with the results, others like it and you like that they like it and its just for fun, then you're all good right?

I know Better off alone very well and its a fantastic example of a great hook, simple arrangement well chosen sounds and attention to detail.

If you've recreated it and it sounds great then well done! I guess for development purposes you'll probably find it more difficult to find sounds, arrange and mix your own tracks to the same standard - but that's the fun of it, learning what effects what, how to construct a decent song etc.

You may also want to try recording real instruments or creating your own sounds in your own arrangements - these are different skills but equally valid
jaminem
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1456 Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2001 12:00 am

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by RichardT »

The main determinant is skill! The best way to get skilled is to produce lots of music, ask for help on forums like this one, and read good material such as Mike Senior's 'Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio'.

What counts as top quality really depends on the genre. For example, classical and acoustic jazz recordings concentrate on creating realistic sounds with little processing. Pop genres on the other hand are highly processed. So it depends on what you're trying to do.

That said there are two areas that I find really important to producing good results with sampled instruments - having good quality software instruments and having high quality monitoring.

For piano sounds there are lots of good software instruments around. I like Native Instruments' Noire, but there are other really good ones too.

In terms of monitoring, many people believe that any competent audio interface and decent pair of headphones is good enough these days to produce professional results. I believe this too, but I would add that if you can afford really good headphones and DAC / headphone amp it makes things so much easier - the greater levels of clarity and neutrality making mixing more straightforward and rewarding, plus it's possible to really hear what's going on with other people's recordings.

But as you’re just starting out, I would say that your hardware is perfectly fine. It’s only worth spending more if it turns into something you want to devote a lot of time and effort to.
RichardT
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4318 Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 12:00 am Location: Ireland

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by ef37a »

You would have to spend an awful lot more money to get a better interface than the MOTU M2 and I doubt even THE most expensive model would give you
any noticeable improvement. The more so because you are not dealing with real, acoustic sounds.

The headphones are considered very good I think? There are much more expensive ones but headphone 'quality' seems even more subjective than that of speakers! My personal view is that I would get some monitor speakers sooner rather than later but that is a considerable outlay, $2000 per pair is probably the starting point for something accurate and then you will need to treat your room.

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 16755 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by FullPoker »

jaminem wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:51 am Hi, err ok.
So on the one hand you're asking if the kit you have allows you to obtain professional results and and on the other you're saying you made a track with that kit that a 'professional' said was good?

I think you have your answer!

Basically a talented engineer/mixer can make excellent sounding results with the most basic of kit - nothing wrong with FL studio or your audio interface quality wise. The thing that makes the difference is talent, experience and a decent listening environment (including monitors/room treatment etc)

If you're happy with the results, others like it and you like that they like it and its just for fun, then you're all good right?

I know Better off alone very well and its a fantastic example of a great hook, simple arrangement well chosen sounds and attention to detail.

If you've recreated it and it sounds great then well done! I guess for development purposes you'll probably find it more difficult to find sounds, arrange and mix your own tracks to the same standard - but that's the fun of it, learning what effects what, how to construct a decent song etc.

You may also want to try recording real instruments or creating your own sounds in your own arrangements - these are different skills but equally valid

Thank you very much for your prompt feedback. Very much appreciated.

What I managed to achieve with Better Off Alone was a 6 (out of my personal scale between 0 and 10), but I want to get to 10 otherwise I will not enjoy it enough to sustain the effort required to get there :crazy:

And yes, that Better Off Alone song is crazy. At first glance it looks so simple, but the more you try to make a cover and the more you realize how many details are there. And some are really sneaky/hidden, at least to my beginners ears... Usually, details make a small difference but in that song it is completely different...I think it is a little piece of art, especially considered that was done almost 25 years ago...

By the way, I bought the Motu2, the DT990 and the low entry gaming laptop only a few days ago. I did the cover with crappy headphones and the crappy default sound card of a my PC (Ryzen 5 - 6 cores 1600; 8 GB RAM).I think that the PC was still fine as the FL Studio CPU never went above 20%... I bought the laptop to get portable...with a significant upgrade of CPU and RAM not be forced to change it soon...

Cheers,
FullPoker
FullPoker
Poster
Posts: 21 Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:09 am

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by FullPoker »

RichardT wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 12:19 pm The main determinant is skill! The best way to get skilled is to produce lots of music, ask for help on forums like this one, and read good material such as Mike Senior's 'Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio'.

What counts as top quality really depends on the genre. For example, classical and acoustic jazz recordings concentrate on creating realistic sounds with little processing. Pop genres on the other hand are highly processed. So it depends on what you're trying to do.

That said there are two areas that I find really important to producing good results with sampled instruments - having good quality software instruments and having high quality monitoring.

For piano sounds there are lots of good software instruments around. I like Native Instruments' Noire, but there are other really good ones too.

In terms of monitoring, many people believe that any competent audio interface and decent pair of headphones is good enough these days to produce professional results. I believe this too, but I would add that if you can afford really good headphones and DAC / headphone amp it makes things so much easier - the greater levels of clarity and neutrality making mixing more straightforward and rewarding, plus it's possible to really hear what's going on with other people's recordings.

But as you’re just starting out, I would say that your hardware is perfectly fine. It’s only worth spending more if it turns into something you want to devote a lot of time and effort to.

Thansk very much for your reply, very much appreacited.
FullPoker
Poster
Posts: 21 Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:09 am

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by Sam Spoons »

Unlike #ef37a (sorry Dave) I think decent monitors plus room treatment (essential once you buy monitors) could come in under £2000 in the UK, say Neumann KH80 and some absorbers/traps from someone like Gik Acoustics. Without a good acoustic environment you are better off sticking with headphones and playing back you finished mix on as many different systems as you can to make sure it translates.
User avatar
Sam Spoons
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19932 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
People often mistake me for a grown-up because of my age.

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by ef37a »

Sam Spoons wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 2:36 pm Unlike #ef37a (sorry Dave) I think decent monitors plus room treatment (essential once you buy monitors) could come in under £2000 in the UK, say Neumann KH80 and some absorbers/traps from someone like Gik Acoustics. Without a good acoustic environment you are better off sticking with headphones and playing back you finished mix on as many different systems as you can to make sure it translates.

Sam, I did price the monitors in $ as I usually do unless it is obvious the poster is in UK. As it happens I have just read a review of Phil's of some APS 2020s that come in at under £1000 the pair and get a near perfect score!
I said "monitors sooner rather than later" because I am personally a bit averse to the restrictions of headphones and unless the chap mixes in the bathroom he will probably need minimal room treatment.

Also I am sure far 'puter smarter people than I will agree that he does not need to worry about either of his computers? Just perhaps check the 'gamer' hasn't got a lot of CPU sucking crap on it?

Re piano sounds, do not forget the excellent Pianoteq.

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 16755 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by Sam Spoons »

Yes you did :thumbup: I've just had a quick look at the US price for KH80s and Sweetwater have them at $549 each (presumably plus local sales tax). But that's still a bit less than you suggested. That said the KH80's are probably the minimum and may not be suitable for all genres so he could well end up spending $2k.
User avatar
Sam Spoons
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19932 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
People often mistake me for a grown-up because of my age.

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by Bob Bickerton »

ef37a wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 4:30 pm
………I said "monitors sooner rather than later" because I am personally a bit averse to the restrictions of headphones and unless the chap mixes in the bathroom he will probably need minimal room treatment………

Dave.

Sorry Dave, but room treatment is really important and shouldn’t be downplayed - it’s critical if you really want to hear what’s going on.

Bob
User avatar
Bob Bickerton
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5130 Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 12:00 am Location: Nelson, New Zealand

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by Wonks »

But FullPoker has a way to go yet as he's just started out with music software. They're not going to go from someone's 6 to a 10 in a few weeks. Even if naturally talented in composition there's a lot of technique and understanding to pick up, which doesn't come quickly.

When you are new, it's very easy to think you've come up with a great sounding, well produced track, but compared to a full pro track, there will almost certainly be a lot missing, especially variations in sound, rhythm and 'fairy dust'.

You may get from 6 to an 8 fairly quickly with guidance and feedback, but the learning and progress becomes slower from then on.

So I'd suggest carrying on with what you've currently got until you maybe think you're at say an 8, and then review where you are and if you want to carry on. If you do, then think about room acoustic treatment and some good monitors. Because good monitors are only good in an acoustically treated room.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 17233 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Reading, UK
Reliably fallible.

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by ef37a »

Bob Bickerton wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 7:22 pm
ef37a wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 4:30 pm
………I said "monitors sooner rather than later" because I am personally a bit averse to the restrictions of headphones and unless the chap mixes in the bathroom he will probably need minimal room treatment………

Dave.

Sorry Dave, but room treatment is really important and shouldn’t be downplayed - it’s critical if you really want to hear what’s going on.

Bob

Yes, this is something that causes endless discussions on forums. The first argument is that nearfield monitoring reduces the effects of a room considerably. Then a great deal of treatment advice is centred on getting a good, stable stereo image (I have read SO many Studio SOS articles!). The OP is not monitoring live ensembles so 'stereo' is anything he wants it to be.
Then, much depends I think on the actual room. My Tannoys for example are in my living room and that has a heavy carpet/underlay over wood, Heavy curtains and a socking great sofa in it. Works for me.

Please understand, I am not saying rooms do not benefit from treatment but unless one is doing critical commercial work I doubt the 'hobbyist' needs to go nuts? This is the general advice in the S SOS articles as well.

Dave.

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 16755 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by Wonks »

You must have been reading different SOS articles to me then!
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 17233 Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am Location: Reading, UK
Reliably fallible.

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by Bob Bickerton »

ef37a wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 7:44 pm ........My Tannoys for example are in my living room and that has a heavy carpet/underlay over wood, Heavy curtains and a socking great sofa in it. Works for me........

There you go it does make a difference! and worth noting for newcomers........

Bob
User avatar
Bob Bickerton
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5130 Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 12:00 am Location: Nelson, New Zealand

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by RichardT »

Wonks wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 7:24 pm But FullPoker has a way to go yet as he's just started out with music software. They're not going to go from someone's 6 to a 10 in a few weeks. Even if naturally talented in composition there's a lot of technique and understanding to pick up, which doesn't come quickly.

When you are new, it's very easy to think you've come up with a great sounding, well produced track, but compared to a full pro track, there will almost certainly be a lot missing, especially variations in sound, rhythm and 'fairy dust'.

You may get from 6 to an 8 fairly quickly with guidance and feedback, but the learning and progress becomes slower from then on.

So I'd suggest carrying on with what you've currently got until you maybe think you're at say an 8, and then review where you are and if you want to carry on. If you do, then think about room acoustic treatment and some good monitors. Because good monitors are only good in an acoustically treated room.

I agree completely!
RichardT
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4318 Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 12:00 am Location: Ireland

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by ef37a »

Bob Bickerton wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:23 pm
ef37a wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 7:44 pm ........My Tannoys for example are in my living room and that has a heavy carpet/underlay over wood, Heavy curtains and a socking great sofa in it. Works for me........

There you go it does make a difference! and worth noting for newcomers........

Bob

I was pointing out (as I am sure you knew only too well) that many rooms are already pretty well 'treated' with carpet, furniture etc. Sure, if the guy lived in a place with bare plaster walls and a hard floor with stainless minimalist chairs he would need to do something about it.

The extra steps needed (as exemplified in the SOS articles*) amount usually to killing reflections and maybe a bit of trapping but not to any expensive extent.

Yes of course, for commercial work a much greater degree of room treatment would be needed and one would call in a professional and spend thousands. But, as the Irishman said, "You wouldn't start from here".

*There have been none of course for a couple of years but I dug out 3 and they did not go overboard with treatment. Maybe find a few and understand my points?

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 16755 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by Bob Bickerton »

Dave, we're on the same page, I just felt for the benefit of people reading this thread that it was worth clarifying that it's considered practice around here to consider acoustic treatment (in whatever form) when setting up a room - bathroom or not.

Didn't mean to offend ;)

Bob
User avatar
Bob Bickerton
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5130 Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 12:00 am Location: Nelson, New Zealand

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by ef37a »

Bob Bickerton wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:34 pm Dave, we're on the same page, I just felt for the benefit of people reading this thread that it was worth clarifying that it's considered practice around here to consider acoustic treatment (in whatever form) when setting up a room - bathroom or not.

Didn't mean to offend ;)

Bob

Not offended in the slightest Bob. I am just a bit worried when certain people on forums, at the mention of monitors insist folk go and strip the shelves of GF at B&Q!

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 16755 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by Sam Spoons »

Likewise Dave, we have shared this forum long enough to not wish to cause offence but I have personal experience of recording in my living room (with two sofas, heavy curtains and a thick carpet), and my 'studio' with both rudimentary treatment and more considered and extensive acoustic treatment and, if I'm evangelical about the matter it's because the difference between the three is dramatic. The living room was exactly what you would expect, it's a fairly big room by domestic standards, 17' x 15' x 10' 6", but sounded boxy and 'amateur', the much smaller 'studio' was a little better with a few 'egg box' foam panels on the ceiling over the drum kit and a strategically placed duvet. Fitting the 'proper' acoustic panels when I refurbished the room a few years ago was a revelation and gave me a much nicer sounding space to rehearse, record and mix in. I realise the OP is not recording with microphones but the basic principle still remains that an untreated room is not going to help the pursuit of excellence when aspiring to mix music to a professional (as he desires) standard. I'm not suggesting spending hundreds of pounds/dollars but, for just mixing not recording/rehearsing, I could have used half the panels I installed and I spent a little over £300 on 13 panels to treat my room but four broad band panels (costing about £25 each to DIY) at the mirror points would make a huge difference to an otherwise untreated room.
User avatar
Sam Spoons
Jedi Poster
Posts: 19932 Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:00 am Location: Manchester UK
People often mistake me for a grown-up because of my age.

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by Bob Bickerton »

ef37a wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:39 pm
Bob Bickerton wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:34 pm Dave, we're on the same page, I just felt for the benefit of people reading this thread that it was worth clarifying that it's considered practice around here to consider acoustic treatment (in whatever form) when setting up a room - bathroom or not.

Didn't mean to offend ;)

Bob

Not offended in the slightest Bob. I am just a bit worried when certain people on forums, at the mention of monitors insist folk go and strip the shelves of GF at B&Q!

Dave.

I'm sorry we're down this rabbit-hole. No one is suggesting stripping shelves anywhere - I, and others, are simply saying acoustic treatment should be a consideration. It's been discussed hundreds of times in these forums and in SOS articles. Simple as that!

Bob
User avatar
Bob Bickerton
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5130 Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 12:00 am Location: Nelson, New Zealand

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by Drew Stephenson »

Probably worth heading this side-track off at the pass. ;)

Back to the OP, what you have now is all you need for now. Wonks' point about revisiting it once you've raised your own standards is when the rest of this discussion really kicks in. :thumbup:
User avatar
Drew Stephenson
Apprentice Guru
Posts: 25027 Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am Location: York
(The forumuser formerly known as Blinddrew)
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
https://drewstephenson.bandcamp.com/

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by Philbo King »

This has always been true:
It isn't what you have, it's what you do with it.

Gear is a tool to get a task done. The mechanic does not invest in platinum-plated socket sets, he uses the tool that will do the job with minimum cost and time.

The song, arrangement, performance, and passion (defined here as the ability to evoke emotion in the listener) are far more important than whether you used a pair of U47 mics for drum overhead mics or recorded it with this DAW or that DAW.

There are things you can do to make mixing easier. Measure playback response at listening position with a measurement mic and determine the frequency response of your room/speaker setup. Add acoustics room treatment and/or uograde your monitors if needed (treatment is almost always needed). Add digital minimum phase EQ if needed to cut freq response peaks due to room nodes.
That gives you technical accuracy.

But it will not create an engaging musical performance. Some of the best music in the last century was made in technically imperfect rooms. Patsy Cline's biggest hit song was recorded in a quanset hut (a steel storage shed) on a 2 or 3 track tape machine. The magic was in the song and the singing, and the technical imoerfections were overshadowed by her performance.
Philbo King
Regular
Posts: 242 Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:07 pm

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by Arpangel »

FullPoker wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 2:18 pm What I managed to achieve with Better Off Alone was a 6 (out of my personal scale between 0 and 10), but I want to get to 10 otherwise I will not enjoy it enough to sustain the effort required to get there :crazy:

By the way, I bought the Motu2, the DT990 and the low entry gaming laptop only a few days ago. I did the cover with crappy headphones and the crappy default sound card of a my PC (Ryzen 5 - 6 cores 1600; 8 GB RAM).I think that the PC was still fine as the FL Studio CPU never went above 20%... I bought the laptop to get portable...with a significant upgrade of CPU and RAM not be forced to change it soon...

Cheers,
FullPoker

I think your original post wasn’t necessary, you seem to be doing fine.
Also, I find it a bit strange, that you’re rating the things you do on a "scale" of 1-10 this is all a bit clinical, and also, unnecessary.
Just concentrate on your music, and don’t over-think the gear.
User avatar
Arpangel
Jedi Poster
Posts: 16803 Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 12:00 am

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by jaminem »

FullPoker wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 2:18 pm

And yes, that Better Off Alone song is crazy. ...I think it is a little piece of art, especially considered that was done almost 25 years ago...

I bought it new as a CD single when it came out after hearing it in clubs... :lolno:
jaminem
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1456 Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2001 12:00 am

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by ef37a »

Arpangel wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:27 am
FullPoker wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 2:18 pm What I managed to achieve with Better Off Alone was a 6 (out of my personal scale between 0 and 10), but I want to get to 10 otherwise I will not enjoy it enough to sustain the effort required to get there :crazy:

By the way, I bought the Motu2, the DT990 and the low entry gaming laptop only a few days ago. I did the cover with crappy headphones and the crappy default sound card of a my PC (Ryzen 5 - 6 cores 1600; 8 GB RAM).I think that the PC was still fine as the FL Studio CPU never went above 20%... I bought the laptop to get portable...with a significant upgrade of CPU and RAM not be forced to change it soon...

Cheers,
FullPoker

I think your original post wasn’t necessary, you seem to be doing fine.
Also, I find it a bit strange, that you’re rating the things you do on a "scale" of 1-10 this is all a bit clinical, and also, unnecessary.
Just concentrate on your music, and don’t over-think the gear.

Well, "Blows me down Olive" I find myself in almost complete agreement with you for once Mr Tony. (could have added "and room" Boom! Boom!)

Dave.
ef37a
Jedi Poster
Posts: 16755 Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am Location: northampton uk

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by Exalted Wombat »

Uncalled-for comment removed --ED.
Exalted Wombat
Longtime Poster
Posts: 5816 Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:00 am Location: London UK
You don't have to write songs. The world doesn't want you to write songs. It would probably prefer it if you didn't. So write songs if you want to. Otherwise, dont bore us with beefing about it. Go fishing instead.

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by Eddy Deegan »

Come on EW, if you want to hear something then ask politely please.
User avatar
Eddy Deegan
Moderator
Posts: 8966 Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:00 am Location: Brighton & Hove, UK
Some of my works | The SOS Forum Album projects  

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by FullPoker »

RichardT wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:26 pm
Wonks wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 7:24 pm But FullPoker has a way to go yet as he's just started out with music software. They're not going to go from someone's 6 to a 10 in a few weeks. Even if naturally talented in composition there's a lot of technique and understanding to pick up, which doesn't come quickly.

When you are new, it's very easy to think you've come up with a great sounding, well produced track, but compared to a full pro track, there will almost certainly be a lot missing, especially variations in sound, rhythm and 'fairy dust'.

You may get from 6 to an 8 fairly quickly with guidance and feedback, but the learning and progress becomes slower from then on.

So I'd suggest carrying on with what you've currently got until you maybe think you're at say an 8, and then review where you are and if you want to carry on. If you do, then think about room acoustic treatment and some good monitors. Because good monitors are only good in an acoustically treated room.

I agree completely!


Hi all,

I agree too! :lol: Apart from the topic of the monitors, for which I have zero experience so I cannot really comment.

By the way, I have just re-heard for the first time my "valued 6" track with the Motu and the DT990 and...Wow, it is another track! :lol: I hear a lot of things I did not hear with the crappy headphones. Mostly defects rather than nice things...Now I give it a "5" at best!

Anyway, thanks again to all for the replies..

Cheers,
FullPoker
FullPoker
Poster
Posts: 21 Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:09 am

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by FullPoker »

Arpangel wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:27 am
FullPoker wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 2:18 pm What I managed to achieve with Better Off Alone was a 6 (out of my personal scale between 0 and 10), but I want to get to 10 otherwise I will not enjoy it enough to sustain the effort required to get there :crazy:

By the way, I bought the Motu2, the DT990 and the low entry gaming laptop only a few days ago. I did the cover with crappy headphones and the crappy default sound card of a my PC (Ryzen 5 - 6 cores 1600; 8 GB RAM).I think that the PC was still fine as the FL Studio CPU never went above 20%... I bought the laptop to get portable...with a significant upgrade of CPU and RAM not be forced to change it soon...

Cheers,
FullPoker

I think your original post wasn’t necessary, you seem to be doing fine.
Also, I find it a bit strange, that you’re rating the things you do on a "scale" of 1-10 this is all a bit clinical, and also, unnecessary.
Just concentrate on your music, and don’t over-think the gear.


I hope you are right that I am doing fine. I find music production a huge challenge...the risk of giving up at the beginning is so real...I need motivation to keep going...to break the barrier...

By the way, now that I listened to it with the DT990 and MUTU2 (instead of crappy headphones and crappy PC audio card) I would give it a 5 at best...

Cheers,
FullPOker
FullPoker
Poster
Posts: 21 Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:09 am

Re: Minimum HW and SW for top/professional audio quality output

Post by RichardT »

Eddy Deegan wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 5:45 pm Come on EW, if you want to hear something then ask politely please.

Couldn’t agree more Eddy - it was a very aggressive and unnecessary post.
RichardT
Frequent Poster
Posts: 4318 Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 12:00 am Location: Ireland
Post Reply