String quartet - 3 condensers, some 57s\58s
Moderator: Moderators
String quartet - 3 condensers, some 57s\58s
Hi all.
What would be ideal with the above setup? I was thinking:
1.ortf with two se08s, dynamics as close mikes, nt1 for center at a distance
or:
2. two se08s for vlns, sm57s for cello and vla, two sm58s for room stereo, nt1 for center.
players will be arranged as:
vln2 cello
Vln1 vla
any idea would be welcome!
What would be ideal with the above setup? I was thinking:
1.ortf with two se08s, dynamics as close mikes, nt1 for center at a distance
or:
2. two se08s for vlns, sm57s for cello and vla, two sm58s for room stereo, nt1 for center.
players will be arranged as:
vln2 cello
Vln1 vla
any idea would be welcome!
-
- Carmelious
- Posts: 3 Joined: Fri May 19, 2023 11:09 pm
Re: String quartet - 3 condensers, some 57s\58s
Are you multitracking? If so, mixing later could work well with close mics because you could compensate for phasing etc. If recording to stereo in a good sounding room, I'd keep it simple and do without the close mics.
- resistorman
Frequent Poster (Level2) - Posts: 2602 Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 12:00 am Location: Asheville NC
"The Best" piece of gear is subjective.
Re: String quartet - 3 condensers, some 57s\58s
M/S config would be my suggestion, so long as the sound in the room is pleasant.
-
- Random Guitarist
Frequent Poster - Posts: 986 Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:00 am Location: West Sussex UK
I've never liked a solo violin, you need at least five for a proper fire.
Re: String quartet - 3 condensers, some 57s\58s
Somewhat dependent on genre, room and proficiency of the players, (that is their ability to balance themselves), but I would keep it simple and go for ORTF pair.
Note: can't see options to M/S with the mics on offer.
Bob
Note: can't see options to M/S with the mics on offer.
Bob
- Bob Bickerton
Jedi Poster -
Posts: 4974 Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Contact:
Re: String quartet - 3 condensers, some 57s\58s
Bob Bickerton wrote: ↑Sat May 20, 2023 4:21 am Somewhat dependent on genre, room and proficiency of the players, (that is their ability to balance themselves), but I would keep it simple and go for ORTF pair.

-
- Mike Stranks
Jedi Poster - Posts: 10464 Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:00 am
Re: String quartet - 3 condensers, some 57s\58s
Edit:
I have 8 channels multitrack interface, the room is large and nice.
I have 8 channels multitrack interface, the room is large and nice.
-
- Carmelious
- Posts: 3 Joined: Fri May 19, 2023 11:09 pm
Re: String quartet - 3 condensers, some 57s\58s
Bob Bickerton wrote: ↑Sat May 20, 2023 4:21 am Somewhat dependent on genre, room and proficiency of the players, (that is their ability to balance themselves), but I would keep it simple and go for ORTF pair.
Note: can't see options to M/S with the mics on offer.
Bob
I think you can, point the se8s sideways opposing so the pair of cardioids is equivalent to a figure 8, NT faces front. Gain match the se8s.
But I may be wrong
-
- Random Guitarist
Frequent Poster - Posts: 986 Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:00 am Location: West Sussex UK
I've never liked a solo violin, you need at least five for a proper fire.
Re: String quartet - 3 condensers, some 57s\58s
Random Guitarist wrote: ↑Sat May 20, 2023 9:45 amBob Bickerton wrote: ↑Sat May 20, 2023 4:21 am Somewhat dependent on genre, room and proficiency of the players, (that is their ability to balance themselves), but I would keep it simple and go for ORTF pair.
Note: can't see options to M/S with the mics on offer.
Bob
I think you can, point the se8s sideways opposing so the pair of cardioids is equivalent to a figure 8, NT faces front. Gain match the se8s.
But I may be wrong
You need a tight null in the figure 8 for M/S to work properly. A cardioid still has significant pickup at 90° off-access (the sE8 is only about 7dB down at 90° at 1kHz). You’ll certainly get an image, but it won’t be a good M/S one as there will be too much of the mids in the image.
Reliably fallible.
Re: String quartet - 3 condensers, some 57s\58s
Me too! No need for close mics, no need for space mics. ORTF and spend some time moving the array closer or farther to get the ideal perspective balance. The Stereo acceptance angle with an ORTF pair is about 90 degrees so, if you want the quartet to not-quote fill the stereo image, that angle will inform you of the starting position for the mic stand. Move it closer or farther to control the balance of direct/reverb, and then you can tweak the angles of the mics slightly if necessary to adjust the stereo width if necessary.
- Hugh Robjohns
Moderator -
Posts: 38072 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual...
Re: String quartet - 3 condensers, some 57s\58s
Random Guitarist wrote: ↑Sat May 20, 2023 9:45 amI think you can, point the se8s sideways opposing so the pair of cardioids is equivalent to a figure 8, NT faces front. Gain match the se8s.
Don't forget to flip the polarity of the SE8 facing right...
But yes, you're right, you could create an MS array in that way... but it's quite difficult to mount the mics and involves a lot of iron-mongery (remember all three capsules have to be aligned in the vertical plane).
It's a lot of faff for little real benefit compared to a simple ORTF (NOS, DIN etc), or XY cardioids or Gerzon array...
- Hugh Robjohns
Moderator -
Posts: 38072 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual...
Re: String quartet - 3 condensers, some 57s\58s
It does... but you've forgotten that get's cancelled out by the same Mid pickup of the other co-incidentally mounted cardioid facing the other way and combined with opposite polarity.
Remember a Cardioid mic polar pattern is achieved through the combination of both velocity (Fig-8) and pressure (omni) elements. By combining the outputs of two coincidentally mounted cardioid capsules in opposite polarities the omni elements cancel completely, and the fig-8 elements (which are facing in opposite directions) add to produce a bigger fig-8 facing left.
As a result, there will be a deep null and there won't be any mid pickup... but that does depend on mounting the capsules so they are accurately aligned.
- Hugh Robjohns
Moderator -
Posts: 38072 Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Contact:
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual...
(But generally posting my own personal views and not necessarily those of SOS, the company or the magazine!)
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual...